Home                                 Multimedia                                  Books                             ArticlesNew!                            BlogNew!

Sunday, February 01, 2009

Birth of a New Cyclical Bull? - Puru Saxena

by Puru Saxena



BIG PICTURE - "Bull-markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria" - John Templeton, Founder of Templeton Funds

The coming year may go down in history as a bullish one. After the shocking asset-liquidation witnessed in 2008, the following 12 months are likely to provide above-average investment returns. Given the negative economic news and awful investor sentiment, my assessment may sound absurd but it looks as though the bear-market ended late last year and we are now in the early stages of a new cyclical bull-market. Below are some of the reasons why I believe the skies are clearing for a 4-5 year bull-market:

-Surging liquidity - central banks have pumped trillions into the banking system
-Low-interest rates - yield on cash and cash equivalents is at a historical low
-Declining corporate bond yields- risk appetite is returning
-Declining Ted Spread - inter-banking lending rate has declined, a positive sign
-Low valuations - various stock markets are trading at very attractive multiples
-Horrendous investor sentiment - a contrary bullish indicator
-Volatility has peaked - VIX has topped out and is falling
-US Dollar rally has ended - bullish for the markets
-Global stock markets are making higher lows - sign of base building
-Huge amount of cash on the sidelines - US$8.85 trillion or 74% of US market cap

Now, I am well aware that the above prognosis goes against the mainstream bearish view. After all, most professional and amateur investors are very worried about the state of the global economy and many are expecting a horrendous economic depression. Furthermore, according to some prominent bears, our world is heading into a deflationary bust and the Dow Jones Industrial Average is about to contract by another 50-60%.

For sure, anything is possible in the business world, but at this stage, a 1929 style economic depression is out of the question. Back then, the US economy contracted by a whopping 46%, unemployment went through the roof and thousands of Americans lost their entire savings as roughly 10,000 banks went bust. This time around, the US economy has barely shrunk, the unemployment rate is not even close to the 1982 recession and not a single person has lost money due to a bank-run. So, at least the current circumstances do not warrant a prolonged economic depression.

Let there be no doubt that the US economy is certainly struggling - housing starts, permits and home sales are at multi-decade lows, auto-sales have slumped, retail sales have contracted, unemployment is rising and manufacturing is at the lowest level since 1980. Despite all these negatives, the state of the world's largest economy is still nowhere near as bad as it was during the Great Depression.

It is interesting to note that Professor Nouriel Roubini (who correctly forecasted the extent of this economic slowdown) was recently interviewed by the Financial Times. During the interview he stated, "We are going to avoid the Great Depression and a severe recession even if there is a risk of protracted slow economic growth".

If Professor Roubini is correct about the economy, then I suspect global equity and commodity markets will see explosive moves from the current levels. We must remember that the investment community is manic-depressive and most participants have already factored in a gut-wrenching economic recession or worse. So, if the current recession does not morph into the widely expected prolonged depression, investors will have to re-think their investment strategy and this will be the catalyst for a powerful rally. Given the dismal yield available in cash and government bonds, when investors search for higher yields, capital will flow towards the beaten down equity and commodity markets. At the same time, US Treasuries will witness a spectacular crash. Figure 1 shows the astonishing decline in the yield available on 3-month US Treasury Bills.

Figure 1: Yield on US Treasury Bills (1941- present)


Source: www.thechartstore.com

As the financial crisis worsened over the past year, a growing number of investors parked their money in the 'safe haven' of US government bonds. This massive inflow of capital pushed up the value of US Treasuries and drove down the yield to almost zero.

In my view, US government bonds are now grossly inflated. I have no doubt in my mind that when global stock markets show further signs of a recovery, investors who are holding these overvalued US Treasuries will look for a higher return on their capital. And everybody will look to exit through the same crowded door. This selling mayhem may cause an epic crash in US Treasury Bills and send the yield sharply higher (Figure 1).

Over in the precious metals department, so far gold has fulfilled its 'safe haven' role by holding up relatively well in this post-bust environment. However, if my assessment about a recovery in equity and commodity markets is correct, it is possible that gold may under-perform other assets over the following months. Now, I am not saying that you sell your gold bullion but at this juncture, I prefer the hardest-hit industrial metals, silver and platinum over gold. Those metals which suffered the most over the past six months are likely to rebound the most in the ongoing recovery.

In summary, I maintain my view that global equity and commodity markets put in important lows in the final quarter of 2008 and we should see big upward moves in the months ahead. So, I would suggest that you hold on to your positions in commodities, commodity-producing companies and precious metals as we pass through the bottom of this business cycle.

Puru Saxena
http://www.purusaxena.com/

Puru Saxena is the founder of Puru Saxena Limited. Vastly experienced and respected in his field, he is a registered investment adviser with the SFC. He conducts in-depth economic research and formulates our firm's investment strategy.

Puru Saxena has a decade’s experience in the finance industry, specifically relating to investment advice and asset management.

He is a regular guest on various media such as CNN, BBC, Bloomberg TV, CNBC, RTHK, NDTV and TVB Pearl.

Labels:

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Another Confirmation of Oil Depletion - Ron Cooke

by Ron Cooke

Of all the very large companies in the oil business, one has to particularly admire the business strategy of Schlumberger. This company is the world’s leading supplier of technology, integrated project management and information solutions to customers working in the oil and gas industry. Employing more than 87,000 people in approximately 80 countries, Schlumberger attempts to work with the national governments that actually own the world’s oil resources on a cooperative basis. This non-competitive, cooperative, strategy brought Schlumberger revenues of $27.16 billion in 2008.

Because of its stature, I listen when this company comments on industry trends. In the following excerpt from a January 23, 2009 press release, Schlumberger Chairman and CEO Andrew Gould talks about the availability and price of oil. I highlighted the key points in italics:

“….. The sharp drop in oil and gas prices due to lower demand, higher inventories and the belief that demand will erode further in 2009 as a result of reduced economic activity, is leading to rapid and substantial reductions in exploration and production expenditure. At current prices most of the new categories of hydrocarbon resources are not economic to develop. It will take time for inflation to be removed from the system and to bring finding and development costs more in line with lower oil and gas prices.

We expect 2009 activity to weaken across the board with the most significant declines occurring in North American gas drilling, Russian oil production enhancement and in mature offshore basins. Exploration offshore will be somewhat curtailed but commitments already planned are likely to be honored. Seismic expenditures particularly for multiclient data are likely to decrease from last year. …

The key indicator of a future recovery in oilfield services activity will be a stabilization and recovery in the demand for oil. The recent years of increased exploration and production spending have not been sufficient to substantially improve the supply situation. The age of the production base, accelerating decline rates and the smaller size of recently developed fields will mean that any prolonged reduction in investment will sow the seeds of a strong rebound (in exploration activity). ….”

For those of us who have been concerned about oil depletion, this statement provides yet another confirmation of our analysis and conclusions. If, and when, the world economy recovers, oil supplies will again be tight, leading to another round of upward price volatility.

Ronald R. Cooke has over 33 years of professional marketing and business development experience. He has an extensive background in market research, industry analysis, and strategic planning. Prior experience includes technology assessment, operations analysis, and the evaluation of corporate financial performance. An economist by training, Ron has pursued the study of Cultural Economics since 1969. Online, Ron is The Cultural Economist and he has a newsblog as well at futurereality.org.

Labels:

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

The Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance Aligns Against Jerusalem - David J. Jonsson

David J. Jonsson
October 16, 2007

The West has a worldview based on the analysis and actions influenced by looking through the lenses of politics and economics, whereas the Islamists looks at the world through the lens of ideology. It is time for the West to place importance on looking at events happening around the world through the lens of ideologies. In the case of the Muslims, their worldview and subsequent actions are shaped by their vision for world domination, the establishment of Islamic kingdom of God on Earth – the creation of worldwide Caliphate and the End Times.

An inability to understand the ideology behind political Islam could spell disaster for the West.

The Two Phase Plan

It may be instructive to view the common motivator as a conflict of ideologies. The Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance war may be composed of two phases.

The first phase was to gain as much as possible through the inexpensive use of negotiation, politics, and economics including the oil weapon while simultaneously weakening the West through leftist, anti-Semitic, anti-American propaganda and strengthening the Islamist coalition. The Chinese Communist Party dominance of both the political and business landscape has made it more powerful than ever. On the eve of its five-yearly congress, which opens in Beijing on October 15, Chinese leaders sit atop not only the biggest political party in the world but the richest as well. Similarly, the Russian Communists under Putin continue to gain strategic and economic wealth. The juggernaut when combined with Islamists is a force to contend with. It is time for our leaders to view the current events through the prism of the Judeo-Christian ideology as presented in Bible Prophesy.

Phase two, after no more can be gained, is to go to war.

Mohammed's prophecies mostly involve the events to come at the end of the world and the Day of Judgment (Qiyamah), and are recorded in the Hadiths. The fighting against Jews is one of the many "signs" of the final days. Islamist ideologues are fully aware of the end-time prophecies, and are working to implement them. Belief in the end-times or the last days is mandatory in Islam. It is listed as the fifth article of faith.

The Last Day: the Day of Judgment, when all will be judged according to their deeds, and admitted to Paradise or to hell.

Also, playing a prominent role in end times events for all three faiths, is the appearance of Gog and Magog. These nations are mentioned in the Old Testament (Ezekiel 38 & 39), in the book of Revelation (Chapter 20) and in the Quran (Surah 18:94,97, 21:96). Gog and Magog head a group of nations opposed to God in the end of days.

Another character playing a prominent role in Islam, especially in the Shia sect is the Mahdi. Mahdi comes either before or with the return of Jesus, to set things in order. There is dispute within Islam regarding his nature and function. The Shia sect views this individual as the 12th Imam, hidden until the time when he should appear.

Shiite and Sunni Apocalyptic Teaching

As I wrote in my article Iraq, Iran, Global Warming and The Apocalypse “It is important to recognize that both the Shiites and Sunni sects have teaching related to the End Times. While the teaching of Shiite Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad considers that the return of the Mahdi, the 12th Imam as ushering in the End Times, the Sunni scholar, Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi, in a fatwa posted on the website http://www.islamonline.net/, (December 2, 2002) in response to a reader’s question, wrote of the “signs of the victory of Islam,” citing a well-known Hadith: “…

The Prophet Muhammad was asked: ‘What city will be conquered first, Constantinople or Romiyya?’ He answered: ‘The city of Hirqil [i.e. the Byzantine emperor Heraclius] will be conquered first’ - that is, Constantinople… Romiyya is the city called today ‘Rome,’ the capital of Italy. The city of Hirqil [that is, Constantinople] was conquered by the young 23-year-old Ottoman Muhammad bin Morad, known in history as Muhammad the Conqueror, in 1453. The other city, Romiyya, remains, and we hope and believe [that it too will be conquered].” (See: Al-Qaradhawi: “Islam will Return to Europe as a Conqueror” MEMRI Special Dispatch No. 447, December 6, 2002.)

“This means that Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and victor, after being expelled from it twice - once from the South, from Andalusia, and a second time from the East, when it knocked several times on the door of Athens.”

Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi qualified his statement: “I maintain that the conquest this time will not be by the sword but by preaching and ideology…” http://www.islamonline.net/fatwa/arabic/FatwaDisplay.asp?hFatwaID=2042

Al-Qaradhawi made similar statements on other occasions, on his weekly religious program on Al-Jazeera. He declared: “This means that the friends of the Prophet heard that two cities would be conquered by Islam, Romiyya and Constantinople, and the Prophet said that ‘Hirqil [i.e. Constantinople] would be conquered first.’ Romiyya is Rome, the capital of Italy, and Constantinople was the capital of the state of Byzantine Rome, which today is Istanbul. He said that Hirqil which is Constantinople would be conquered first and this is what happened…””

“Let’s Have a New Andalusia”

Al Qaeda has often mentioned Andalusia (southern Spain) as the western anchor of its dream pan-Islamic Caliphate--a territory stretching from Spain in the West to Indonesia in the East. Following the tragic events of 9/11, Osama bin Laden’s internationally televised speech mesmerized many Muslims with its religious and historical imagery, a powerful combination that magnified his standing with people who wanted to see him as a heroic spokesman for the weak against the strong. In the same broadcast, Ayman al Zawahiri, bin Laden’s deputy and the leader of the Islamic Jihad group, vowed that “the tragedy of al Andalus” would not be repeated. He was referring to the period widely considered the Islamic golden age in Andalusia, in Spain, which ended with Muslims being driven out of Europe by Christian armies in the fifteenth century.

More importantly, bin Laden believes that Andalusia is shorthand for Islamizing the world or, at least, for forcibly restoring the imperial glories and religious dynamism of Islam’s earlier centuries. Spain, he feels, was treacherously ripped from the hands of its rightful Muslim owners, and humiliatingly remains gripped in the talons of the Christians. Likewise, Palestine (obviously) must be reclaimed; the compromised crypto-Muslims running Arab/Muslim states must be purged (always remember that real Islamists think Nasser, of all people, was a Western stooge); and the borders of Islam must be returned to their greatest extent. History must be reversed: no more disgraceful retreats from the Andalusias of this world. Reference: Clash of Ideologies —The Making of the Christian and Islamic Worlds

In the October 11, 2007 Jerusalem Issue Brief: Al-Qaeda: The Next Goal Is to Liberate Spain from the Infidels Lt. Col. (res.) Jonathan Dahoah-Halevi wrote:

· Osama bin Laden has written: "We request of Allah...that the [Islamic] nation should regain its honor and prestige, should raise again the unique flag of Allah on all stolen Islamic land, from Palestine to Andalus." Bin Laden's mentor, Abdullah Azzam, established that the Islamic obligation to wage jihad in order to recover lost Islamic territories applies to Andalusia.
· Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood, has written that while Islam was twice evicted from Europe - from al-Andalus and from Greece - it is now in the process of returning.
· A children's magazine published by Hamas, the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, called on Palestinian children to restore the city of Seville to Islamic rule as well as the rest of what was once Islamic Spain.
· Israel, therefore, is a small link in the greater confrontation between radical Islam and the West. Accepting the Arabs' terms for a Middle East settlement, or even going so far as "liberating" Palestine from Israeli rule, will not be the last stop in the radical Islamic journey being led by the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda, which share the vision of spreading Islam all over the world.

Ayman al-Zawahiri, deputy of Osama bin Laden in the al-Qaeda leadership, in a new tape publicized on 20 September 2007, referred to the global aspirations of the Islamic Revolution:

O, our Muslim nation in the Maghreb [North Africa], zone of deployment for battle and jihad! The return of Andalus [today's Spain] to Muslim hands is a duty for the [Islamic] nation in general and for you in particular. You will not be able to achieve this except by purifying the Islamic Maghreb of the French and the Spanish who have once again returned, after your fathers and grandfathers had expelled them unsparingly in the way of Allah.

The Biblical Account of the Roman Empire in the Last Days

In the Biblical account of the last days, each of four successive powers had enemies who contested the right to rule, so, at the end of the Gentiles world power, there will be kingdoms and federations of nations who contest the authority of the Roman Empire. See: Things to Come – A Study in Biblical Eschatology by J. Dwight Pentecost.

There are numerous scholars who have and continue to study prophesy as laid out in the Bible. Needless to say there are variations in interpretation. However, the Bible remains the primary basis for the Judeo-Christian interpretation.

As the US approaches the 2008 election cycle, the issues receiving major attention among the contenders include: abortion, gay rights, immigration, health care and terrorism. There are of course significant differences among the candidates. The issue of “End Times” has not received much attention as it affects foreign relations. This is, as mentioned though out this article, the key theme of Muslims. Among the leading Republican candidates, Mitt Romney a Book of Mormon believer, would logically base his world view of the “End Times” not on the Bible but on the Book of Mormon which presents a different world view. A President’s world view will have an impact of foreign policy.

According to Pentecost, the first is the Northern Confederacy described in Ezekiel: 38:1-39:25. Gog and Magog are mentioned with those nations allied with them. The Prince of Rosh is called Gog in Ezekiel 38:3. It is to be understood that Gog is the name given to the leader of this confederacy and his land is called Magog, which is composed of three parts: Rosh, Meshech and Tubal. The identification of Rosh as modern Russia would seem to be well authenticated and generally accepted. It was predicated that allied with Magog “there would be many peoples with thee” (Ezek.38:15). The first nation federated with Russia will be Persia (Ezek. 38:5). This has reference to the ancient domain known as Iran. In addition it may include certain Arab states as Togarmah, which may include an extensive coalition of Asiatic powers.

The Second is the Kings of the East. According to Revelations 16:12, Israel-Palestine as the Epicenter, which will have become the epicenter of activity of the Roman leader and his armies, will be invaded by a great army coming from beyond the Euphrates known as the forces of “the Kings of the East”. It can be concluded that the second great opposing Gentile force will be composed of a coalition of nations from Asia, they will unite against the worldwide dominion by the head of the Roman Empire.

The third power in the conflict with Roman Empire is the King of the South, mentioned in Daniel 11:40. Evidentially this King of the South is allied with the King of the North to simultaneously invade. There is general agreement that the King of the South has reference to Egypt, inasmuch as Egypt is frequently referred to as the land of the South in Scripture.

Egypt also has a special place in minds and hearts of Christians, Jews, Moslems, and Arabs and where Egypt was mentioned as a holy place in their holy books.

In studying the alignments of the Gentile nations at the time of the tribulation period, we find the fourth alliance -- a ten kingdom federation of nations that become the final form of the Beast (Rev. 13:1-10).

Egypt is a towering enigma - sometimes monstrous, sometimes magnificent - that hovers above the rest of the Arab world like storm clouds over a dry prairie, bringing both life and destruction. Egypt is kaleidoscopic, ever-changing, and dazzling, simultaneously wonderful and woeful. It remains the big riddle of modern Arab politics - the birthplace of constitutional democracy, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the modern police state - but also it’s most vaunted prize.

The movements of these four allied powers are clearly sated in Judeo-Christian scripture and constitute one of the major themes of prophesy.

Hosni Mubarak Turned Pharaoh

The 79 years old President Mubarak of Egypt, military dictator turned pharaoh, has been in power since 1981 and was elected for six more years in 2005. Concerns about Mubarak’s health draw much greater attention to the question of who will next rule the nation of Egypt.

Restriction of Press Freedom

The latest reports about the deterioration of the health condition of Mr. Mubarak drew panic in stock markets in the region and hundreds of millions of dollars flew off Egypt over night to bank accounts overseas. The reports of the deteriorating health in the Egyptian press have led to the imprisonment of reporters. This has angered the populous as well as the human rights activists worldwide.

The trial of Ibrahim Eissa, editor-in-chief of the independent daily Al-Dostour, opened on October 1 only to be adjourned until 24 October.

In addition to harming the public interest by suggesting President Mubarak was unwell, Eissa is also accused of economic sabotage. Rumors about Mubarak's failing health allegedly caused panic among foreign investors and a $350 million slump in the stock exchange.

Ten Egyptian journalists received jail sentences last month as part of an apparent crackdown on dissent as Egypt prepares for an inevitable transition from President Hosni Mubarak. Eissa is among four editors recently sentenced to 12-months for libeling senior figures in the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP), including President Mubarak, Assistant Secretary- General Gamal Mubarak and Prime Minister Ahmed Nazif. The three other editors are Wael El-Ibrashi of Sawt Al-Umma, Adel Hammouda of Al-Fagr and Abdel-Halim Qandil, former editor of Al-Karama. They were granted bail for a LE 10,000 pending their appeal against the verdicts. A date for the appeal to be heard has yet to be set. Last year Eissa was also convicted of insulting President Mubarak, for which he was fined.

On October 4, Egypt released Essam el-Erian a senior Muslim Brotherhood leader, and nine other members of the group. The men were detained during escalating Egyptian crackdown on political dissidents. The group released was among a group of 17 arrested in mid-August.

The Impact of U.S. Support of Democracy in the Middle East

The United States sees itself as a beacon for democratic values, but Iranian and Arab reformers say its policies in the Middle East too frequently belie its ideals, making U.S. support for their cause a damaging liability. Repressive governments in the region, whether close allies or sworn foes of the United States, often exploit anti-American sentiment to accuse homegrown liberals of being stooges peddling a U.S.-Israeli agenda. Islamist movements do the same.

The relationship of the United States with Ethiopia represents a case in point as Barney Jopson reports in the Financial Times of October 10: Dismissive Ethiopia tests US indulgence.

“Following the attacks of September 11 2001, the administration of President George W. Bush forged an anti-terror pact with Addis Ababa. It was predicated on Ethiopia’s formidable military and intelligence capabilities and its position as a Christian-led country surrounded by Muslim and Arab states.”

“But the relationship has begun to resemble many of Washington’s alliances with troublesome client regimes, based mostly on geopolitical interest. Ethiopia, which received $283m (£139m, €200m) of military and humanitarian aid from Washington this year, looks increasingly like Pakistan or Egypt: an awkward bedfellow that the US has to support for security goals but one that pursues its own, sometimes brutal, agenda regardless of American pressure.”

“When the US objects to Ethiopian policies – such as a crackdown on political opponents that killed scores of people in 2005 and a scorched-earth campaign against separatist insurgents this year – it is ignored. When America gives implicit acquiescence – as it did over the Christmas invasion of Somalia and Ethiopia’s bitter border dispute with Eritrea – the US goes through the motions of diplomatic pressure and claims to have been rebuffed.

But the wisdom of the alliance is now under scrutiny, particularly since the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives passed a bill last week that would force Ethiopia to improve democracy and human rights or risk losing substantial aid.

Events in Turkey are also very disturbing. Turkey is one of the allies of the US and NATO. Incirlik air base in southern Turkey is a major cargo hub for U.S. and allied military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Turkey's Mediterranean port of Iskenderun is also used to ferry goods to American troops. Earlier this week a court in Istanbul has found two Turkish-Armenian journalists guilty of "insulting Turkishness" for reprinting an interview that referred to the mass killing of Ottoman Armenians by Turks in 1915 as genocide. The ruling came one day after the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US Congress approved a resolution that recognizes the killings as genocide, infuriating Ankara, which denies any such thing.

Rebels from the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), fighting for an independent homeland in southeastern Turkey, said on Friday they are moving back into Turkey from northern Iraq.

The rebels also warned in a statement that they will target Turkey's ruling AK Party and main opposition CHP.

The announcement comes as Turkey's government prepares to seek permission from parliament to carry out a cross-border offensive against an estimated 3,000 rebels it says are based in northern Iraq.

The PKK is considered a terrorist organization by Turkey, the United States and the European Union.

Iran sees this situation as an opportunity to further strengthen its regional position and has teamed up with Turkey to assist in removing a force of 5000 PUK soldiers from the area where Iran abuts Iraq in the Qandil Mountains. According to several news and intelligence sources they already have positioned troops some 7-8 km inside Iraq and have begun shelling the mountain hideouts. The situation for Turkey offers some big incentives. Not only do they get help in spanking the PUK, but have made it known that they have their eye on Kirkuk, an Iraqi city in the area that produces 40% of Iraq's oil output, and that Turkey had made claim to before.

For its part Iran also sees a chance grab a chunk of Northern Iraq for itself. In addition Iran wants to destroy forward intelligence positions the Israelis may have secretly placed among the Kurds to help them receive the earliest possible warning of an Iranian attack on Israel.

Knocking out these posts would give the Iranians two significant victories against the Israelis within the span of just a few months, the war in Lebanon being the other. The loss of this intelligence would no doubt reduce the possibility for a successful US-Israeli attack against Iran, too. Russian and Iranian intelligence experts are both predicting such an attack before the end of 2006.

Many observers believe it's already too late to stop the Turkey-Iran initiative. The question is whether it will blossom into yet another Mid-East war pitting the US, Iraq, and Israel against Iran, Turkey, and possibly Syria.

Students of prophecy should follow these developments closely. Turkey is felt by most to be a modern component along with Armenia of the Beth Togarmah mentioned in Ezekiel 38:6. Beth means house in Hebrew. Togarmah was a son of Gomer. The Armenians of today call themselves the House of Togarmah. The Turks (but not the Kurds, who are the ancient Medes of Media-Persia fame) are also included.

As long as Turkey is aligned with the west Ezekiel 38 can't happen. Bringing Turkey into the Moslem alliance against Israel would remove one more roadblock to its fulfillment.

Egyptian Support for Democracy?

The Egyptian government supports the evolution of democracy in Egypt in its rhetoric but continues to quash it in practice, reported a Freedom House study released on October 1. The narrative and scores from Countries at the Crossroads 2007 for Egypt are available online in English and Arabic.

“The pattern of events in Egypt over the past two years indicates an effort on the part of the government not only to retreat from promised reforms, but to further impose a repressive system,” said Thomas O. Melia, deputy executive director of Freedom House. “Given Egypt’s substantial influence on the rest of the region, the failure of President Mubarak to implement meaningful reforms in terms of its citizens’ political and civil liberties is particularly disappointing.”

The freedom of political parties and independent NGOs is becoming increasingly restricted, and the right to assembly is regularly violated, despite the Egyptian constitution’s recognition of this right. Security forces frequently crack down on opposition demonstrations, and arrest and even torture of participants is common.

A Dilemma is Faced by Supporters of Freedom

A serious dilemma arises because the last remaining opposition party in Egypt is the Muslim Brotherhood after imprisoning or prodding into exile Egypt’s leading secular opposition activists. This has resulted in the government using detentions and legal changes to neutralize the country's last surviving major political movement, the Muslim Brotherhood. The result is the support of the Muslim Brotherhood by the activist NGOs.

"Tyranny has reached unprecedented limits from any previous regime," said Mohammed Mahdi Akef, the supreme guide, or highest leader, of the Brotherhood, which the government has outlawed for decades but allowed to operate within narrow limits. "This is insane tyranny."

As Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote for the American Thinker on April 20, 2000 in the article The Muslim Brotherhood's Duping of America: “Neither the State Department nor the White House commented after U.S. House Majority Leader Stanley Hoyer met in Egypt with the Muslim Brotherhood's parliamentarian leader, Mohammed Saad el-Katatni. Hoyer and el-Katani discussed recent developments in the Middle East, and the "Brotherhood's vision."

This meeting took place just one day after the conclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood 5th Cairo Conference: The International Campaign Against US & Zionist Occupation, in which delegations from Hizbollah and Hamas took part. The participants cheered as Muslim Brotherhood General Guide Muhammad Mahdi 'Akef declared, "the devil Bush and his allies were now the ones sowing terror and aggression.

As the SocialistWorkeronline describes the conference in the article: Activists to meet at 5th Cairo Conference: “Egyptian opposition activists are calling on anti-war groups and unions to send delegates to the 5th Cairo Conference, 29 March-1 April, 2007. Over the last five years the Cairo Conference has brought together delegates from the international anti-war movement, trade unions, radical parties and the national liberation movements. It has defined the debate on resistance in the heart of the Arab world.” For more information go to Stop the War Coalition Online

Egyptian officials point to the group's high level of organization and violent past, and insist it remains the most dangerous force in Egypt. "The Muslim Brotherhood represents the framework for future violence," said Mohamed Abdel-Fattah Omar, a lawmaker from the ruling party and a former head of the state security apparatus.

In August and September, police raided the homes and meetings of Brotherhood leaders, putting behind bars five of the 12 officials in the group's decision-making guidance council. Two have since been released for health reasons.

Despite the ban, the Brotherhood has provided clinics, youth camps and other services that have won the organization support among the poor and provided a civic model for the armed Islamic movements Hezbollah and Hamas. The Brotherhood draws support among Egypt's middle class through its strong presence in technical and professional unions.

The government is also writing its crackdown into law. Constitutional changes pushed through by the government after the Brotherhood's strong showing in 2005 shut out its members in upper house elections this June. Next year, the government promises to present a new anti-terrorism code that the Brotherhood expects to be used for further crackdowns against it.

Egyptians cite U.S. pressure in 2005 as the stimulus for a short-lived flourishing of democratic opposition. That year, President Bush challenged Egypt in his State of the Union address "to show the way toward democracy in the Middle East." Since making peace with Israel in 1979, Egypt has been the No. 2 recipient of U.S. foreign aid.

Mubarak allowed other candidates to challenge his 2005 reelection bid. Egypt's fragmented secular opposition groups made tentative alliances with one another, and with the Brotherhood.

By 2006, with Hamas's victory in Palestinian elections leading U.S. officials to have second thoughts about democracy in the Middle East, and the U.S. military presence in Iraq growing ever more troubled, American priorities in the Middle East shifted again, from promoting democracy to maintaining allies.

Egypt is a police-and army-dominated modern Arab security state achieving brisk economic reforms, high growth rates, and massive job expansion in a manner that other Arab countries can only envy, however these are without attempting any serious political reform. This has occurred, as we continue to grapple with the enigma of an entire region of nearly 300 million Arabs who have not been able to achieve or sustain a single breakthrough to credible democracy.

Impact of the Possible Fall of the Mubarak Government

There is no apparent chain of command or democratic institutions that would facilitate the transfer of power to the next president and hence the possible fall of the Mubarak government could send shock waves throughout the globe; Commentators suggest unnerving scenarios such as would an ambitious general stage another coup or even would Egypt witness another Khomeini-style revolution?

On the world arena, nothing is more disturbing to political analysts, policymakers and stockowners in the U.S. and Western capitals than waking up one day to the breaking news coming from the Middle East that one of the long assumed allies has been toppled. The fall could be by a coup or a popular uprising of angry masses creating chaos, panic and uncertainty in international markets.

The U.S. Supports Egypt as an Allay

Egypt, as a currently secular Islamic country is looked upon as a key allay of the U.S and West against radical Islam. Egypt and Jordan are the only countries having signed “peace accords” with Israel. Egypt plays an important role in the potential negotiations on the Israel-Palestine process. The U.S. currently provides extensive military aid to Israel and Egypt and is currently planning to provide additional weapon systems to Egypt. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will visit Egypt for talks with President Hosni Mubarak on October 16 as a part of a Middle East tour that will include the Palestinian territories, Israel and Jordan ahead of a peace summit in the United States next month.

The U.S. is Providing Additional Weapons to Egypt

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress earlier this month of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Egypt of STINGER Block 1 Missiles as well as associated equipment and services. "Egypt will use the STINGER missiles to upgrade its air defense capability" - that's air defense for mobile forces. That Egypt keeps practicing moving those mobile forces towards Israel's border is apparently not a concern. This proposed sale ostensibly will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that has been and continues to be an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.

Door is Open for Revolution in Egypt

The current situation in Egypt is setting the stage for a revolution, coup, and even potentially the full takeover of the government by the fundamentalist Islamist Muslim Brotherhood.

The Mubarak’s regime has grown very unpopular and detested by many if not most Egyptians. The disparities between the super-poor and the super-rich are widening everyday. Prices of basic food items and commodities are skyrocketing. This situation manifested itself in an angry, restless, anxious and irrational behavior that reflected on Egyptian society witnessing a high wave of violent crimes: such as rape, murder of spouses, parents and children, a high rate of divorce, drug use, white collar crimes, road rage, embezzlement, military service desertion, domestic violence and countless other crimes.

The large population of young educated, jobless, unmarried youth is alienated and getting more frustrated and angry everyday and provide the fodder for revolution.

The Significance of the US-hosted Middle East summit in Annapolis

The summit is expected to be held in Annapolis in November. The sides have begun work on a joint statement to be presented at the conference's opening. The events in Egypt will have a major impact on the newly reinitiated Middle East negotiations.

The key question is where exactly the parties are determined to set their so-called "red lines," their nonnegotiable bedrock stands, on the three fundamental final-status issues expected to be under discussion:

· The territorial issue (the borders between Israel and a future Palestinian state, and the impact this will have on West Bank settlements);
· The status of Jerusalem, including those holy places on and adjacent to the Temple Mount; and
· The so-called "right of return" for Palestinian "refugees" (the term itself is debatable) living outside Israel and the Palestinian areas.

Indeed, if anyone drew a red line over Jerusalem in 2000, it was Yasser Arafat, who adamantly refused to even consider a compromise on the Old City and its Temple Mount, most notoriously denying the Jewish historical connection to the site and rejecting a Clinton proposal that Israel enjoy a bare-minimum symbolic sovereignty "underneath" the Mount.

The Temple Mount

The status and impact is most pronounced on the issue to be addressed at the Summit is the future of the Temple Mount. This issue has an impact on Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

The Temple Mount also known as the Noble Sanctuary is a religious site in the Old City of Jerusalem.

The Temple Mount is the holiest site for Judaism. The Jewish Temple in Jerusalem stood there: the First Temple (built c. 967 BCE, destroyed c. 586 BCE by the Babylonians), and the Second Temple (rebuilt c. 516 BCE, destroyed in the siege of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 CE). According to a commonly held belief in Judaism, it is to be the site of the final Third Temple, to be rebuilt with the coming of the Jewish Messiah.

Among the Christian events occurring at the Second Temple during the life of Jesus are those recorded in Mark 12:41 – Mark 13:9

And he sat down opposite the treasury, and watched the multitude putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. And a poor widow came, and put in two copper coins, which make a penny. And he called his disciples to him, and said to them, "Truly, I say to you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury. For they all contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, her whole living." MK: 1241-44 (RSV)

And as he came out of the temple, one of his disciples said to him, "Look, Teacher, what wonderful stones and what wonderful buildings!" And Jesus said to him, "Do you see these great buildings? There will not be left here one stone upon another, that will not be thrown down." And as he sat on the Mount of Olives opposite the temple, Peter and James and John and Andrew asked him privately, "Tell us, when will this be, and what will be the sign when these things are all to be accomplished?" And Jesus began to say to them, "Take heed that no one leads you astray. Many will come in my name, saying, 'I am he!' and they will lead many astray. And when you hear of wars and rumors of wars, do not be alarmed; this must take place, but the end is not yet. For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; there will be earthquakes in various places, there will be famines; this is but the beginning of the birth-pangs. "But take heed to yourselves; for they will deliver you up to councils; and you will be beaten in synagogues; and you will stand before governors and kings for my sake, to bear testimony before them. Mark 13:1-9 (RSV)

This is a significant passage as in 70 C.E. the Temple was destroyed. Jesus went on to prophesy of events to occur.

Known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary, it is also the site of two major Muslim religious shrines, the Dome of the Rock (built c. 690) and Al-Aqsa Mosque (built c. 710).

The Temple Mount is traditionally regarded by Muslims as the third most important Islamic holy site, after Mecca and Medina. The primary reason for its importance is the Muslim belief that in 621, Muhammad arrived there after a miraculous nocturnal journey aboard the winged steed named Buraq, to take a brief tour of heaven with the Archangel Gabriel. This happened according to the Qur’an during Muhammad's time in Mecca, years before Muslims conquered Jerusalem (638).

It is one of the most contested religious sites in the world. Under the Jordanian rule of Eastern Jerusalem between 1948 and 1967, Jews were forbidden from entering the Old City. Both Israel and the Palestinian Authority claim sovereignty over the site, which remains a key issue in the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Israeli government has granted management of the site to a Muslim Council (Waqf).

Islam maintains that there never was any such thing as the Holy Temple standing on the Temple Mount. For years a concentrated effort was made to obliterate any vestige of evidence from the site.

There is much more at stake here than simply the destruction of precious remnants of the Holy Temple. It has become clear that the abandonment of the Temple Mount to total Muslim control has been promised by Israel and is guaranteed to figure prominently in any eventual treaty or agreement which may be occur during or following the Annapolis Summit.

The Bible clearly indicates that all humanity will be uplifted to a new and unparalleled level of unity when the Holy Temple is rebuilt. “It shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of the house of the LORD shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and shall be raised above the hills; and all the nations shall flow to it, and many peoples shall come, and say: "Come, let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his paths." For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.” (Isaiah 2:2-3 RSV). In Isaiah's messianic prophetic vision of the lion lying with lamb, he further states that "They shall not hurt, nor destroy, in all My holy mountain."

The Sanhedrin

The Sanhedrin is the name given in the mishna to the council of seventy-one Jewish sages who constituted the supreme court and legislative body in Judea during the Roman period. It continued to function for more than four hundred years after the destruction of the Second Temple and there have been several orthodox attempts to re-establish it since that time. The current attempt to re-establish the Sanhedrin is generally referred to as the "nascent Sanhedrin", or the "developing Sanhedrin". The Sanhedrin is again meeting since 2005 and is planning for the building of the third Temple.

For hundreds of years after the destruction of the Temple, the Sanhedrin assembled in various cities. In 270 C.E. it moved to Tiberias. In 358 C.E. Roman Emperor Theodosius disbanded the Sanhedrin and confiscated their property, as a reaction to previous emperor Julian's pro-Jewish stance. The modern Jewish Calendar was adopted at clandestine, and maybe last meeting, in the caves of Mount Berenice overlooking the city. The Sanhedrin complex is believed to have been converted into a Christian structure shortly after that.

Israel Antiquities Authority excavations in Tiberias in 2005 may have uncovered the site of a structure used by the Sanhedrin, researchers believe. The site could have also have been used for writing the Jerusalem Talmud.

The Muslim Brotherhood

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran a firm believer in "Shia revolutionary thought,” was in New York; there Ahmadinejad offered up his attacks while extolling his vision of Islamic global domination. Ahmadinejad may not be the most powerful individual in Iran, as that role is reserved for the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khomeini. Despite this Ahmadinejad has, since his election as sixth president on June 28, 2005, been involved in implementing programs which have added to the instability of the Middle East. While the world watches the events in Iran, Iraq, China and Russia, it is important to consider the potential of Egypt adding to further instability.

It could be argued that since Ahmadinejad's central message failed to register on his Western audiences that his visit to America was a failure. The fact that no media organs felt it necessary to analyze what he was talking about could be seen as a clear sign that no one is interested in buying what he is selling. But this is a dangerous argument, for it misses a basic truth.

Ahmadinejad is not interested in convincing the US government or even the majority of Americans to convert to Islam. He is interested in convincing adherents of totalitarian Islam and potential converts to the cause that they are on the winning side. He is interested in demoralizing foes of totalitarian Islam within the Islamic world and so causing them to give up any thoughts of struggle. In this goal he is no different from any of his Sunni counterparts in Saudi Arabia, al-Qaida, the Muslim Brotherhood operating worldwide, Hamas, or their sister organizations throughout the Islamic world and indeed throughout the West. Remember, the goal remains the same—establishing the Islamic kingdom of God.

Throughout the world, Islamic ideologues are aggressively spreading their message of global domination. In mosques, on the Internet, on television, in schools, hospitals and prisons, Islamic preachers can be found propagating the cause of Islamic domination. And aside from Iran, no regime, including the Saudi regime, is immune from the pressures of the message.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s Political Platform Reveled

As Maggie Michael of the Associated Press in her article of October 11, 2007, Egypt's Brotherhood party details platform akin to that of Iran comments: “The Muslim Brotherhood has laid down its first detailed political platform, which would bar women and Christians from becoming Egypt's president and establish a board of Muslim clerics to oversee the government, reminiscent of Iran's Islamic state.”

The platform has dismayed secular prodemocracy activists who had cautiously hoped the Brotherhood was becoming more moderate and who supported the movement in the face of an unprecedentedly tough government crackdown against it.

The document also complicates the debate in Egypt over how to deal with the Brotherhood, which proved its widespread popularity in 2005 parliament elections.

The Brotherhood in recent years has increasingly touted itself as a reform movement, insisting it wants a democratic playing field and an end to the autocratic rule of President Hosni Mubarak's regime. Some secular activists have said that, given the Brotherhood's popularity, there can't be real democracy in Egypt unless the group has a seat at the political table.

But the platform illustrated the dominance of a more hard-line trend in the Brotherhood, or Dawah - often referred to as the act of "preaching Islam"- over a minority of moderates who call for a civic government that respects Islamic principles.

The Free World today finds itself embroiled in an ideological war for its very survival.

The Islamists whether Shi'ite and Sunni are followers of a totalitarian ideology based on Islam which tells them that Allah wishes to rule the world through them. In no way does this imply that all Islamists are terrorists or seek to engage in war, terrorism whether it be in the form of suicide bombers, cyber-terrorism or economic Jihad are just among the tools and tactics being employed. The goal remains that of establishing the Islamic kingdom of God on earth. Israel is a central front – the epicenter in this war. Given the weakness of Western support for the Jews, jihadists see attacking Israel as a strategic tool for eroding the West's ideological defenses and shoring up their supporters throughout the world.

The thing of it is that aside from blind narcissism, there is a reason that the West ignores the dangers facing it. The Western media ignored Ahmadinejad's message, just as it has insistently ignored the messages of bin Laden and Fatah throughout the years, because Westerners have a hard time believing that anyone would want to abide by the Islamic world view which denies mankind's desire for freedom.

But no matter how ugly an ideology is, in the absence of real competition it gains adherents and power. The only way to ensure that jihadists' demonic views are defeated is by stridently defending and upholding the fundamental principles on which the Free World is based. And the West hasn't even begun to take up this challenge.

As a result, it has handed its enemies two victories already. It has demoralized its potential allies in the Islamic world, and it has failed to rally its own people to defend themselves.

In spite of what the West would like to believe, Ahmadinejad and his allies from Ramallah to Waziristan, from Gaza to Kandahar to Baghdad, are not negotiating. They are fighting. Rather than ignore them or seek to find nonexistent common ground, we must defeat them - first and foremost on the battleground of ideas.

The Muslim Brotherhood Organization

The Muslim Brotherhood (“MB”) organization describes itself as a political and social revolutionary movement; it was founded in March 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al-Banna, who objected to Western influence and called for return to an original Islam.

The Brotherhood is an expansive and secretive society with followers in more than 70 countries, dedicated to creating a global Islamic order that would isolate women and punish nonbelievers. Its members and supporters founded al Qaeda, as well as one “of the largest college student groups in the United States.”

Al-Banna had connections to Sufism, and he used the sufi-tariqa model for organizing the Brotherhood while rejecting Sufi “superstitions.” At first, the Muslim Brotherhood concentrated mainly on moral and social reforms, establishing educational and welfare programs. Then, following its rapid growth, it became more politically active and founded a secret military arm. It developed a tightly knit organization with a network of branches, subdivided into secret cell groups, with a missionary network that spread into Syria, Palestine and the Sudan. Members were recruited from rural and lower class backgrounds, as well as from the urban middle classes, and they received intensive ideological and physical training.

Al-Banna outlined a gradualist strategy in three stages: the Propaganda Stage (preparation), the Organization Stage (aimed at educating the people), and finally, the Action Stage. While tactics might change, the strategic objectives of the Brotherhood remain unchanged: to receive explicit political recognition so as to be able to operate freely in the social, economic and political arena, and to implement Shariah in an Islamic state.

The strategy of al-Banna has and is being implemented today in Europe and the rest of the world. We are witnessing the effect of the final stages in Europe. He could only have dreamed of the success we are seeing today.

The Project

According to Sylvain Besson, an investigative journalist for the daily newspaper, Time, in Geneva, in his book of “La conquete de L’Occident: Le projet secret des Islamistes“ (The conquest of the occident: The secret project of the Islamists), Swiss authorities made a worrying discovery at the time of a searching carried out in the villa of Egyptian banker Youssef Nada in Lugano in November 2001. Swiss investigators discovered “The Project,” an ambitious strategy intended “to establish the kingdom of God over the whole world.”

“The Project” is a fourteen-page leaflet, dated December 1982, calling for the Muslim Brotherhood’s conquest of the world. It is a detailed roadmap to attain this objective. The Muslim Brothers must infiltrate existing institutions, rather than create their own. It calls for a guerilla war against Israel in the Palestinian territories and support to diverse armed Muslim groups from Bosnia to the Philippines. Swiss investigators confirm that the Project is the proof of the Muslim Brotherhood’s role in supporting and inspiring the “worldwide jihad.”

In the 21st century, many Western politicians do not appear to understand the true agenda and ideology of Islamism. They mistakenly believe that negotiation with Islamists is possible, as if these do not have an intransigent agenda, designed to infiltrate or weaken the West. Islamists have failed to influence so-called most "Muslim countries" to accept their ideology, yet the West accepts Islamists' "advice" at its own peril.

The Muslim Brotherhood Plan for Egypt

According to the The Muslim Brotherhood (IKHWAN) Official English Website on October 3 A handbook for overthrowing governments like the Buramese, lessons to be learnt they have a plan of action for Egypt.

They reference a BBC article by Foreign Affairs correspondent Paul Reynolds handbook for overthrowing governments and regimes like the one in Burma http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7021567.stm , which they found very interesting because some factors are the key for any successful revolution that wants real change with historical examples from around the globe.

Those key factors are the following:
· Widespread public protests, bringing in many different social and economic groups
· An opposition leadership with clear ideas around which people can rally
· The ability to use the media in some form to get a message across
· A mechanism for undermining the existing regime - whether by internal coup in the case of a military junta, the emergence of reformers, or the simple exhaustion of an existing government leading to its collapse
· External pressure from key countries able to exert influence

“Can it be implemented? Well of course, look if you review these factors you will find that they can be implemented in Egypt. It will depend only on the last two factors to implement a miraculous internal coup "despite we do not have a military Junta now” and external pressure which may develop through the NGOs and Islamist countries.”

“We do not have yet united opposition leadership ideas, the MB are in Jail plus many won’t like their political program especially when it concerns the Presidency and its interaction with the religious leadership, that reminds me with the System in Iran, Ayman Nour’s program and ideas were accepted by many but he is in Jail too not to mention that after all those years he got less supporters than before, the rest from opposition from the leftists "despite their late activity in the workers" protests", the Nasserists and Wafadists seem to live in the past.”

Conclusion

It is important to watch the current events occurring daily in the lenses of the following:
· Political,
· Economic, and
· Ideological

World events will seem confusing without a firm understanding of your ideological belief and understanding the End Times prophesies as presented in Christianity and Islam. As we recently witnessed in the speeches in New York of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad they were predominately about ideology. Similarly the case applies to the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, and the other ideologists. The West failed to read and take to heart the writings of Marx, Lenin, Mao and Hitler. Please believe what they are saying.

On their first day of class at the Communist party's management school in Shanghai, students make a pilgrimage to a small museum commemorating the 1921 meeting of 13 activists who founded what has become the world's largest political organization.

With only 73.4m members – less than 5% of the population, the Chinese Communist party does more than just rule a country. Besides having a grip on every arm of government, the media and the military, the party now also presides over large and cash-rich state businesses, a control exercised by monopolizing the selection of senior executives.

Conflicts since 1950 with over 10,000 Fatalities
40,000,000 Red China, 1949-76 (outright killing, manmade famine, Gulag)
10,000,000 Soviet Bloc: late Stalinism, 1950-53; post-Stalinism, to 1987 (mostly Gulag)
4,000,000 Ethiopia, 1962-92: Communists, artificial hunger, genocides
3,800,000 Zaire (Congo-Kinshasa): 1967-68; 1977-78; 1992-95; 1998-present

In a different perspective, some 11,000,000 Muslims have been violently killed since 1948, of which 35,000, or 0.3 percent, died during the sixty years of fighting Israel, or just 1 out of every 315 Muslim fatalities. In contrast, over 90 percent of the 11 million who perished were killed by fellow Muslims. Reference: Arab-Israeli Fatalities Rank 49th by Gunnar Heinsohn and Daniel Pipes FrontPageMagazine.com October 8, 2007

Although Israel is aware of the threat by Iran, so to are the surrounding countries. The days where speeches by Presidents Nasser and Sadat would in the past stir excitement across the world are gone. The weak position of Egypt today presents a great threat to the future of the Arab world. Today, even Hamas' leaders in Gaza take the liberty to openly ignore Egyptian requests and demands. Such are the events transpiring prior to opening of the Summit.

Failure to adhere to fundamental principles of our Judeo-Christian beliefs will be the signs of weakness that will only strengthen the hands of those who have already declared that we are their enemies.

Four ideologies – Judeo/Christian based on the Bible, Islam based on the Qur’an/Hadith, Mormonism based on the Book of Mormon, and none of the above. They can not all be right, you have to make a decision, the future depends on it—it is chunch time.

Given this equation, any near term trigger event in Egypt would garner at least the same global attention as any other Middle East regional conflict. The red line is not “peace” in our time, but where will the West and Israel stand on Jerusalem and the “Temple Mount”.

David J. Jonsson is the author of Clash of Ideologies —The Making of the Christian and Islamic Worlds, Xulon Press 2005. His new book: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance (Salem Communications (May 30, 2006). He received his undergraduate and graduate degrees in physics. He worked for major corporations in the United States and Japan and with multilateral agencies that brought him to more that fifteen countries with significant or majority populations who are Muslim. These exposures provided insight into the basic tenants of Islam as a political, economic and religious system. He became proficient in Islamic law (Shariah) through contract negotiation and personal encounter. David can be reached at: djonsson2000@yahoo.co.uk

Labels:

Monday, October 15, 2007

The Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance Aligns Against Jerusalem - David Jonsson.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Indonesia – Russia Opens the Pacific Front - David J. Jonsson

David J. Jonsson
September 16, 2007

As Sun Tsu said:

“Whoever occupies the battleground first and awaits the enemy will be at ease;
whoever occupies the battleground afterward and must race to the conflict will
be fatigued. Thus one who excels at warfare compels men and is not compelled by
other men.”

“Thus the highest realization of warfare is to attack the enemy’s plans; next is
to attack their alliances; next to attack their army; and the lowest is to
attack their fortified cities.”

Vladimir Putin has the goal of reestablishing Russia as a world power and returning the world to a multi-polar world. Russia’s alliance with China and Iran with their global alliances through economic and military alliances presents the strategic basis for control and the elimination of the hegemony of the United States. The alliances span both the Sunni and Shia branches of Islam as exemplified by the relations with Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Indonesia and Iran.

While the politicians and the press are focused on war in Iraq, scant attention is being directed to the greater geopolitical events occurring worldwide. The battleground is already being occupied by the enemies of freedom and liberty. The Russian deal to supply weapons to Indonesia descended on the APEC summit table like a slammed fist.

Russia along with their partners is utilizing alliances in the: political, transportation, military, technology, economic, natural resource and energy sectors to accomplish the goal.

Russia seeks access to the Mediterranean, the Indian Ocean, the Pacific and the Caribbean.

In the space of a few years Russia has managed to create a network of relations that, at a diplomatic level, have launched the Kremlin as an irreplaceable reference point for the central-Asiatic republics, for some middle-east countries, the Pacific Basin and the Caribbean. The network of alliances between Russia, Iran, China, India, Venezuela, Cuba and now Indonesia - motivated exclusively by convenience - have produced an acceleration of economic and financial integration projects.

Past differences between Russia and the larger Asiatic nations seem now to be overcome due to the will to reach new common objectives. From this point of view, the intention of the Shanghai Pact’s members of including Iran amongst the cooperation organizations, Russia and China’s UNSC veto and opposition to imposing sanctions in order to discourage Teheran from pursuing the enrichment of uranium, and the profitable Russian-Iranian cooperation in economic and military fields represent the most significant examples of the sharing of political strategies that antagonize the West.

While the leaders who attended the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Sydney in September 2007 seemed to be united in their call for action on challenging issues such as global warming and economic development, in fact a cauldron of unpredictable discord was simmering just below the surface of smiles and handshakes.

While Vladimir Putin arrived at the APEC meetings to open the Russian initiative in the Pacific with the signing of weapons and energy deals with Indonesia, the United States and Japan seemed intent on also creating a new military block in Asia. They have enlisted Australia, India and Singapore as their allies, and the five nations were concluding their first joint military exercises in the Bay of Bengal just as the APEC conference was winding down. In Sydney, the United States, Japan and Australia held separate security talks at which the main topic was how to engage with India.

The leading members of this alliance have described their cooperation as focused on their "common interests," and have stressed that it is not aimed against China. Yet there is little evidence to prove this argument. No one knows what scenarios will arise in the future.

Is the emerging Asian security paradigm a threat to China? “The "Malabar CY 07-2" naval exercises in the Bay of Bengal held in the first week of September, 2007 undoubtedly represent a major shift in India's strategic security perceptions. Only the US and Indian navies had been participating in the 12 Malabar series of naval exercises held usually off the west coast of India so far. But Malabar CY 07-2 is different in two ways. First, the size of it; with the participation of nearly 30 warships and 200 aircraft from five nations- Australia, Japan, India, the U.S., and Singapore – makes it the largest ever naval exercise in this part of the world. Second, in a clear departure from the past, qualitatively the exercise is trying out entirely new set of war games in the Bay of Bengal off Andaman.”

The Cold War should serve as a mirror in this present situation. The confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union in the early years of the Cold War resembles in some respects the situation that is emerging today.

The South China Sea was the scene of 13 resource-related military clashes in the 1990s, nine of which involved China.

Political Alliances

Russia – Indonesia
During a one-day visit to Indonesia on September 7, 2007 President Vladimir Putin witnessed the signing of a $1 billion arms deal that many analysts see as part of a broader Russian effort to restore diplomatic and military clout in the Asia-Pacific region and make some money, as well.

Indonesia, which until 2005 was under a U.S. arms embargo because of human rights abuses, will purchase Russian tanks, military helicopters and submarines. Last month, Russia said it would sell six fighter jets to Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, as part of the deal.

"The deals signed in Indonesia are part of a Kremlin strategy to expand its influence in Asia and the Middle East," said Alexei Makarkin, an analyst at the Center for Political Technologies in Moscow. "Russia is trying to pursue a multipolar policy in the world and considers itself to be one of its poles."

"We agreed to develop our cooperation in energy, mining, aviation and the telecommunications sector," said Putin, who stopped in the Indonesian capital, Jakarta, on his way to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Australia. "There's also a good perspective in defense and military."

For Indonesia, the country's defense minister said, the deal comes with none of the strings that encumber similar purchases from the United States and Western Europe.

"Requirements for purchasing arms from Western countries are complicated, with preconditions attached, such as human rights, accountability, not to mention licensing," Juwono Sudarsono told reporters in Jakarta. "In our past experience with Britain, we were not allowed to use Scorpion tanks in Aceh, even though we were facing armed separatists."

Under Putin, Russia has become determined to project its military, diplomatic and energy power into the Pacific, an area it neglected after the fall of the Soviet Union. Besides the arms deal, Russian companies have signed billions of dollars worth of deals in the mining and energy sectors with Indonesian companies, Russian officials said.

So it seems that the likes of Indonesia is certainly being subverted into the Moscow-Beijing Axis as the likes of Comrade Czar Vladimir Putin along with Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono are signing at least a one billion dollar arms deal. Indonesia is one country in the South Pacific that has one of the largest Muslim populations.

Many Indonesian Muslims are being subverted to be supporting radical "Islamist" leanings through such groups such as the "al-Qaedish" Jemaah Islamiah where it's derived from the "Islamist" Darul Islam (House of Islam), and entrenched itself in the Indonesian Muslim populations since the days of the Indonesian National Revolution, where members of the Soviet-backed Socialist Party of Indonesia attempted to create an "Indonesian Soviet Republic". While the openly "Islamist" movements such as Darul Islam wanted to establish an Islamic theocracy. Even members of the Indonesian Communist Party participated, now banned from Indonesia. But Indonesia in spite of the various governments trying to lean "pro-Western", Indonesia remains a target for recruitment for the Moscow-Beijing Axis. The arms purchase provides that very case.

The Russian – China Alliance

This is exemplified initially in what was known as the Beijing-Moscow Alliance. The first-ever joint Chinese-Russian military exercises took place in Mid-August 2005.

The exercises were small in scale — but huge in implication. They indicated a further warming of the "strategic partnership" that Moscow and Beijing struck back in 1996.

More importantly, they signal the first real post-Cold War steps, beyond inflammatory rhetoric, by Russia and China to balance — and, ultimately, diminish — U.S. power across Asia. If America doesn't take strategic steps to counter these efforts, it will lose influence to Russia and China in an increasingly important part of the world.

In Russia 2007 will be the Year of China. Beijing buys 90 per cent of its military hardware from Russia and insists on building an oil pipeline between the two countries. The two parties are working together to carve out their spheres of influence in Central Asia. China accounts for 40 per cent of Russia's total military sales.

China’s military needs Russian technology and the two neighbors have been quietly collaborating on ballistic missile research, nuclear technologies and space exploration. Russia and China are also seeking and obtaining western technology in a multitude of ways.

France and Germany, for example, seemed happy to allow Dubai's ruling family to buy its stake in EADS maker of Airbuses and Eurofighters. The fund will not be seeking board representation. Not that it would be able to get it. Appointing EADS directors is a privilege reserved for the members of the shareholder pact that controls 58 per cent of the shares. Rather, as with Dubai International Capital (DIC's) recent purchase of HSBC stock, the strategy is to take long-term stakes in the world's largest companies. The acquisition of shares of HSBC makes it “one of the leading shareholders” in HSBC, Europe's biggest bank. DIC is the private-equity arm of conglomerate Dubai Holding, founded by Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, who is prime minister and vice president of the United Arab Emirates and ruler of Dubai.

Political considerations cannot be ruled out though. The 5 per cent stake in EADS held by Russian bank VTB looks to be aimed partly at winning sub-assembly work and hence technology transfer for Russia. There are signs that Qatar and China may also seek a closer relationship too. For Dubai, the inside track on EADS-owned Airbus wouldn't hurt. Airbus is the main supplier of aircraft to the Emirates airline and Dubai is hoping to expand its position as a major aircraft maintenance hub.

Similarly, in the last few months Russia and China have adopted similar positions on several issues in opposition to the United States, and their relationship is taking on greater weight, especially at the regional level.

For example, whilst the Washington has threatened Iran with sanctions if it does not give up its nuclear program, Beijing and Moscow have threatened to use their veto power to block them if they come up at the United Nations.

On September 10, Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in the Emirates' capital Abu Dhabi on Monday morning for what is his first official visit there in the 35 year history of Russian-Emirates relations.

"Putin's historic visit to the UAE is part of Russia's stated intention of bolstering ties with Arab and Muslim countries," the main daily English language newspaper Gulf News reported Monday and added that trade exchange between Russia and Emirates is expected to reach a record US$800 million this year.

The two sides will "naturally, discuss the military-technical cooperation," Russian presidential aide Prikhodko said without providing details, but suggested that the Emirates might be interested in Russian air defense weapons.

The Russian – China - Iran alliance

The cooperation between Moscow and Teheran in a variety of important sectors is becoming more and more intense but is far from representing an exclusive partnership, Moscow’s aim is to develop a network of alliances, China and India, in order to propose a valid alternative to US economical and political hegemony.

A TEHRAN MOSCOW BEIJING AXIS AGAINST THE WEST on GlobalSecurity.org 3 September 2001, Volume 4, Number 33 reported: Expediency Council Chairman and former President Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani described trilateral cooperation between Moscow, Tehran, and Beijing as "strategic" during a meeting with the new Russian ambassador, Aleksandr Maryasov, according to state television on 13 August. He added that this three-way cooperation could serve as a counterweight against the West and the U.S., and it would alter international conditions, according to IRNA.

On September 4, 2007 Iran's influential Assembly of Experts elected Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani as its chairman in a move that could strengthen the pragmatic former president's position in the political hierarchy. "Legally speaking, Mr. Rafsanjani is now in a higher position than Ayatollah [Ali] Khamenei [the supreme leader] but it is early to say how he will use this position," said Ahmad Zeidabadi, a political analyst.

Red World: Venezuela, Latin America's newest socialist republic moving is toward single-party dictatorship and strategic partner of Moscow, Beijing, Tehran and Havana

The Caribbean provides access to the soft underbelly of the United States and is another strategic choke point for shipping to the US.

Chavez is chummy with almost anyone who opposes the U.S. -- plain and simple. Some of these ties are quite troubling. He clearly idolizes Castro the most, inspiring some to dub him Castro's Mini-Yo (Mini-Me).

Venezuela is helping to keep the failed Cuban system on life support by providing some 50,000 barrels of oil per day at concessionary prices in exchange for a bevy of Cuban teachers, doctors and sports instructors. Chavez seems willing to increase oil deliveries to Cuba with every photo op he gets with his valued mentor and strategic adviser, Castro, to burnish his leftist Latino credentials. As such, some expect oil deliveries to Cuba to double this year.

But Cuba is also providing intelligence and security officers to Venezuela. They've helped Chavez develop an improved intelligence capability -- and undermine the political opposition in true Cuban style.

Cuban military advisers are also present, making Venezuelan officers increasingly anxious about the creeping influence of Havana in military matters. Caracas is also sending officers to Cuba for training -- and, undoubtedly, political indoctrination.

Like Castro, who partnered with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, Chavez is making common cause with other American enemies -- including the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism, Iran.

Chavez meets with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad regularly in Venezuela and Iran. Last year, they revealed plans for a $2 billion joint fund, part of which will be used as a "mechanism for liberation" against U.S. allies. The concern in the relationship is Caracas may be looking to Tehran for help with a so-called "peaceful" nuclear program. In addition to supporting Iran's nuclear bid in international forums, Chavez has publicly expressed interest in nuclear energy.

Thankfully, other regional states with civilian nuclear power programs, such as Argentina and Brazil, have shunned Venezuela, seeing helping Chavez as risky. But Iran, ever eager to keep the U.S. off-balance, might just be willing to lend a hand.

And don't forget about (already) nuclear North Korea. Venezuelan and North Korean military delegations have traipsed back and forth on numerous occasions between Caracas and Pyongyang. Both sides deny anything other than routine exchanges. Although nothing has yet materialized, North Korean ballistic missiles could be on Venezuela's shopping list. Pyongyang is the world's most prodigious proliferators of missiles; Venezuela might be in the market for short-range Scuds or medium-range No-Dongs. With North Korea possibly backing down on their nuclear enrichment activities, only time will tell how these relations will develop.

The potentially unemployed North Korean scientists may find a new life in Iran, Syria or Venezuela.

Venezuela isn't known to be supporting Islamic terrorism -- at the moment. But it does seem to turn a blind eye, at a minimum, to the FARC and ELN narco-terrorists and other regional paramilitary groups that cross the border to regroup and resupply in Venezuela.

Support, of course, in the future may go well beyond the provision of safe haven. Venezuela has been accused of providing both the FARC and ELN with older-model small arms and ammunition.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) believes Venezuelan airports and ports have become major cocaine trafficking routes from Colombia into the Caribbean, and onward to both the U.S. and Europe.

Although not pointing a finger at the central government, the DEA believes that these drug flights to the Caribbean from Venezuela have doubled in recent years. Counterpunching, Chavez recently charged the DEA with trafficking drugs.

With these economic ties, the People's Republic is also building military and political ties in the Latin world - especially with regimes like Venezuela's Hugo Chavez which are hostile to U.S. policies.

One of the most eye-popping elements of Chavismo is Venezuela's arms purchases. Flush with oil profits, Chavez, a former army lieutenant colonel, has been buying as much shiny military hardware as possible.

Since 2005, he's spent more than $4 billion on foreign weapons, making tiny Venezuela one of the world's most aggressive arms purchasers. In 2006 alone, arms spending were up 13 percent, according to some estimates.

Venezuela is China's closest political ally in South America and has the most extensive military cooperation with the Chinese in Latin America outside of Cuba. It has bought three JYL-1 mobile air defense radars and is looking at also buying fighter jets from China.

In March 2007, Li Changchun, a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, visited senior Venezuelan officials to exchange ideas on the development of bilateral relations with Venezuela. Li met Hugo Chavez, the president of Venezuela, in the Miraflores presidential palace. There he said that since the establishment of the China-Venezuela strategic association, and especially in recent years, relations had entered a new phase characterized by frequent high-level visits, growing political trust and collaboration. This is the first high-level official visit by a Chinese official since Zeng Qinghong, China's vice-president, visited Venezuela in January 2005.

He added that China is certain that cooperation to the benefit of both nations is in the fundamental interest of both nations, and that China seeks to increase strategic consensus with Venezuela.

He also said that the CPC regards exchanges with the Fifth Republic Movement party, founded by Chavez, as very important and called for closer cooperation between the two. Li and Chavez signed economic and technological cooperation.

Venezuela and China created a US$6 billion (euro4.5 billion) fund on March 26, 2007 to boost energy cooperation and finance joint development projects between the two countries. The fund - aimed at increasing Venezuelan oil exports to China from 150,000 to 800,000 barrels a day - was part of a series of agreements signed following a meeting between Chavez and Li Changchun,

"We have brought bilateral relations to a strategic point," Chavez said. "I don't think China has made a decision like this with any other country in half a century. We must thank them for their trust."

Venezuela will invest US$2 billion (euro1.5 billion) in the fund, which will also be used to build railroads, telecommunications networks and shipyards in the South American country, while China will allocate US$4 billion (euro3 billion) for the fund.Under Chavez, Venezuela - one of the world's largest oil exporters - has fostered increasingly close ties with China as it seeks new markets for its petroleum beyond the United States - its top buyer. China is the world's second-largest consumer of oil and third-biggest importer.

Venezuela's state oil company Petroleos de Venezuela SA, or PDVSA, plans to spend US$2.2 billion (euro1.66 billion) to more than triple its fleet of tankers by 2012 to reach remote Asian markets.

Venezuela exports about 15 percent of its crude and other oil products to Asia but seeks to raise that to 45 percent - approximately 1 million barrels a day - within five years. Such a shift would significantly impact US supply.

Venezuela says it produces about 3.3 million barrels a day, but many outside sources - including the International Energy Agency, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, and the U.S. Energy Information Agency - put actual production closer to about 2.5 million barrels a day.

On September 11, 2007 Petróleos de Venezuela, the state-owned oil company agreed that China National Petroleum Corp. will invest more than $10 billion in a heavy-oil venture in Venezuela's Faja del Orinoco region. The venture is intended to produce as much as a million barrels a day in the region, PDVSA said on its Web site Tuesday, citing a statement by Rafael Ramirez, the minister of energy and oil.

President Hugo Chavez has pledged to increase oil exports to China as part of his effort to reduce reliance on the U.S. market and to cement ties with countries with what he says is compatible ideologies.

Iranian Alliances

Iran, either independently or in concert with Russia has also extended their global alliance network. Iran is a supporter of Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Palestine and Syria effectively stretching their influence to the Mediterranean. As also noted, Iran is active in Venezuela and Cuba. Hezbollah cells also operate in the US.

Iran is seeking relations with Turkey. In the Qandil (Kandil) Mountains, where Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria all meet lies the ancestral homeland of the Kurds, known in history as the Medes, who were partners with Persia in defeating Babylon.

Ancient Babylon, celebrated as a fount of law, writing and urban living, sits just outside the modern-day city of Hilla, about 60 miles south of Baghdad. Hilla is neither haunted by Sunni insurgents nor overwhelmed by Shiite militias. And though it has a mix of Shiites and Sunnis, it has not been afflicted by the sectarian violence that has paralyzed so many other heterogeneous parts of Iraq.

You can imagine my interest, therefore, in a front-page story on April 18, 2006 “Babylon Awaits an Iraq Without Fighting” in the New York Times that reported the following: “Babylon, the mud-brick city with the million-dollar name, has paid the price of war. It has been ransacked, looted, torn up, paved over; neglected and roughly occupied….But Iraqi leaders and United Nations officials are not giving up on it. They are working assiduously to restore Babylon, home to one of the Seven Wonders of the World, and turn it into a cultural center and possibly even an Iraqi theme park.”

Over the years, colonial powers took artifacts and Saddam Hussein built on Nebuchadnezzar's palace. Then, the Iraq war. Famous sites, like the Tower of Babel and the Hanging Gardens, are swallowed up by river reeds.

The mayor of the area says, God willing, they will even put up a Holiday Inn.“The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization is pumping millions of dollars into protecting and restoring Babylon and a handful of other ancient ruins in Iraq,” noted correspondent Jeffrey Gettleman. “UNESCO has even printed up a snazzy brochure, with Babylon listed as the premier destination, to hand out to wealthy donors.”

Turkey has been legitimately afraid that in return for Kurdish assistance in deposing Saddam Hussein (it was the Kurds who located Saddam and tipped off US troops) the US would permit at least unofficial attempts to establish a Kurdish homeland on land that Turkey claims. Turkey has maintained up to 20,000 troops on its border with Iraq to prevent such a move.

And in fact the US has been vacillating on the Kurdish issue, even publishing a map of the region showing the presence of a Kurdish entity. US officials later claimed it didn't accurately reflect US policy. Turkey is skeptical.

Iran sees this situation as an opportunity to further strengthen its regional position and has teamed up with Turkey to assist in removing a force of 5000 Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) soldiers from the area where Iran abuts Iraq in the Qandil Mountains. According to several news and intelligence sources they already have positioned troops some 7-8 km inside Iraq and have begun shelling the mountain hideouts. The situation for Turkey offers some big incentives. Not only do they get help in spanking the PUK, but have made it known that they have their eye on Kirkuk, an Iraqi city in the area that produces 40% of Iraq's oil output, and that Turkey had made claim to before.

For its part Iran also sees a chance grab a chunk of Northern Iraq for itself. In addition Iran wants to destroy forward intelligence positions the Israelis may have secretly placed among the Kurds to help them receive the earliest possible warning of an Iranian attack on Israel. Knocking out these posts would give the Iranians two significant victories against the Israelis within the span of just a few months, the war in Lebanon being the other. The loss of this intelligence would no doubt reduce the possibility for a successful US-Israeli attack against Iran, too.

Many observers believe it's already too late to stop the Turkey-Iran initiative. The question is whether it will blossom into yet another Mid-East war pitting the US, Iraq, and Israel against Iran, Turkey, and possibly Syria.

On March 31, 2007, In Overture to Iran, Qaddafi Declares North Africa Shi'ite and Calls for Establishment of New Fatimid State (MEMRI Special Dispatch Series – No 1535 of April 6, 2007). Libyan leader Mu'ammar Qaddafi called, in a speech in Niger to Tuareg tribal leaders, for the establishment of a second Shi'ite Fatimid state in North Africa, after the model of the 10th-13th century empire that ruled North Africa, Egypt, and parts of the Fertile Crescent. In his speech, Qaddafi denounced the division of Muslims into Sunni and Shi'ite as a colonialist plot, and rebuked the Arab League members for "hating Iran."

Military Alliances

Military cooperation is an instrument for containing the US hegemony in the region

Russia

This year, Putin signed a $200 billion, seven-year rearmament plan for Russia's military. The package includes money for the Pacific Fleet, a major Pacific submarine base and new land- and sea-based intercontinental missiles. Last month, Russia resumed global patrols by its long-range strategic bombers, sending two of them far across Pacific Ocean waters to the vicinity of Guam Island, site of a major U.S. base.

These actions are consistent with Russian strategy for opening the Pacific Front and military alliance with Indonesia. It should be noted that this also places Russia and China into potential conflict in the Pacific Basin.

On September 6, 2007, Britain and Norway scrambled jets to trail Russian bombers conducting the new patrols. The Russian Defense Ministry described the flights by eight strategic bombers as a "routine exercise" and said that although the aircraft had encountered planes from NATO countries, there were "no incidents."

Last month, Russia conducted a joint military exercise with China, one of its major arms customers. And it has made or is negotiating other arms deals across Asia, including with India, Malaysia, Burma and Vietnam.

Collective Security Treaty of Organization (CSTO) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)

Some observers remain skeptical that Russia will become a major competitor of the United States and, increasingly, China for influence in the region.

Far from being an isolated phenomenon of bilateral cooperation, the Moscow-Teheran axis in the defense sector results as being part of a wider Euro-Asiatic security network that aims to involve other minor regional states such as Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Armenia, and Byelorussia. These states are united in the Collective Security Treaty of Organization (CSTO), ratified in 1992, and in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), composed of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Russia and China. Iran is not a member of the CSTO but participates as an observer. Relations between Teheran and the CSTO are, however, helped by Beijing’s mediation, former member of the SCO and strategic partners of the CSTO. As can be seen from the complex structure of alliances, Moscow aims to build a security and defense network in the Asian region involving Iran as potential ‘containing’ factor against US influence.

CSTO is a military-political alliance and the SCO is economy-powered. Together, the CSTO and the SCO account for about half the global population and are increasingly keeping up with the U.S. and NATO in terms of leverage in the UN and elsewhere, to the shock and ire of many politicians there. Signatories to the CSTO wouldn't be able to join other military alliances or other groups of states, while an aggression against one signatory would be perceived as an aggression against all.

If on the one hand the Islamic Republic represents a means for the Asiatic states to exert pressure over the Western ones, on the other hand the intense military cooperation is a sign that an eventual attack against the Islamic Republic could easily bring about a wider military conflict.

Venezuela

One of the most eye-popping elements of Chavismo is Venezuela's arms purchases. Flush with oil profits, Chavez, a former army lieutenant colonel, has been buying as much shiny military hardware as possible.

Since 2005, he's spent more than $4 billion on foreign weapons, making tiny Venezuela one of the world's most aggressive arms purchasers. In 2006 alone, arms spending was up 13 percent, according to some estimates.

Some analysts project that if oil prices remain high, say, at more than $50 a barrel, Venezuela could spend as much as $30 billion on arms by 2012, the end of Chavez's third term in office. Caracas is already the largest arms buyer in the region -- and is expected to be so for the foreseeable future.

Russia is Chavez's favorite arms outlet. Having spent more than $3 billion, Caracas is already under contract to buy 24 Su-30 fighters, 50 helicopters/gunships and 100,000 AK103 (AK47 follow-on) assault rifles from Moscow. It has also inked a deal to build the Kalashnikov rifle under Russian license in Venezuela.

Caracas is also interested in Russian air defense systems and diesel submarines, which Moscow would likely be more than happy to provide. In addition to Russia, Venezuela has had preliminary discussions with Belarus and Iran about surface-to-air missile systems.

As few as nine diesel submarines, which could also be provided by Germany or France, would make Venezuela the proud owner of the region's largest submarine fleet, withstanding the U.S., of course. Venezuela has also sought arms from Spain, Sweden and Brazil, which have declined for the moment as a result of U.S. pressure over tech transfer issues. As China develops its advanced weapons industry, it will likely become a source for Venezuela's military.

Energy the Oil Weapon

Indonesia

A series of contractual production-sharing and long-term-supply spats pitting the Indonesian government against multinational energy companies and big natural-gas importers in Japan has recently tarnished Indonesia’s reputation as a reliable business partner. It has also undermined the gas sector’s overall earning potential - crucially at a time when global prices have surged to near-record highs.

Indonesia has some of the largest known pools of natural gas in the world, with total estimated reserves of 187 trillion standard cubic feet (scf), according to the Energy Ministry. Local gas production in 2006 amounted to 8.1 billion scf per day, of which 46% was dedicated to domestic demand for power generation, fertilizer production and other industries, while the rest was exported mainly as liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Significantly, Indonesia’s deep pools remain largely unexploited and rising global energy prices have substantially upped the market incentive to drop new wells. That’s apparently what French oil giant Total SA, currently one of Indonesia’s largest gas exporters, assumed when it announced last week plans to invest US$6 billion over the next five years in its existing operations at the Mahakam Delta oil-and-gas block in remote East Kalimantan province.

Yet no sooner had Total announced its investment plans when Mines and Energy Minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro said the government would likely seek to amend the company’s existing production-sharing contract, including the agreed 70%-30% government-contractor split over revenues, which is to expire in 2017. The minister said the amendments to the contract would seek “what’s best for Indonesia”.

For more than 25 years Indonesia, through Pertamina, dominated the region and led the global LNG market as the world’s largest exporter. But a number of nationalistic policy signals have recently alienated new foreign investors and inhibited the country’s ability to tap new supplies efficiently. Last year, Qatar bypassed Indonesia as the world’s largest LNG exporter.

This year the government has said it will slash LNG exports to traditional major buyers in Japan and South Korea (currently the world’s two largest LNG importers) and also to Taiwan from the contracted 26.4 million tons down to 21.4 million tons. Jakarta has also said it cannot guarantee a contractual extension to supply 12 million tons annually to Japan’s Kansai Electric Power, Chubu Electric, Kyushu Electric, Osaka Gas, Toho Gas and Nippon Steel Corp when the deal runs out in 2011. Tokyo Electric Power Co, Japan’s biggest electric utility, has recently said it will not renew its long-term agreement to purchase LNG from Indonesia when it expires in 2009.

With Indonesia slashing exports to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan according to this article….South Korea is one of the biggest importer of Natural Gas in the world, they have serious implication if the LNG supply is disrupted in anyway.

Japan LNG Supply



LUKoil and the Indonesian state-owned oil company PERTAMINA have signed an agreement to explore some potential fields on the republic's territory, the Russian oil giant's press office reported. The document was signed in Jakarta during Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to the Republic of Indonesia.

The agreement specifies the companies' joint operations for the next two years and involves formation of a steering committee and a joint technical group. The document promotes collaboration between LUKoil and PERTAMINA, which shows great promise and paves the way for a strategic alliance for developing joint projects in oil and gas exploration and production, LUKoil President Vagit Alekperov said.

Be prepared

With the LNG supply for Japan mostly from Islamic countries including Indonesia Japan needs to be concerned about its energy security. China and South Korea also face similar security issues.

Venezuela

Venezuela is the world's eighth-largest oil exporter. In addition, it may have the world's fifth-largest known oil reserves, meaning it has more petroleum potential than any country in the Western Hemisphere. Not a dubious honor, by any means, these days.

Some experts believe the Orinoco Belt, an energy-rich region southeast of Caracas, has as much -- or more -- energy potential than Saudi Arabia, a country known to possess 25 percent of the world's known oil reserves.

Unfortunately, the U.S. likes its Venezuelan heavy crude oil. Venezuela is the United States' fifth-largest foreign oil supplier, providing 10 percent to 15 percent of our oil imports at roughly 1.5 million barrels a day.

The U.S. imports more than 60 percent of its oil, making our economy vulnerable to shocks in the international energy market. Chavez knows this. He once said: "We have invaded the United States, but it's with our oil."

Chavez has vowed to use oil as a weapon, promising to play his "strong oil card" to "finish off the U.S. Empire." On May 1, he got started on his plan by announcing his intention to nationalize Venezuela's oil industry.

Venezuela is now in the process of transitioning from dependence on the long-dominant western energy firms, including some American, to ownership by the state-owned oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA).

Although this move is not promising for American energy security, it is fortunate that Venezuelan oil is of the heavy crude variety. It's highly acidic and difficult to refine. That's good news for the U.S. Why? At the moment, most of the oil refineries capable of processing Venezuelan heavy crude oil happen to be in the U.S., because Caracas has failed to invest sufficiently in petroleum processing capabilities. This may change with China’s commitment to invest in the refinery sector.

Venezuela sends the majority of its petroleum exports, about 60 percent, to the U.S. So, in the short-term, cutting off oil shipments to America would be, at best, a pyrrhic victory for Chavez because he needs access to American refineries -- and so does his Bolivarian revolution.

In the longer term, that situation may change drastically. Caracas may, over time, develop domestic refining capability for its heavy crude oil -- and look elsewhere for eager buyers of its thick, black gold. Indeed, it already is.

Enter China, another of Venezuela's new extra-hemispheric friends. China is now the world's second-largest consumer of energy -- and imported oil, too. And Beijing is eager to find new energy sources.

With no Pacific seaports to transport oil from, it costs about $15 more per barrel to transport oil to China from Venezuela. Despite this, China is now the fastest-growing destination for Venezuelan oil.

Eager to buy oil that might otherwise be bound for the U.S., China is working on significant investments in the Venezuelan energy sector, including developing heavy crude refineries there.
Chavez doesn't just use oil as a foil against enemies like the U.S. He also uses the windfall profits to help friends, including other regional leftist politicians running for election, especially high office. For example, he unabashedly bankrolled successful presidential candidates in Bolivia (Evo Morales), Nicaragua (Daniel Ortega) and Ecuador (Rafael Correa). To Chavez's disappointment, his candidates fell short in Peru and Mexico.

Chavez is using the expropriation of Venezuelan energy assets as a means of consolidating not only his political power at home, but projecting power abroad as well through arms purchases, political campaigns and manipulating oil markets.


But the real question is whether PDVSA, an increasing source of Chavez's revenue -- and thereby his influence -- can actually handle the departure of Western oil firms and their highly skilled technocrats. Early indicators aren't good. It's risky. At the moment, oil typically generates 80 percent of the country's export income, provides more than half of the central government's revenue, and is responsible for about one-third of the country's gross domestic product.

In the end, Hugo Chavez defines himself in opposition to the U.S. His agenda -- a troubling military buildup, connections with countries of concern, political meddling abroad and oil machinations -- is bad news for everybody.

As the director of national intelligence testified to Congress in February: "Chavez is among the most stridently anti-American leaders anywhere in the world, and will continue to try to undercut U.S. influence in Venezuela, in the rest of Latin America and elsewhere internationally."

Chavez clearly plans to challenge the status quo, wielding a multifaceted, asymmetric campaign akin to a political, economic, security and social insurgency in Latin America and the Caribbean at the expense of the United States' influence and interests.

It's tempting to write off Chavez simply as Latin America's latest tin-pot strongman, but he shouldn't be taken lightly. Venezuela's Chavismo has the potential to cause real trouble for the U.S. and Latin American democracies.

Control of Transportation Routes

China and Potentially Russia and Islamists Seek to Build a Sea-lane Denial Capability
The threat to China is the U.S. Navy. If the United States wanted to break China, its means of doing so would be naval interdiction. This would not have to be a close-in interdiction. The Chinese import oil from around the world and ship their goods around the world. U.S. forces could choose to stand off, far out of the range of Chinese missiles -- or reconnaissance platforms that would locate U.S. ships -- and interdict the flow of supplies there, at a chokepoint such as the Strait of Malacca. Over 50% of the world’s cargo passes through these straits. This strategy would have far-reaching implications, of course: the Malacca Strait is essential not only to China, but also to the United States and the rest of the world. But the point is that the U.S. Navy could interdict China’s movement of goods far more readily than China could interdict American movement of goods.

For China, freedom of the seas has become a fundamental national interest. Right now, China’s access to the sea-lanes depends on U.S. acquiescence. The United States has shown no interest whatsoever in cutting off that access -- quite the contrary. But China, like any great power, does not want its national security held hostage to the goodwill of another power -- particularly not one it regards as unpredictable and as having interests quite different from its own. The issue is increased Chinese nationalism, which we discuss later.

To put it simply, the United States currently dominates the world’s oceans. This is a source of enormous power, and the United States will not give up that domination voluntarily. China, for its part, cannot live with that state of affairs indefinitely. China may not be able to control the sea itself, but it cannot live forever with U.S. control. Therefore, China requires building a sea-lane-denial strategy.

It is important to recognize that the Islamists, Russia or China controls all oil transit choke points. Over 40 million barrels per day of oil moves by tanker, in many cases though World Oil Transit Chokepoints. Bab el-Mandab-- Djibouti/Eritrea/Yemen; connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. 3 million-bbl/d flows through this choke point. Suez/Sumed-- Egypt; connects the Red Sea and Gulf of Suez with the Mediterranean Sea. Oil Flows (2004E): 3.8 million bbl/d northbound, and 0.4 million bbl/d southbound. Northbound shipments consisted of 2.5 million bbl/d of crude oil via the Sumed Pipeline (nearly all of which came from Saudi Arabia), 0.8 million bbl/d of crude oil via the Suez Canal, and 0.5 million bbl/d of petroleum products via the Suez Canal. Southbound oil flows through the Suez Canal totaled 0.3 million bbl/d of petroleum products, and 0.1 million bbl/d of crude oil.

The Strait of Malacca, linking the Indian and Pacific Oceans, is the shortest sea route between the Persian Gulf and Asian markets, including three of the world's most populous countries -- India, China, and Indonesia -- and therefore is considered to be the key choke point in Asia. The narrowest point of this shipping lane is the Phillips Channel in the Singapore Strait, which is only 1.5 miles wide at its narrowest point. This creates a natural bottleneck, with the potential for a collision, grounding, or oil spill (in addition, piracy is a regular occurrence in the Singapore Strait). If the strait were closed, nearly half of the world's fleet would be required to sail further, generating a substantial increase in the requirement for vessel capacity. All excess capacity of the world fleet might be absorbed, with the effect strongest for crude oil shipments and dry bulk such as coal. Closure of the Strait of Malacca would immediately raise freight rates worldwide. More than 50,000 vessels per year transit the Strait of Malacca. With Chinese oil imports from the Middle East increasing steadily, the Strait of Malacca is likely to grow in strategic importance in coming years.

Crashing into the middle of this APEC meeting came Vladimir Putin, a bear at a picnic, a witch at the christening. The Russian came to Sydney from Jakarta. There, he formalized a deal to sell Indonesia submarines, tanks and aircraft worth more than a billion dollars.

The deal would give Indonesia a big strategic step-up. And it moves Indonesia away from the West and closer to the Russian sphere of influence. Japan immediately asked for an explanation.
"Any country that makes such a big deal should explain why it's important for their security and how they assess the security situation around their country," the spokesman for Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mitsuo Sakaba, said in Sydney. "They should explain their intentions."

Under questioning at a press conference in Sydney yesterday, Mr. Putin defended the sale: "These are legal and open transactions and they lead to no negative consequences in the world; they do not somehow disturb any balance."

Australian experts disagree. Dr. Alexey Muraviev, a strategic affairs analyst at the Curtin University of Technology, said that despite the public assurances by Mr. Putin and the Australian Government about the specter of a regional arms race, and despite the submarines the Russians will sell Indonesia not being quite as good as Australia's Collins Class subs, the subs presented "a security challenge to the Royal Australian Navy".

"It may certainly be a challenge to our anti-submarine warfare capabilities." Dr. Muraviev says.
"Well, we now have a region where China, India, Pakistan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and now Indonesia are modernizing their submarine forces. So much for politicians with short-term vision."

Indonesia's naval capability is a first-order strategic concern because the Indonesian archipelago itself is a first-order strategic concern.

The country sits astride one of the world's vital strategic shipping routes, the Strait of Malacca. A quarter of all global oil shipments pass through the strait, including most of the oil needed to fuel the Japanese and South Korean economies. About 40 per cent of Australia's exports pass through the strait. And further, Indonesia is a major suppler LNG for Japan, China and South Korea. A submarine fleet, whether it is from Russia, Indonesia or China presents a major issue in the Pacific.

Like the Suez and the Panama canals, the Malacca Strait is one of the world's primary strategic choke-points.

The Russian deal with Indonesia descended on the APEC summit table like a slammed fist.
It reminds us that the Asia-Pacific is a region seething with rivalries. Thrusting great powers are competing for influence. Dozens of conflicting territorial claims remain unresolved. A competition for resources is accelerating. An arms race is afoot. Worse, a nuclear arms race is under way in the region. And the Asia-Pacific, unlike Europe, has no mechanism for dealing with these tensions.

While Europe has developed a system for sharing sovereignty and avoiding armed conflict, the basic impulse of the Asia-Pacific states is unchanged from the slogan that summarized Japan's national aims in the Meiji era 150-odd years ago: "Rich country, strong army."

Suddenly, the "new security agenda" dominating APEC, while still important, looks decidedly thin. The old security agenda is stridently and aggressively alive.

China is a rising great power, with a booming economy and a vast thirst for resources. It has territorial disputes with Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand, among others, all with overlapping claims on the oil-rich seabed of the South China Sea.

These disputes are dormant but unresolved. The South China Sea was the scene of 13 resource-related military clashes in the 1990s, nine of which involved China.

Beijing has since adopted a more conciliatory posture, but in the meantime it is investing in a big defense build-up.

Maintain Control of Russia

To maintain the Putin legacy, he must control the continuation of his policy. Putin took the first steps on September 12, 2007 when he dismissed his entire cabinet. He nominated a relative unknown to the speaker of State Duma - Victor Zubkov, head of the country's money-laundering watchdog agency.

Since 2001, Victor Zubkov has been the head of Russia's Federal Financial Monitoring Service in 2001, a body dedicated to rooting out money-laundering operations. It was through this organization that Putin gained control of energy and natural resources of Russia.

As such, he has been one of Mr. Putin's key allies in the battle to control Russia's oligarchs, the powerful magnates who had made their fortunes during the market free-for-all which typified the era of Boris Yeltsin.

The two men first worked together in the city administration of the president's native city, St Petersburg, in the 1990s.

From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Zubkov was deputy chairman of St Petersburg's committee on external relations, while Mr. Putin was chairman.

David J. Jonsson is the author of Clash of Ideologies —The Making of the Christian and Islamic Worlds, Xulon Press 2005. His new book: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance (Salem Communications (May 30, 2006). He received his undergraduate and graduate degrees in physics. He worked for major corporations in the United States and Japan and with multilateral agencies that brought him to more that fifteen countries with significant or majority populations who are Muslim. These exposures provided insight into the basic tenants of Islam as a political, economic and religious system. He became proficient in Islamic law (Shariah) through contract negotiation and personal encounter. David can be reached at: djonsson2000@yahoo.co.uk

Labels:

Thursday, August 09, 2007

Role of Sovereign Wealth Funds Controlled by the Authoritarian Great Powers - David Jonsson

by David J. Jonsson

Liberal democracy, led by the United States may have emerged triumphant from the struggles of the 20th century. But the rise of the non-democratic powers of Russia, China and the Islamist states utilizing the combined power of control of energy resources and the growth of Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWF) leaves the liberal democracy’s ultimate victory and future dominance in doubt. Overseas investments by Sovereign Wealth Funds have always had the potential to cause alarm in the destination countries. Because they are driven by governments of the totalitarian and Authoritarian Great Powers, they compel countries to take immediate attention

How powerful Sovereign Wealth Funds decide to invest their vast armory of cash will play a pivotal role in reshaping financial markets in the next decade. These funds are going to have the ability to buy any global company, to create panic in markets if they move too precipitously, even to dwarf the political clout of international financial institutions. They can no longer be ignored.

The Sovereign Wealth Funds are potentially a powerful tool of asymmetric warfare like none we have witnessed before.

The Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance is using its propaganda machine to convince us that Investment funds run by authoritarian governments sound scary. They are not. So trumpets The Economist print edition of July 26, 2007.

GO FOR a walk in Chelsea, an expensive bit of London, and you may stroll by the Coldstream Guards' barracks, now the property of the government of Qatar; a branch of the venerable Barclays bank, soon to be part-owned by the People's Republic of China; and then buy a picnic at Sainsbury's, Britain's oldest supermarket, which the Anglophile Qataris are trying to buy too. What goes for Chelsea may soon be true for neighbourhoods in open economies all over the world: governments are on a shopping spree. (see Governments go shopping)

In considering the role of Sovereign Wealth Funds it is imperative to consider the difference between state vs. private ownership. However, in some cases the difference is blurred because in some cases the state influence, political motives and ideology override the fund ownership as in the case of funds from Islamist countries.

In much of Europe and emerging markets, it took decades for many economies to be free from the controls of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Are we now seeing the return of state ownership in the infrastructures and large industries, not by the local governments, but by foreign states?

In any case, there should be more discussions and studies on whether SWFs are really returning our Western economies to the former days of state-owned enterprises, but to an even worse case that of foreign state owned entities.

Beware, Wakeup, a foreign state entity – be it either from an Authoritarian Islamist state or Russia or China – they may be the new owner of your newspaper, radio station, electric utility, and even your most sensitive supplier of war material. The rapid growth of Sovereign Wealth Funds poses risks beyond that of national security. There are worries over competence within some funds; concerns that their scale and ability to affect asset prices could lead to market volatility; and suspicion that they could help countries preserve a favorable currency regime. If decisions are swayed by political considerations, they could also undermine market discipline that matches rewards to sound corporate governance. The ownership may also have a devastating impact on employment practices and human rights. Big and powerful they are coming to company near you or one you work for.

The Tempting Foreign Investment

In the short term, seeking foreign investment was all too tempting. The savings of Asian and oil-exporting countries have helped fuel the current boom. Their purchases of western government bonds have funded the external deficits created by profligate consumers and lowered real interest rates, boosting asset prices. Countries such as the UK and US haven’t worried about running huge trade deficits, funded in the main by the willingness of countries producing oil and other resources to run big surpluses. We didn’t mind when they recycled those dollars and pounds by putting cash on deposit in our banks, or buying bonds issued by our governments. We should have and we need to change our ways.

But the long-term consequences of the bargain are now clearer. Non-US official entities now hold 30 per cent of all Treasuries and they are, quite rationally, keen to diversify. Sovereign reserves stand at $5,500bn - or 29 per cent of US market capitalization. Governments are moving from lending to the west to owning chunks of it.

The Challenge

The challenge is here to stay. Asian and oil exporting countries cannot be expected to buy Treasuries forever. And many western economies rely on capital inflows. Protectionism is not the solution but neither is widespread direct control of companies by governments, with the resulting potential for capital misallocation and inefficiency. By working to insert market imperatives between governments and their investments, these two outcomes can be avoided.

With oil prices spiking in recent years, the petrostates' windfall is staggering. This sort of wealth should be a godsend for impoverished, post-Soviet countries. However, such positive impact is by no means certain in unaccountable governing systems where a small group of elites tend to control a large part of the resources. Other than Norway, which enjoyed the advantage of having accountable institutions in place when it came into its energy wealth, the track record of countries rich in energy resources is quite poor.

With so much money flowing into these countries the stakes are raised for powerful elites who dominate these systems and control these formidable resources. To protect their lucrative positions they seek to limit scrutiny of their activities by silencing the press, political opposition, civil society and other independent institutions.

The Growth of SWFs has been Accompanied by Restrictions on the Free Press

Russia has seen the most precipitous press freedom decline in recent years. Today, all of the major national television channels (Channel One, RTR, and NTV), from which most Russians get their news and information, have come under state control and are effectively censored. Control of national television news broadcasting is, however, only one piece of a broad and comprehensive campaign to bring independent media under the sway of the authorities. The energy industry has had a significant hand in the pacification of independent news media. Gazprom-Media, an arm of the state-controlled gas behemoth, has acquired control of a number of previously independent news outlets and either closed their doors or drained them of independent reporting. In July 2006, President Putin signed a law that expanded the definition of extremist activity to include public slander of a government official related to his or her duties, using or threatening violence against a government official or his family, and publicly justifying or excusing terrorism. The definition of extremism in this new law is so broad that it allows the authorities to use unchecked power against their critics, including in the media.

The Kremlin, meanwhile, having already effectively constrained independent organizations and voices at home is now pursuing an international dimension to its anti­democratic campaign. Russia's leadership has apparently set its sights on limiting the ability of important international organizations to scrutinize its conduct.

The Impact of SWFs will Play Out Over Time

“The full impact on financial markets will manifest itself over multiple years,” says Ramin Toloui, emerging markets portfolio manager at Pimco, one of the world’s largest fixed-income managers.

But the current wave, driven by an oil boom that has seen oil prices peak at $78, has been on a different scale. While some petrodollars have been invested at home, the Gulf cannot absorb most of them. So, after an initial hesitation following the 9/11 attacks, Arab investors are eyeing foreign assets, especially in the UK and, increasingly, in Asia.

Before this petrodollar boom, only one Arab billionaire investor's name sprung easily to mind in the west: that of Prince Alwaleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia, who invested in Citigroup, News Corp, AOL-Time Warner and Euro Disney.

Governments are Different the Private Investors

Governments are very different from other economic actors. Their investments should be governed by rules designed with that reality very clearly in mind.

Radical Islam finds liberal democracy repugnant, and the movement is often described as the new fascist threat; however Radical Islam, in many cases utilizing some democratic principles has made progress in establishing Islamist – Political Islam in a number of previously secular nations. In some cases, the Islamist parties have utilized the promotion of capitalism, as in the case of Turkey and other Middle Eastern countries to gain credibility. It is the potential use of weapons of mass destruction – by state and transnational actors, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, al-Qaeda etc. that makes militant Islam a menace. However, potentially even more threatening to the West is growth of Sovereign Wealth Funds within Islamist countries resulting from oil revenues which pose the threat.

In previous articles and my book Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance I develop the role of Islamic Economics as a tool for world domination.

The second, and equally significant, challenge emanates from the rise of non-democratic great powers: the West's old Cold War rivals China and Russia, now operating under authoritarian capitalist, rather than communist, regimes. Authoritarian capitalist great powers played a leading role in the international system up until 1945. They have been absent since then. But today, they seem poised for a comeback. Reference: The Return of Authoritarian Great Powers by Azar Gat from Foreign Affairs, July/August 2007.

“While the Iraq crisis continues, the strategy of the Grand Chess Masters”: “Russia the bear and China the dragon along with their pawns the Leftists, Marxists and Islamists continue to develop and put in place their strategy for the ultimate goal of world domination.”
In prior articles we discussed the fact that in reality there has been arisen a cabal of which brings together the authoritarian powers of the Islamist States with China and Russia. As I discussed in the article, The Global Strategy of the Russian-Iran Cabal the tough questions that must be answered if the allies joined for freedom and liberty will support a battle against the forces of evil. These are:
Who is the enemy?
What are their goals?
What is the definition of success, and finally
What will the world be like if we lose?
Decades from now, historians will discover that the United States, the West and the international community were being targeted by global ideological movements which emerged in the 1920s, survived World War II and the Cold War, and carefully choose this timing for its onslaught against liberal democracy.

The utilization of Sovereign Wealth Funds for control is common to the Islamist countries and the West's old Cold War rivals China and Russia, now operating under authoritarian capitalist, rather than communist, regimes. See my Op-Ed: Nationalization – A Plan for World Domination.
Strategic Implications of Sovereign Wealth Funds

Attempts by foreign interests to buy large companies at the forefront of a nation's commercial life often arouse strong protectionist feelings. When the buyer is an overseas government, the resistance may be stronger - especially if the target has strategic significance.

So it is no surprise that the arrival in the US and Europe of state-backed foreign investors with enormous amounts to spend on corporate acquisitions has caused a frisson among politicians and business interests. Countries such as China and Russia, with fast-growing foreign exchange reserves, are following the lead of those where savings stem from extracting oil and other commodities in creating Sovereign Wealth Funds to invest in advanced economies.

As a result of a shifting pattern of demand away from relatively safe assets such as bonds, Morgan Stanley estimates that bond yields will gradually rise by 30-40 basis points during the next 10 years. The equity risk premium – the excess return over the risk-free rate that compensates investors for taking on the higher risk of equities – could fall by 80-110 basis points.

Nicholas Brooks, senior economist at Henderson Global Investors, says of China’s plans to create a State Investment Corporation that, if a primary goal of its asset allocators is to reduce the share of US Treasury bond holdings, yields on those should rise. If the SIC were to invest along the lines of Singapore’s GIC (assuming bond allocation is 25 per cent and 60 per cent of this is in US bonds) and reserves rose at the same pace as in 2006, net new annual buying of government debt would drop from $89bn to about $56bn, he says.

In the absence of any big change in US government net debt issuance, this would imply around a half-point increase in the yields on US 10-year Treasury bonds. But Mr. Brooks adds: “It is not in China’s economic, financial or political interests to roil US debt markets or antagonize its smaller neighbors by creating undue upward pressure on their exchange rates and equity markets . . . [so] asset allocation changes will be gradual and timed to minimize their impact on markets.”

In addition to China’s State Investment Corporation; Beijing raised the limits for overseas investment by Chinese insurance companies, potentially making up to $50bn (£24bn) available. Chinese insurers have a combined Rmb2,500bn (£161bn) in assets and the total is growing at 25 to 30 per cent a year.

The loosening of China's capital controls forms a route for Chinese money to enter global markets, as the country moves from being a huge net importer of capital to a net exporter.
Chinese commercial banks, fund managers and securities companies are already allowed to invest in global bonds and equities. They are expected to invest at least $50bn in international capital markets during the next two years, JPMorgan estimates.

Jing Ulrich, chairman of Chinese equities at JPMorgan, calculates that by 2020 capital outflows from China may top $1,500bn at current growth rates in savings, provided that the country's capital account is fully open by then.

In my Op-Ed of April 3, 2006 Structural Changes – Destruction Of The U.S. Dollar from the Global Politician I commented:

“No longer satisfied with the income from lending their cash to the US and other governments by buying bonds, these funds want to acquire assets that offer better returns. Their actions are stirring up concerns in the countries they target and the feared motivations of some of the sovereign investors are prompting calls for measures to block foreign takeovers of strategic assets.”

“There is a distinct risk that foreign funds turning from creditors to owners will trigger reactions from the recipient countries that will undermine globalization,” says Stephen Jen, a currency analyst at Morgan Stanley.

The SWFs are notoriously difficult to keep track of since they are blended with the massive pool of private capital. SWFs in general, they ascertain, rank below even the most secretive hedge funds in terms of disclosure of fund performance, investment strategy or even basic philosophy.
Another reason why SWFs are so notoriously difficult to keep track of is because they often channel their investment through discreet secondary managers. This is done to avert nationalist backlashes when purchasing foreign companies seen locally as having strategic importance. There are serious doubts whether these funds are operating on a purely commercial basis or to fulfill broader goals of national governments.

Implications of Shariah-Compliant Sovereign Wealth Funds

Islamic Finance is core and kernel to the Islamic ‘Way of Life’. It is also central to the teaching s of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is fundamental to establishment of the ‘Islamic kingdom of God on Earth’.

Islamic country based SWFs will be operated on the basis of compliance with Shariah Law (Islamic Law) and will be “Shariah-Compliant.” Shariah governance requires the development of Islamic finance to be orderly and compliant with the Islamic Injunctions.

It is impossible to exaggerate the dangers inherent in Shariah-Compliant SWFs. On the face of it, we are dealing merely with "interest free" financial instruments. For the investment funds, there is a requirement that they have a Shariah Board which is involved with all aspects of a proposed transaction so that it would issue a formal fatwa endorsing it as fully Shariah compliant. The expansion of Shariah-Compliant SWFs will require ultimately the change of Securities Laws to consistent with Shariah law. Efforts are underway in the US and the UK to implement the changes.

Shariah compliance limits the type of companies and lending practices of the companies. Large Shariah compliant funds will have an affect on equities. This fact by their vary nature would indicate that the funds are operated to fulfill the broader goals of the national governments and incremental Islamization of the host countries. Islamic ownership may in the future further impose restrictions on activities of the companies not consistent with Islamic principles. Clearly, such boards are not only bound to raise the cost of the international finance (some members get as much as $500,000 for their participation) but also are open to obfuscation and corruption.

Even more importantly, such boards are sure to increase the power of the most orthodox Imams who alone have the standing to issue a fatwa accepted by all Muslims. Just consider the additional future vulnerability of countries which would find themselves in Islamist cross hairs in the manner Denmark has. There is little doubt that Imams sitting on Shariah boards would be pressured to withhold their approval of any instrument directly or indirectly connected with the "offending" country or institution. The term self-censorship is bound to acquire a new meaning.

While Western elites focus on the problems of immigration and assimilation, they ignore the threat Islamic banking is posing to the global economic system. Indeed, we are facing the emergence of a new financial Berlin wall or a Shariah-Compliant global financial system.

Government Reactions to Sovereign Wealth Funds

UK reaction to Qatar Investment Authority, which controls $40bn of funds, already owns 25 per cent of Sainsbury and has mooted a bid for the rest. J. Sainsbury, the supermarket chain that supplies groceries to Britain's middle classes.

There are signs of deepening concerns elsewhere in Europe, where politicians and business leaders are already more resistant than the British to foreign acquisitions. Angela Merkel, German chancellor, said this month that Berlin was considering legislation to make it harder for Sovereign Wealth Funds to take over German companies.

The European Commission has launched an inquiry into whether vast state-controlled investment funds from Russia, China and the Middle East threaten the continent's single market.

Even Charlie McCreevy, EU internal market commissioner, a leading champion of free markets, is concerned about sovereign funds.

His spokesman said they were “a new phenomenon” and the commissioner would “look at this very carefully in the autumn”. Officials had already started work on the issue.

“The internal market rules are based on rules of investment,” Mr. McCreevy's spokes-man said. “Things are different if people are paying above the market price and are trying to buy certain assets for different reasons, other than making a good return on their investment.”

Angela Merkel, German chancellor, and Nicolas Sarkozy, president of France, believe so-called sovereign funds sometimes buy European companies for political and other reasons.

Germany is attracted by the US approach of vetting potential acquisitions and blocking them in sensitive industries. However, an alternative approach was outlined last week by Peter Mandelson, European Union trade commissioner, who said a vetting process would deter legitimate investors. He suggested instead that the EU could allow governments to use “golden shares” to stop foreign state-controlled funds buying sensitive companies that the buying country protected domestically.

Brussels has opposed golden shares in the past and forced European governments to scrap them other than for sensitive industries such as defense. Mr. Mandelson said any system should be regulated at a pan-European level to avoid distorting the single market. “You cannot leave it simply in the hands of a member state that is pursuing its own national interests,” he said. “These shares must reflect the European interest, not the national one.” But by adding that it would be wrong to exclude Sovereign Wealth Funds altogether, he strengthened the impression among some observers that the real target for European concerns is Russia.

France and Germany, for example, seemed happy to allow Dubai's ruling family to buy its stake in EADS maker of Airbuses and Eurofighters this month. The fund will not be seeking board representation. Not that it would be able to get it. Appointing EADS directors is a privilege reserved for the members of the shareholder pact that controls 58 per cent of the shares. Rather, as with Dubai International Capital (DIC's) recent purchase of HSBC stock, the strategy is to take long-term stakes in the world's largest companies. The acquisition of shares of HSBC makes it “one of the leading shareholders” in HSBC, Europe's biggest bank. DIC is the private-equity arm of conglomerate Dubai Holding, founded by Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, who is prime minister and vice president of the United Arab Emirates and ruler of Dubai.

Political considerations cannot be ruled out though. The 5 per cent stake in EADS held by Russian bank VTB looks to be aimed partly at winning sub-assembly work for Russia. There are signs that Qatar and China may also seek a closer relationship too. For Dubai, the inside track on EADS-owned Airbus wouldn't hurt. Airbus is the main supplier of aircraft to the Emirates airline and Dubai is hoping to expand its position as a major aircraft maintenance hub.

Libyan Connection

On August 3, 2007 Gadaffi seals EU missiles deal, just as Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, on Friday yielded to calls for an inquiry into France’s deepening ties with Libya, amid concerns over recent nuclear and weapons deals with Tripoli.

It came just hours after the announcement of a European anti-tank missile deal with Libya. This had prompted opposition demands for a probe into links with the government of Muammer Gadaffi, following unease about France’s role in persuading Tripoli to release six imprisoned Bulgarians last month.

On Friday, it was announced MBDA Missile Systems had finalized a contract to supply Tripoli with an unspecified number of Milan anti-tank missiles. MBDA is 37.5 per cent owned by EADS, the European aerospace and defense group, which is partly owned by the French state. BAE Systems, the British defense supplier, has another 37.5 per cent and Italy’s Finmeccanica owns the rest.

The missile deal, which still needs to be formally signed, was on Friday confirmed in a statement by EADS, which said the agreement had been under negotiation for more than 18 months.

EADS said it was in the course of finalizing a deal to sell Libya a consignment of Tetra radios, a secure communication system made solely by EADS.

It is important to review some recent events regarding Libyan leader Mu'ammar Qaddafi as discussed in my Op-Ed of April 21 in The New Media Journal, The Followers of Ismail

“In recent weeks we have seen resurgence in the followers of the Ismaili sect of Shia Islam. Libyan leader Mu'ammar Qaddafi called, in a speech in Niger to Tuareg tribal leaders, for the establishment of a second Shi'ite Fatimid state in North Africa, after the model of the 10th-13th century empire that ruled North Africa, Egypt, and parts of the Fertile Crescent.”

“On March 30, 2007, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi said that it was a mistake to believe that Christianity was a universal faith alongside Islam according to the Reuters correspondent Salah Sarrar writing from AGADEZ, Niger. See: Gaddafi says only Islam a universal religion.”

Quoting Gaddafi:” There are serious mistakes -- among them the one saying that Jesus came as a messenger for other people other than the sons of Israel,” he told a mass prayer meeting in Niger.”

“Christianity is not a faith for people in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas. Other people who are not sons of Israel have nothing to do with that religion,” he said at the prayer meeting, held to mark the birth of the prophet Mohammed.

Gaddafi, who is seeking to expand his influence in Africa, said his arguments came from the Qur’an. He led similar prayers last year in Mali.

“On March 31, 2007, Libyan leader Mu'ammar Qaddafi called, in a speech in Niger to Tuareg tribal leaders, for the establishment of a second Shi'ite Fatimid state in North Africa, after the model of the 10th-13th century empire that ruled North Africa, Egypt, and parts of the Fertile Crescent. In his speech, Qaddafi denounced the division of Muslims into Sunni and Shi'ite as a colonialist plot, and rebuked the Arab League members for “hating Iran” according to the article In Overture to Iran, Qaddafi Declares North Africa Shi'ite and Calls for Establishment of New Fatimid State by MEMRI Special Dispatch Series – No 1535 of April 6, 2007.”

The Russian Connection

But with Russian companies such as Gazprom saying they are interested in acquiring energy assets in the EU, there are fears that strategic sectors could fall under Moscow's control - particularly in the eastern and central European countries that have just broken free from its grip. Gazprom, a Russian conglomerate in effect controlled by the Kremlin, has strategic interests in the energy sectors of a number of countries and even a stake in Airbus. The energy stakes are particularly high for Europe. EU imports of Russian energy are expected to grow from 50 percent to 70 percent over the next decade and a half.

The US Looks at the Impact of SWFs

In the US, a senior Treasury official has also warned that the growth in sovereign Wealth Funds could create new risks for the international financial system. Clay Lowery, acting under-secretary for international affairs, said little was known about their investment policies, which meant minor comments or rumors would tend to increase volatility in capital markets.

He warned that the funds were rarely subject to market disciplines, being controlled by public servants imperfectly accountable to the citizens for whom they were investing. There were also dangers for those who dealt with them if they assumed that the funds were underwritten by the state that owns them. “With so much money invested across a wider range of asset classes, Sovereign Wealth Funds will need to have strong fiduciary controls and good checks and balances to prevent corruption.”

The SEC looking at sovereign wealth funds. According to MarketWatch—the Chairman questions funds' motives during Senate hearing on July 31. SEC Chairman Christopher Cox told a Senate Banking Committee hearing that these funds, which are government investment vehicles funded by foreign-exchange assets, pose challenges to the U.S. regulatory system.

Sovereign Wealth Funds are “significantly less transparent” than hedge funds, Cox noted.
The SEC chief said the growing governmental and potentially political influence over capital market flows that the Sovereign Wealth Funds portend “presents challenges to a regulatory system premised on free markets, the free flow of information and investor incentives based on profit and loss.”

During a question-and-answer session with senators, Cox said motives for investment decisions may “go beyond profit and loss.”

The value of the funds could reach $12 trillion by 2015, up from $2.5 trillion now and dwarfing hedge funds' value. And by 2022, their assets will reach $27.2 trillion, according to recent estimates by Morgan Stanley.

Their size will then be twice the official central bank reserves and their share of worldwide financial assets will have grown from the current 2.5 per cent to nearly 10 per cent. It is likely that this shift in SWFs towards equities will lead to higher P/E ratios, lower bond prices and rising interest rates. If oil prices should fall, the share of Asian surpluses and SWF assets is expected to increase, while a rise in oil prices will lead to rising assets of the SWFs of oil exporters and would set off concomitant declines of the SWFs of Asian manufacturers.

The bottom line is that the importance of SWFs in world finance is about to rise significantly in any case. See: West’s growing fear of state funds by Dr Eckart Woertz. He is Program Manager, Economics, at the Gulf Research Centre in Dubai writing in The Peninsula.

The International Monetary Fund is working on the issues raised by the growth of Sovereign Wealth Funds, which will be on the agenda of the IMF's annual meeting in October. Simon Johnson, chief economist, expressed concern last month that financial flows were going increasingly through “black boxes” and could pose risks to global stability.

The Funds

A specter is haunting international financial markets – the specter of Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) buying up Western assets, putting them at the disposal of potentially “unfriendly” regimes and seriously pushing markets out of balance by changes in their asset allocation towards equities and other higher risk instruments. These developments will affect the foreign investment decisions of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) investors in a major way. The SWFs are not owned by private individuals and institutions, but by governments of countries that command substantial current account surpluses, i.e. industrializing countries in Asia and oil exporters. Hardly known only a few years ago, they now dwarf the glamorous world of hedge funds and other private institutional investors. Everybody knows George Soros or Warren Buffet, but when it comes to assets under management they are just poor cousins in comparison to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), Singapore’s Temasek or the official reserves of China and Russia, which are currently being moved away from conservative central bank management to the auspices of newly generated SWFs. (See: West’s growing fear of state funds)
As Lawrence Summers comments in the Financial Times article of July 30, Sovereign funds shake the logic of capitalism, “For some time now, the large flow of capital from the developing to the industrialized world has been the principal irony of the international financial system. In 2007 this flow will total well over half a trillion dollars, a figure that will be comfortably exceeded by the build-up in reserves and Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) in developing countries.

As Summers comments, Apart from the question of what foreign stakes would mean for companies, there is the additional question of what they might mean for host governments. What about the day when a country joins some “coalition of the willing” and asks the US president to support a tax break for a company in which it has invested? Or when a decision has to be made about whether to bail out a company, much of whose debt is held by an ally's central bank?

The Norwegian Government Pension Fund

The Norwegian Government Pension Fund - which has invested much of the country's North Sea oil riches and is now worth more than $300bn - is widely acknowledged to offer a model of good governance and accountability.

The biggest equity owner in Europe, it lists all 3,500 investments on its website and is an activist investor, voting on all resolutions - against poison pill protection from takeovers and for pay linked to future performance. Its stakes are typically small in each company so, far from feeling threatened by its investments, companies often welcome it to their share registers.

The Gulf Cooperation Council

Collectively, the Gulf Co-operation Council countries, which include Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, control foreign assets worth $1.6 trillion, 225% of their gross domestic product, according to the Institute of International Finance. See: Tracking the assets that make the Gulf an economic powerhouse.

Sovereign Wealth Funds themselves have been around for decades. The Kuwait Investment Authority, created in 1960 to invest the emirate's oil revenues, has accumulated more than $100bn (£49bn, €73bn) of assets, including a recent 3.1 per cent stake in EADS, the aerospace group.

Kuwait acquired a stake of more than 20 per cent in BP in 1988, the British government forced it to reduce the holding to 9.9 per cent amid concerns over the influence of an oil producer on one of the world's largest oil companies.

The largest sovereign fund is thought to be the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, which ING, the Dutch banking group, estimates has as much as $500bn under management.

In the US, Dubai Ports World, owned by the Gulf emirate, was forced to sell five port terminals it acquired when it bought P&O in 2006. Congressional opposition to allowing an Arab country to acquire the facilities led Dubai's ruler to decide on disposal to a US entity after the takeover. See also my Op-Ed: Dubai Ports – Strategic Implications.

Inchcape Shipping Services is the world’s leading marine services provider. Through their proprietary network of over 200 offices worldwide, we provide our customers with a truly world-class service - delivered locally and individually tailored to each customer’s needs. Their diverse customer base includes clients across the oil, cruise, navy and defense, offshore, container and bulk commodity sectors.

While the ports deal was being scrutinized in the press and in Congressional hearings, the ink was drying on another sale that, according to one insider, poses as great a risk to U.S. security.

In January 2006, Emirates-based Istithmar purchased U.K.-based Inchcape Shipping Services, or ISS, a company that specializes in “ship husbanding” in more than 200 ports worldwide. Ship husbanding includes providing supplies, crew transportation and some security to vessels making port calls. As a side note, on August 8, 2007 Jones Apparel Group and Istithmar have inked a new $942.3 million cash deal for the Dubai-based firm’s purchase of Barneys New York.

Al Qaeda operatives passed themselves off as boats crews assisting with ship husbanding (also known as “ship agents”) to pull off the 2000 bombing of the U.S. Navy destroyer Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden, killing 17 sailors. With this sale, the issue now is whether an Arab-run firm will continue with a British company's approach to security and manpower.

Qatar joins forces with Dubai to invest $1bn, two of the Gulf's most aggressive investors, have teamed up to create a new vehicle looking at international and regional investment opportunities. . It signals growing co-operation between the gas-rich emirate of Qatar and Dubai, the region's commercial hub. Both are ploughing billions of dollars into western companies, while also snapping up expensive London property.

However, reaction to a bid to take full control of a leading UK company could be tested by the proposed Qatari offer for J. Sainsbury, the supermarket chain that supplies groceries to Britain's middle classes. Delta Two, an arm of the Qatar Investment Authority, which controls $40bn of funds, already owns 25 per cent of Sainsbury and has mooted a bid for the rest.

The emergence of Gulf funds with significant stakes in HSBC and J Sainsbury this year has thrust the region's investors onto the British high street for the first time.

Now, Saudi Arabia's Maan al-Sanea owns 3.1 per cent of HSBC, the Dubai ruler's Dubai International Capital also owns a large stake in the bank.

Married into an established Saudi family, he has built up a diversified conglomerate to become one of Saudi's biggest “hammours”, the Gulf's popular fish that has given its name to the Saudi super-rich that dominate the stock market.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority has used the oil revenues of the past three decades to build up quietly a portfolio of international equities, debt and money markets that is said to reach $250bn-$500bn.

Another body, the Abu Dhabi Investment Council, is set to start up next month, to keep ADIA on its toes and focus on investing in the Middle East. Other leading investors from Saudi Arabia, such as the Olayan, Jufaili, and al-Jomaih families, are big predators in western markets but avoid the limelight. Down the road in Dubai, the hyper-development may have been fuelled by the region's petrodollars, but the government has profited heavily from land and property sales, tourism and commerce.

The city's investment houses, Istithmar and Dubai International Capital, have recycled much of these profits abroad as the city has emerged as the Gulf's business capital.

Like Dubai's loud marketing machine, these firms have taken on a more high-profile approach, bankers say.

Dubai International Capital, owned by Sheikh Mohammed, took advantage of HSBC's US subprime woes to buy a $1bn stake. DIC's other UK investments have included Tussauds Group, netting it £200m in two years, as well the purchase of the Doncasters engineering group and Travelodge.

DIC's HSBC stake was the first in its $10bn global equities fund, which the company has said will invest in 10-15 Fortune Global 500 groups.

DIC's domestic government-owned competitors, Istithmar and Dubai Group, have also looked at banking stakes, with Istithmar taking 2.7 per cent of Standard Chartered.

Dubai Group has taken stakes in Greece's Marfin Financial and Bank Islam Malaysia. Istithmar, which reports to a different wing of the Dubai government but is still owned by Sheikh Mohammed, is rapidly developing its real estate and leisure wing. The firm is understood to hold 15 per cent of its real estate assets in the UK, with about 50 per cent in the US.

Freedom of Press in Saudi Arabia

At present the Arab press is divided into a Saudi-owned press, a Saudi controlled press, a press controlled by the GCC and other countries friendly to Saudi Arabia who are loath to offend it and a small number of publications which oppose them and are fighting against huge odds. And the Saudis are still buying the loyalty of an increasing number of Western journalists.

Saudi Arabia has few safeguards to protect press freedom. Article 39 of the Basic Law exhorts the media to promote unity and bans material that “may compromise the security of the State and its public image.” While the 1982 Royal Decree for Printed Material and Publications upholds freedom of expression, it restricts press freedom by limiting the range of topics permitted to be covered. Criticism of the royal family and the religious authorities is forbidden. Violations are considered criminal offenses, punishable with imprisonment and/or fines.

Russian Stabilization Fund

More recently, Russia launched the Stabilization Fund, which has received every dollar of oil revenue above a certain price since 2004 and is now worth more than $100bn.

More recently, talk of a bid for Centrica, the UK utility, by Russia's Gazprom sparked widespread concerns last year in a country known for its openness to foreign bidders. The government was divided over the possibility that an arm of the Russian state could take effective control of the company that distributes gas to much of the British market.

Asian Funds

Singapore – Temasek Holdings

A second type of Sovereign Wealth Fund was created by Singapore to invest its foreign exchange reserves for higher returns than the government bonds that are usually held to fend off speculative attacks on currencies. Temasek Holdings, established in 1974, has an $85bn portfolio that includes stakes in Singapore Airlines, India's ICICI Bank, China Construction Bank and Standard Chartered, the UK emerging markets bank. The Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC), created in 1981, owns overseas equities, bonds and property worth more than $200bn.

Entities controlled by the governments of China and Singapore are offering to take a substantial stake in Barclays, giving it more heft in its effort to pull off the world’s largest banking merger, with ABN Amro.

China Investment Corporation

China recently announced its intention to launch the China Investment Corporation with $200bn to invest. But with many Asian countries accumulating foreign exchange reserves far in excess of what is needed to protect their exchange rates, the amount of money diverted into Sovereign Wealth Funds is forecast to rise sharply.

In 2005, CNOOC, the Chinese state-controlled oil company, was forced by Congressional opposition to drop its $18.5bn bid for Unocal, the US energy group. Supporters of Chevron, the domestic rival bidder that won Unocal instead, had portrayed CNOOC as a front for Beijing's strategic energy interests.

China's $3bn investment last month invested in the initial public offering of Blackstone, the US private equity group. Perhaps chastened by previous experiences, the Chinese won an informal nod from the Treasury in advance of taking a 9.9 per cent non-voting stake.

Strategic Technology and Media Control
Nuclear Technology – Kazakhstan

Kazatomprom, Kazakhstan's state atomic energy agency, one of the world's leading uranium producers, is negotiating to acquire 10% of the Westinghouse Electric stake for about 486.3 million dollars as part of its strategy to transform itself into a global company involved in all aspects of the nuclear power generation cycle. Westinghouse Electric, the US nuclear systems company is owned by Toshiba. Toshiba, which took control of Westinghouse last year, hopes to use the share sale to Kazatomprom to improve its access to uranium supplies, an increasingly important factor in Westinghouse's ability to win contracts to build nuclear power stations. All real power in Kazakhstan is concentrated in the hands of Nursultan Nazarbayev, the authoritarian president, prompting concern about the long-term stability of the regime.

According to AFP Kazakhstan to buy Westinghouse stake from Toshiba Japan and Kazakhstan have agreed to cooperate in uranium-processing technology and trade.

US government approval is required for transactions in which a foreign entity takes a stake in an American business possessing nuclear technology, the Nikkei said.

US officials have indicated that the deal poses no problems, the newspaper added.

Analysts maintain that Kazakhstan's nuclear cooperation with the United States will allow Astana already in 2014 to replace its uranium exports (including those to Russia) with finished products with a high added value. Now that Astana has bought shares in America's Westinghouse company, Russia may lose lucrative contracts for the construction of power plants in the CIS. “If Westinghouse combines its commercial activities with political support from the White House, Astana's multi-directional policy in the nuclear field will become one more test for the relations between the Russian and Kazakh leaders. Moreover, Russia's irritation with the American direction of Kazakh energy cooperation may be just as great as its disappointment with Kazakhstan's participation in oil and gas projects bypassing Russian territory.” (Delovaya nedelya, July 27).

Kingdom Holding Company – Media and Finance

“In an article—Arab Boycott Campaign Worries US Business, appearing on the Palestine Solidarity Campaign website there are quotations of particular interest given below. The quotations are from billionaire Saudi businessman HRH Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. Prince Alwaleed is a major investor in Citigroup, TimeWarner, News Corp. etc. Prince Alwaleed is the Chairman of the Kingdom Holding Company headquartered in Saudi Arabia. At the inauguration of his new Four Seasons hotel in Damascus on March 24, 2006 he is seen on the right side of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. According to Bryan Whitman a senior Defense Department spokesman, “there's no doubt” that Iraq has experienced problems along its western border with Syria, where terrorist crossings into Iraq have been alleged to occur.”

Although Kingdom Holding Company is not a Sovereign Wealth Fund, it does illustrate the influence of the wealth transfer.

Come August 2007, the Wall Street Journal chief executive is Murdoch’s “dance partner.” We have seen the degree of concern over News Corp's acquisition of The Wall Street Journal, most not understanding the close relationship of Kingdom holding Company and News Corp. How differently should one feel about a direct investment stake of a foreign government in a media or publishing company?

According to an associated Press article on August 4, China Curbs Foreign Satellite TV: “China is cracking down on cable television operators who offer unauthorized foreign satellite broadcasts — the communist government's latest bid to maintain its monopoly on information, a newspaper reported Saturday.” The highest profile victim of the crackdown could be Hong Kong's Phoenix satellite news channel, hugely popular among China's urban middle class and received in millions of homes across the country despite the restrictions. Murdoch's News Corp. also owns an 18% stake in Phoenix TV, a joint venture based in Hong Kong that was supposed to be News Corp.'s entrée to the Chinese TV market.

According to an article by Erik Sass in the Media Daily News: WSJ Says China Coverage Won't Change:

“Although Murdoch is reportedly frustrated by Chinese media controls and protectionist policies, his continuing business interests in China have fueled suspicion that he would adulterate content at his media companies to placate the Chinese government. In fact, StarTV has already bowed to political pressure on more than one occasion.”

“In 1994, for example, it yanked BBC World Service from its lineup after its coverage of the Chinese government grew too critical. And in 1998, HarperCollins, also owned by News Corp., canceled a book by the former governor of Hong Kong that was critical of the Chinese government.”

“This track record prompted The Wall Street Journal's Beijing bureau to write an open letter in May urging the Dow Jones board not to sell the company to Murdoch. It feared that would mean an end to investigative reporting in China, which has won two Pulitzer Prizes in recent years. The highly critical letter noted Murdoch's “well-documented history of making editorial decisions in order to advance his business interests in China and, indeed, of sacrificing journalistic integrity to satisfy personal or political aims.””

It is worth reviewing an interview with Prince Alwaleed bin Talal that appeared in the Financial Times by Simon Kuper on December 2, 2005, Lunch with the FT: Royal subjects. The lunch took place at his hotel the George V in Paris. He is the world’s fifth richest man, worth an estimated $21.5bn., he tends to own things. There are his chunks of Citigroup and News Corp, not to mention EuroDisney, Canary Wharf, Hewlett-Packard, Time Warner and so on. One of his grandfathers founded Saudi Arabia and the other was independent Lebanon’s first prime minister. Not content with being rich, the prince also believes he has a divinely ordained role to bring together “east and west”.

As Simon Kuper waited for the prince in the George V’s lobby the prince hangs with his buddies, Richard Parsons, chairman and chief executive of Time Warner, and Sandy Weill, then chairman of Citigroup. Then he goes to pray.

The next day he will be signing deals with Harvard and Georgetown universities to finance some of their Islamic studies. It’s all part of bridging the gap. “That’s why we focus on the east coast of America. Because that’s where the decision-making process is, with all respect to west coast, north coast, or south coast.”

The prince’s most famous attempt at bridging failed. He donated $10m to New York City after the September 11 attacks. But he also called on the US government to “adopt a more balanced stance towards the Palestinian cause”. Rudolph Giuliani, New York’s then mayor, returned the check, and accused him of trying to justify the attacks. A Saudi newspaper later quoted the prince blaming “Jewish pressures” for Giuliani’s rejection.

Yet as the prince knows, not everyone has a gleaming image of Saudi Arabia. Americans got particularly angry when 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11 turned out to be Saudis. Did the prince take stakes in western media companies partly so that he could help clear up east-west misunderstandings?

He begins with the standard denial: “My investment in the United States is not really to influence public policy.” But then he adds: “When I meet Mr. Murdoch of News Corp, that owns Fox News, and BSkyB, or when I meet Mr. Parsons, who controls CNN, Fortune magazine, People, Time, America Online, I don’t intrude into the management of these companies. However, I do convey to them the message about where I believe they went wrong. It’s their discretion to decide what to do. My job is to open their eyes to things they may not have seen.”

Could His Highness give an example? “One time CNN, they brought the Palestinians’ so-called terrorist act against Israelis. I communicated to them, ‘Look, you have to give the other side of the equation. Look what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians.’ And they did that. And they were censured and reprimanded by the Israelis. I do not claim it’s my right to intrude. But I have to do my best to try to influence events.”

At News Corp, the prince is currently helping Murdoch rebuff an attack from the investor John Malone. No doubt it is for literary reasons alone that Murdoch’s HarperCollins has just published the hagiography Alwaleed: Businessman, Billionaire, Prince by the former CNN anchor Riz Khan. The prince has a copy by his side. “Forwarded by President Carter,” he remarks. Then he says: “Yeah, it’s being forwarded by President Carter. President Carter. By President Carter.”

“Wow,” I finally reply.

“President Carter,” he says.

Conclusion

Because they are driven by governments of the totalitarian and Authoritarian Great Powers, they compel countries to take immediate attention. In order to address the threats to the US and European Union, the policies of the countries should be harmonized and individual countries should not go-it-alone in response to such an important global issue.

The key elements that need to be addressed are:

  • Transparency of the funds ownership, management and investment philosophy.
  • Reciprocity – the country must be as open to investment as the host country in which the SWF wishes to invest.
  • Common ownership rules among the countries. There must be limitations in investment beyond a certain limit above which the SWF cannot go without host government approval. Care must be taken especially with investments in sensitive areas as security, defense, banking and media.
  • The US and the EU must address the energy independence and continuing investment in terrorist states.
  • The US must address its balance of payments and foreign trade deficit.

Although many will regard these proposals as protectionist and restrictions of foreign trade, it will be equally dangerous to allow the growth of the SWFs to become entrenched as a feature of the world economy and a tool of asymmetric warfare to implement the Final Jihad of the Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance.


David J. Jonsson is the author of Clash of Ideologies —The Making of the Christian and Islamic Worlds, Xulon Press 2005. His new book: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance (Salem Communications (May 30, 2006). He received his undergraduate and graduate degrees in physics. He worked for major corporations in the United States and Japan and with multilateral agencies that brought him to more that fifteen countries with significant or majority populations who are Muslim. These exposures provided insight into the basic tenants of Islam as a political, economic and religious system. He became proficient in Islamic law (Shariah) through contract negotiation and personal encounter. David can be reached at: djonsson2000@yahoo.co.uk

Labels:

Monday, July 16, 2007

Costs Spiral for LNG Projects - Dan Amoss

by Dan Amoss

Russia, Iran, and Qatar control the largest natural gas resources in the world — enough to dominate the future business of shipping liquefied natural gas (LNG) to consumers around the world. But of the three, Russia and Iran don't even show up as LNG exporters in the trade statistics. According to the latest BP Statistical Review, the three biggest exporters of LNG are Qatar, Indonesia, and Malaysia.

Russia and Iran have legacies of Marxist policies and generally have trouble getting along with their neighbors, so they haven't exactly been fostering the type of environments that attract international investment. And investment is what they both desperately need.

Iran is a basket case, and as long as the clinically insane are running the show, the country is unlikely to attract the investments in technology and capital assets it needs to transform its natural gas reserves into a tradable commodity. But Russia is apparently open to foreign investment, as long as that foreign ownership is limited to small, non-controlling stakes.

Despite all the headlines of Russia confiscating big projects started by international oil companies, the country doesn't want them out entirely. On July 9, BBC News reported that state-controlled gas giant Gazprom, after discovering how difficult and costly it would be, is sheepishly reapproaching the companies it had kicked out of the Shtokman gas project:

"Russian gas monopoly Gazprom has said it is close to pairing with foreign firms to start developing the world's largest offshore gas field.

"The comments made by one of the firm's top executives, Alexander Medvedev, mark a dramatic U-turn from its tough stance last year.

"Last October, Gazprom said it alone would exploit the untapped Shtokman gas reserves in the Barents Sea.

"Signing a deal would be a major boost for any of the overseas firms involved.

"Norway's Statoil and Hydro, ConocoPhillips and Chevron in the U.S., and France's Total had all been shortlisted as potential members of a consortium to start pumping gas from the strategically crucial Shtokman field on the ice-free Kola Peninsula.

"But Gazprom dealt them all a huge blow last October when its chief executive Alexey Miller said Gazprom would take control of 100% of the resources.

"The 1,400-square-kilometer field has the potential to become the world's largest offshore gas field with 3.2 trillion cubic meters of gas contained in reservoirs 2 kilometers below the seabed -- itself at a depth of 350 meters.

"The cost of the operation has been estimated at between $20-30 billion, which Gazprom would have to foot if it decided to go it alone.

"Mr. Medvedev [said] Gazprom was in talks with foreign companies to allow them to 'share in the economic benefits of the project, share the management, and take on a share of the industrial, commercial, and financial risks.'

"This would be through overseas companies taking a stake in the company created to operate Shtokman, while Gazprom will retain control of the license to the field."

To place it into context, Shtokman's estimated reserves of 3.2 trillion cubic meters translate to about 113 trillion cubic feet, or the amount of gas the entire U.S. economy consumed over the past five years.

This is a smart move on Gazprom's part because the estimated development cost of $20-30 billion is probably a fraction of what it will ultimately turn out to be. Many projects that resemble Shtokman in scope and complexity are struggling with major cost overruns.

This plays right into the hands of companies like Chicago Bridge & Iron, Foster Wheeler, and the infamous Iraq contractor Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR — recently spun out of Halliburton). The stocks of these companies are expensive for good reason: They're all big players in the engineering and construction of LNG liquefaction terminals, so their businesses will benefit as this market grows and continues to experience cost inflation.

Despite the fact that it's proceeding at a slow and expensive pace, the continued growth in liquefaction capacity raises the possibility of the LNG market eventually looking like the oil market does today — with a few players dictating the terms under which they'll export gas. Rumors of a planned OPEC-like natural gas cartel have even popped up in recent months.

But they are way ahead of their time.

In order for a gas cartel to develop, its members must control huge shares of low-cost global gas production and cooperate to suppress supply. Not to mention the fact that the majority of gas consumption would have to be shipped via LNG — rather than pipeline — so it can be sold to the highest bidder (like the oil industry). The LNG market may not develop to this degree for another 20 years, if ever.

Petroleum Review Sees Cost Pressure in LNG "Megaprojects"

Chris Skrebowski, editor of Petroleum Review, follows the progress of major LNG projects as closely as he follows major oil projects. Drawing from his observations of the Energy Institute's IP Week conference, Skrebowski explains that the marginal cost of LNG is increasing rapidly:

"Considerable uncertainty remains for projects due to startup in 2010 and later. In the course of a presentation during IP Week, Andy Flower, an LNG consultant, produced a listing of projects that had been expected to get final investment decisions (FIDs) in 2006. This is because no FIDS have been signed off in the last 18 months."

Apparently, a lot of engineering and design work is under way, but companies remain hesitant to fully commit capital to liquefaction projects. Rapid increases in Greenfield construction costs have "reversed all unit costs reductions in the last 20 years. This means new liquefaction trains will have markedly higher unit costs than recently built ones."

Since Asian and European markets will experience growing demand for reliable supplies of seaborne LNG, the regasification terminals slated for construction on the Gulf Coast (primarily by publicly traded Cheniere Energy) may face the prospect of having to pay unprofitably high prices to import LNG to the U.S. "The problem is that the lack of new [liquefaction] projects is now certain to produce a supply shortfall around 2012 [emphasis added]. The time from [final investment decision] to first gas is normally around four years," writes Skrebowski.

U.S. Gas Supply Will Rely More Upon LNG and Drilling Activity

What does a potential shortage of LNG by 2012 mean for U.S. gas consumers? First and foremost, it means that the U.S. must keep drilling intensely on its own land to maintain the domestic gas production its home heating, electricity, and petrochemical industries rely heavily upon.

The big white space in this chart is the portion of U.S. gas demand that's fulfilled by homegrown drilling. About 80% of gas demand is produced locally, while 17-20% is piped in from Canada (shown in blue) and 3-5% is imported as LNG (shown in red) — mostly from Trinidad and Tobago:

Zooming in to a smaller scale shows the trends since January 2001. Pipeline imports from Canada decline each year during the "spring breakup." When the ground thaws each spring in Canada, it becomes too soft to move around heavy drilling equipment, so production and exports to the U.S. temporarily decline:

But beyond the seasonal swings in gas imports from Canada, an important trend is emerging. I make note of it in the chart above. A growing share of Canadian gas production will be consumed by tar sands projects as production is projected to grow by a few million barrels per day over the next decade; this mined substance consumes a great deal of natural gas as it's upgraded into useable fuel.

Furthermore, in its quest to cut down on carbon emissions, the Canadian government is pushing for the replacement of its coal-fired power plants with gas-fired plants. So what remains of Canadian gas resources may eventually be piped to domestic power plants, rather than exported to the U.S.

A final blow to U.S. pipeline imports: Gas supplies will continue to be limited as long as the Canadian rig count remains near the bottom of its five-year range. Last Halloween's decision by the Canadian government to phase out the tax-favored status of energy trusts not only upset scores of income investors; it also dramatically curtailed drilling projects that are vital to sustain oil and gas production — and exports to the U.S.

So despite the fact that LNG imports have grown to satisfy about 3-5% of U.S. demand, this is no reason to expect gas prices to collapse. In fact, this 3-5% figure will have to double and triple in the coming years to compensate for lower Canadian imports.

Lastly, a look at domestic gas production (the maroon section of this chart) shows a flat trend since 2001. This has occurred even as the rig count has soared. So the U.S. will need a healthy, growing domestic drilling rig fleet to avoid shortages in the future:

Rising Drilling Intensity Reveals Need for Rig Fleet Overhaul

As many industry and government sources point out, the U.S. sits on plenty of untapped natural gas resources — especially "unconventional" gas. This is gas that's "nonassociated," meaning it's not a byproduct of oil production, and it requires more significant investment in fracturing and pressure-pumping services to start and maintain production. On the bright side, the best operators in unconventional plays experience drilling success rates north of 95%; so it's more of a manufacturing operation than it is "wildcatting."

But the key aspect to remember about growing unconventional gas drilling activity is that it will require a large rig count and a growing oil field service industry.

In a Feb. 27 Strategic Investment weekly update entitled "Opportunity in Unconventional Natural Gas," I wrote:

"I constructed the following two charts to illustrate this rising trend in drilling intensity. This information is publicly available on the Web sites of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) and oil field equipment and service company Baker Hughes.

"The blue line is the Baker Hughes Natural Gas Rig count in the 'lower 48' United States, including offshore basins. By 'gas' rigs, Baker Hughes refers to rigs drilling for natural gas in U.S. territory. Out of the total U.S. rig count, gas rigs now comprise about 84% of active rigs, with oil rigs comprising the other 16%:

"As you can see, 10 years of monthly data refute the oft-repeated line, 'Newly built drilling rigs coming online will lead to a glut of natural gas and cause prices to crash.' This is cited as a reason why so many drilling and E&P stocks remain cheap.

"The second chart combines the two data sets from the first chart — it's monthly U.S. gas production divided by the monthly rig count. A simple regression line shows a clear trend running from 3 bcf per month per rig 10 years ago to 1 bcf per month per rig in 2006:

"What conclusions can we draw from this chart? Well, it lends heavy support to the view that drilling demand will more than absorb any increase in the rig population. Most E&P companies are earning huge returns on invested capital at current gas prices. So they will bid aggressively to put newly built rigs to work on their drilling projects.

"Another conclusion? Just maintaining current natural gas production will require a steady uptrend in rig activity (the blue line in the first chart). This can be achieved by building more rigs and refurbishing the huge population of rusted-out rigs left over from the early 1980s drilling boom…

"So disregard headlines about the impending wave of new rigs destroying the drillers' profit margins. Many will be put to work on unconventional gas projects where break-even gas prices are in the $2-4 per mcf range. Unconventional gas production is very drilling intensive because operators are seeing 60-70% production decline rates after the first year of production from a new well."

So what investment conclusions can we draw from the trends transforming the natural gas industry?

First, growth in LNG trade is important to satisfy demand. Most of the world's largest gas resources are located far away from major population centers, as you can see by looking at the map of the Shtokman field. There's no shortage of LNG shipping or regasification capacity at the moment, but there's a growing shortage of liquefaction capacity. Once the billions are ultimately spent to build out this capacity, U.S. importers may very well have to outbid Asian and European customers for LNG. This makes U.S. gas drilling activity all the more important.

Second, since the existing land drilling industry was largely constructed during the early 1980s oil boom, most of its equipment is nearing the end of its useful life. Lots of new rigs are being constructed, but they'll be necessary to replace those that are retiring. This trend is long lasting and will favor forward-looking rig operators and equipment companies.

Despite its week-to-week ups and downs, there's a sustainable boom under way in manufacturing, refurbishing, and operating the equipment necessary to meet the demanding drilling environment of the 21st century.

Good investing,
Dan Amoss, CFA

For Whiskey and Gunpowder

Dan Amoss is managing editor of Strategic Investment, the highly respected US newsletter. Previously Dan worked at Investment Counselors of Maryland - investment advisors tor one of America's top small-cap value mutual funds over the past 15 years.

Labels: ,

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Summer Sale - Puru Saxena

by Puru Saxena

We are witnessing a generational bull-market in all types of natural resources (energy, food and metals). This boom in commodities is largely due to supply and demand imbalances plus the ongoing monetary inflation which is adding fuel to the fire.

Today, the various central banks continue to pump money and credit into the system and combined with the rising per-capita consumption levels in Asia and Latin America, you can begin to understand why the prices of commodities are at record-highs.

For sure, this sector has already risen considerably in this bull-market, however I suspect that the uptrend will continue for several more years. Firstly, back in 2001, natural resources were the cheapest they had ever been in the history of capitalism, so this advance has commenced from a very depressed level. Secondly, when adjusted for inflation (even via the bogus official CPI data which understates the inflation menace), commodities remain extremely cheap (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Is this a bubble?

Source: www.thechartstore.com

These days, some analysts are claiming that this bull-market in commodities is solely due to monetary inflation and that supply and demand imbalances have no influence whatsoever. I tend to disagree with their assessment because constant monetary inflation has been our reality since the early 1970's when gold was removed from the monetary system YET the prices of commodities (energy, food and metals) declined significantly between 1980 and 2001. So, it is clear that the debasement of currencies alone is not responsible for the ongoing surge in the prices of commodities.

In order to have a lasting bull-market in any sector, supply and demand must be out of whack. In the case of natural resources today, demand is rising ferociously in China and India whilst supply is struggling. Consider the energy market as an example: At the beginning of this decade, China and India combined used to consume roughly 8% of the world's oil and today they consume over 11%. Now, to illustrate my point that supply and demand are important factors, I would add that this rising demand (regardless of monetary inflation) would not have translated into a higher oil price IF there was an endless supply of oil. In the current scenario however, the oil price is rising because supplies are extremely tight when compared to demand. In fact, I would argue that humanity is staring "Peak Oil" in its face.

Today the average Chinese consumes less that 2 barrels of oil per year and the average Indian consumes less than a barrel of oil per year whereas the average American consumes 25 barrels per year. After reviewing this data, you don't have to be a rocket-scientist to figure out that demand for energy in Asia can only rise in the future. And unless we can find a way to increase supply, the price of oil will continue to appreciate.

If you have invested in commodities, you will be thrilled to learn that apart from energy, the inventory levels of other resources such as base-metals or food are also extremely depleted. And these stock-piles are low due to the sudden and unexpected surge in demand brought about by the rapid industrialisation and urbanisation of China, India and parts of Latin America. A growing percentage of the three billion people in the "emerging" economies are now putting immense pressure on the planet's resources as consumers and the scramble to find more commodities is on. Exploration activity, whether for metals or energy, is at multi-year highs and I suspect that billions of dollars will be spent in the years ahead as nations desperately look for additional resources to feed demand.

It is interesting to note that after the brutal correction in commodities last year, energy, food and base-metals have recovered, however the precious metals have failed to rally. Moreover, if you compare the performance of the various commodities over the past 5 years, you will realise that industrial commodities (base metals and energy) have outperformed the precious metals by a wide margin. This was expected as the economic activity has been very strong recently and gold is a counter-cyclical asset. No doubt, it has been frustrating for investors to watch their gold holdings drift lower for a year. Despite the recent underperformance, I continue to believe that gold is also in a gigantic bull-market which has a long way to run.

You must understand that in the case of base-metals (copper, lead, zinc, nickel and tin), changes in industrial demand and physical supply cause prices to rise or fall. However, when it comes to gold, investment demand alone is the single most important factor that can make or break a bull-market. And the investment demand for gold is directly linked to the public's inflation expectations.

If the masses are worried about future inflation, they tend to convert their cash to gold as a store of value. On the other hand, when the public is calm about inflation, the reverse takes place.

Banks are in the business of lending paper currencies so it is absolutely vital for their survival that the public's confidence in the monetary system remains high and that inflation expectations remain under control. Every central banker knows that if the public really understood the inflation problem, the monetary system would come under strain. So far, the central banks have done a fabulous job of managing the public's inflation expectations. However, I am of the opinion that this is about to change. As soon as the public realises that inflation is much higher than the official CPI data, we could see a stampede towards gold.

Recently, precious metals have drifted lower which is typical at this time of the year. In fact, the wonderful summer sale in on! Remember, corrections during a bull-market are opportunities rather than a problem. Once this consolidation is complete this summer, I expect precious metals to soar towards the end of this year.

In summary, I believe that every investor should take advantage of this correction in metals and allocate a meaningful portion of their net-worth to the resources sector. Rather than buying the physical commodities through index-tracker funds (due to the negative impact of contango), I suggest investors allocate their hard-earned capital to resource-producing companies which in this raging bull-market are still trading at bear-market valuations!

Puru Saxena
www.purusaxena.com

Puru Saxena is the founder of Puru Saxena Limited. Vastly experienced and respected in his field, he is a registered investment adviser with the SFC. He conducts in-depth economic research and formulates our firm's investment strategy.

Puru Saxena has a decade’s experience in the finance industry, specifically relating to investment advice and asset management.

He is a regular guest on various media such as CNN, BBC, Bloomberg TV, CNBC, RTHK, NDTV and TVB Pearl.

Labels:

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

“Tin Men” - Fred Sheehan

by Fred Sheehan

Some may remember the movie Tin Men. Set in Baltimore during the 1960s, the main characters, Danny DeVito and Richard Dreyfuss, make a living selling aluminum siding for houses. They are part of a quickmoney operation that leaves customers possibly defrauded and certainly disillusioned. The main plot pits the two against each other in a brawl that eventually destroys DeVito’s marriage. The camera periodically cuts to a courtroom where hearings are held of the shenanigans used to entice customers. DeVito and Dreyfuss are oblivious to the proceedings even though the dubious operation is front-page news. Their battle for one-upmanship, DeVito’s wife, and aluminum-siding sales completely ignores the noose that eventually falls on them, after testimony has condemned them. Whatever crimes (if any) they committed are incidental in political circles, compared to the image contrived of the bureaucrats doing their all to protect the Little Man. One could deduce that devious practices were old hat by the time the authorities decided to act, possibly having collected their own booty before feigning disgust and doling out retribution.

There is little that is new in the current private-equity, hedge-fund, prime-broker, rating-agency, derivative mixture. The question seems to be how the borrowing and leveraging will end. If past is prologue, it will be the politicians who will shut the door. This will be (at least, it always has been) after the tide has turned. (The nature of legislation is reactive.) The current boom is coagulating into the same, dark mixture that drowned the market twice before — in the late 1960s and the late 1980s. The timeline of the earlier periods is repeating itself today: the limited attraction of a new bull market, the massive attraction of an aging bull market, the publicity drawn to victors in a moribund bull market, the overinvestment and overleveraging of funds that lead to a bear market, criminality, and bankruptcy. It is the latter two developments so essential to political involvement: these are tangible (and inevitable) developments. Poor coverage ratios and the structure of payment-in-kind bonds will not make the Congressional docket.

On December 31, 1949, the Dow Jones Industrial Average traded at a price-to-earnings ratio of 7.6:1, with a dividend yield of 7.1%. The yield on the AAA-rated long-bond was 2.7%. The most heavily shorted stocks were automobile manufacturers. The stock market was of limited attraction. It peaked in 1966, swooned, rose, unravelled in 1969, recovered in the early 1970s, then collapsed in 1973 and 1974. The smart money stood aside as the young and restless came to dominate activity. In 1967, Richard Jenrette, co-founder of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, defined the “great garbage market”, in which old stalwarts like GM and GE were ignored. The public was drawn to United Convalescent Homes and Minnie Pearl’s Chicken System, Inc. New hedge funds opened nearly every day. By 1969, trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange of over 20 million shares a day forced the market to close on certain afternoons.

Conglomerates were the fashionable contraptions composed of unrelated businesses that were better operated under one roof. At least, that was the current wisdom. When they burst into prominence, the public was caught by such surprise, the New York Times was at a loss for words: its society pages would clumsily classify the victors as “conglomerateurs”. Until this need to classify arose, a conglomerate was a rock. These rocks were diamonds, in the speculating public’s view.

Of most importance, as in all financial structures, were the foundations. The foundations grew less stable as they carried more weight. Rising trading volume and the insatiable appetite of hedge funds were a worry, though the bulls thought just the opposite. In 1968, 4,500 mergers were consummated (far more than in any previous year), and 26 of the largest 500 companies were absorbed into conglomerates.

What follows is a case study of an illusion. In a populist age, accumulation of money and companies makes for a fragile empire. Those clever enough to leverage their capital — financial and intellectual — may look upon their fiefdom as a fortress. In the end, they have no more power than the political establishment permits. The establishment is willing to concede much (political and financial interests are often aligned), but those who fly the highest risk the fate of Icarus.

The case of Saul Steinberg v. The Establishment fits the chronological pattern, financially and sociologically, that we see today. At the age of 21, Steinberg started a computer leasing business. It took him three months to lease his first computer. “Ideal Leasing” was incorporated in 1962. In 1964, with earnings of US$255,000 and revenues of US$1.8 million, Steinberg took his re-named “Leasco” public. By 1966, profits had jumped to US$2 million. Leasco stock soared. Steinberg used the stock to buy a flock of companies. He started acquiring shares of Reliance Insurance Company, an established, Philadelphia propertyand- casualty insurance company. With an ever-rising stock price, he took control over the next 11 months. Now, 80% of Leasco’s revenues were from insurance and 20% from leases.

This was only possible because the public had grown stark, raving mad over Leasco stock: the establishment’s back was against the wall. Leasco appreciated 5,410% over the five years (1964 through 1968). For simple comparisons to later periods, this may be regarded as money loaned with very little chance of cash repayment (in the form of security appreciation, profits, coupon payments, dividend payments).

Steinberg, now 29 years old, set his sights on a large bank — “a New-York, money-center bank with international connections”. He threw darts and Chemical Bank was the target, the sixth-largest commercial bank in the United States.

The leader of Chemical, William Renchard, Princeton graduate, member of the right clubs, director of a half-dozen major corporations, trustee of several hospitals and civic organisations, was not pleased. Nor was the board of directors, which included the chairmen of AT&T and of du Pont, the president of IBM, a member of the executive committee of Texaco, and a former president of the New York Stock Exchange.

Steinberg prepared a tender offer, then called Renchard. Renchard suggested they meet for lunch. He sent his car for Steinberg; they met at Chemical Bank’s executive dining room. Of this duel, John Brooks wrote: “there was a sense of backs to the wall, of barbarians at the gate …”. The phrase, attributed to the late 1980s, was already in play.

To thwart the barbarian, Renchard engaged the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore. Cravath drafted legislation, then sent it to both Albany and Washington. The new laws would specifically prevent a nonblank taking over a bank. Governor Rockefeller (whose brother David ran the Chase Bank) urged the New York Legislature to adopt such a bill. A similar bill was sent to Senator John J. Sparkman of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee. Renchard called William McChesney Martin, chairman of the Federal Reserve, known as the “Boy Wonder” when he was chairman of the New York Stock Exchange. Renchard apprised Martin of the situation. Leasco stock fell to US$115 — it had been US$140 before the bid was announced. The stock started to fall the day the tender offer was announced — quite unexpectedly, given speculators’ fever for more and bigger conglomerates. Did the Establishment manipulate the stock market? The question was asked by many.

Steinberg next received a letter from the Justice Department. The letter did not suggest that such a transaction would violate anti-trust laws, but that, “questions under these laws are raised thereby, particularly under Section 7 of the Clayton Act”. (The reader may look it up; no doubt, Steinberg needed outside counsel, too.) Steinberg stewed over the situation at a hotel in Dorado Beach (owned by Laurence Rockefeller) before going to Washington where he met with several members of the Senate Banking and Currency Committee and with members of the Federal Reserve Board. Steinberg found his timing was poor: “The nation’s legislators were in a grimly anti-conglomerate, anti-takeover mood.”

Steinberg — brash and irrepressible as he was — lost his nerve when he met with Senator Sparkman. As Steinberg relates, Sparkman said: “By the way, have you seen the bill I’m going to introduce against bank takeovers? (Calling to his secretary) Miss —, where’s the bill the lawyer from Chemical Bank sent in? I want to show it to Mr. Steinberg.”

Concurrently, the conglomerate craze was ending in caricature. The hostile takeover of Hartford Fire Insurance Company by International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT) was notorious for several reasons — one being Lazard Freres’ advisory fee of well over US$1 million.

Northwest Industries (clothing, pesticides, steel) attempted to buy out B.F. Goodrich. Goodrich volleyed with the standard retaliation tactics — it changed its accounting method, it went on a buyout spree of its own — then it, too, took the line of defence that no amount of financial heft can defeat — it turned to the politicians. The Ohio Attorney General issued an injunction against the merger; the Justice Department brought an antitrust suit to block it.

By analogy, DeVito and Dreyfuss are fighting each other and not reading the headlines. How might this end? On the simplest level, the math stopped working. Smoke-and-mirrors cannot hide an investment unable to pay its bills. When the foundations buckled, a few — and then the many — asked themselves whether the very idea of conglomerates made sense. From a non-mathematical perspective, the ambitions grew too large, the conglomerateurs too vulgar, the hoi polloi got stiffed, and the politicians decided to act. Time magazine spoke for the many. The March 7, 1969 cover asked: “Takeovers in High Gear: Threat or Boon to U.S. Business?” (Pictures of “LTV’s Ling”, “Gulf & Western’s Bluhdorn”, and “Textron’s Miller” adorned the cover: You know Time’s answer.) Late in the same year, the cover asked: “Will There Be a Recession?” In June 1970, answer to the previous question in hand, Time queried: “Is this Slump Necessary?”

Without the volume and intensity pursuing conglomerates, the stock market deflated. Once “liquidity” reversed (to employ the current word that defines markets that will never fall), it was over. Between January 1969 and October 1970 (roughly the period of the Time triptych), the 28 largest hedge funds lost 70% of their assets. Between November 1969 and November 1970, about 100 brokers and financial firms disappeared. They either became insolvent or were absorbed. (New laws followed to protect the Little Man; the legislators were a bit late.) The Dow only fell 36% between December 1968 (from 985) to May 1970 (to 631), but, as in 2000, the fever ran elsewhere. Dun’s Review constructed indices of the ten leading conglomerates, the ten leading computer companies, and the ten leading technology companies. During that period, these indices fell 86%, 80%, and 77%, respectively.

The garbage market expanded and Wall Street polluted the tank with risky (or worthless) securities. John Brooks told the story of a rising star at a Wall Street firm who fell on the losing end of several court judgments after passing bad cheques. The firm continued to promote him. As the stars grew more powerful, they flaunted it; as egos grew, they needed to do the biggest deal. In the wake of Saul Steinberg’s fall, the 29-year-old reflected, “I always knew there was an establishment — I just always thought that I was a part of it.”

If he had been watching the front covers of Time, Steinberg would have known he was too late.

The 1980s differed as a matter of degree, and probably of criminality, but not of substance. The story is well known. What started as a good idea ended in buffoonery. Michael Milken’s group at the investment–banking house of Drexel Burnham educated the world, then dominated it, in the fertile laboratory of junk bonds. The gluttonous, self-enriching LBO overdose in the second half of the 1980s was different than the refinancing of American corporations of the first half.

The first takeover of a public company by a private-equity firm was in 1979, when Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co. (KKR) bought machine-tool maker Houdaille for US$355 million. This was also the first LBO. It took over a year to find financing, as well it might. The idea of buying a company by loading its balance sheet with debt was new.

It was the meeting of junk bonds and the private-equity firm that created the LBO boom. The early financings were responsibly packaged to permit the companies so structured to cover their debt payments out of projected earnings. In 1980, only 10% of junk bond offerings were for purposes of acquisition; by 1984, this proportion had leapt to 45%. By 1983, future profits (before depreciation and taxes) were projected to be 20% less than annual debt payments. Companies are often forced to make expedient decisions under such pressure. Since workers are the largest expense at most companies, they go.

Saul Steinberg made his own contribution to the English language when he, in effect, blackmailed Disney into paying him US$60 million to call off a takeover bid in 1984. Thus, the very-eighties term “greenmail” came into being. The politicians were growing restless. Legislation mimicking the Chemical-Bank, protection program was drafted. Delaware became the most controversial state in the union with its deep, statutory moat that separated company management from demanding shareholders. An antitakeover measure proposed by Congressman Dan Rostenkowski contributed, to some unknown degree, to the stock market crash of 1987.

After the crash, the stock market recovered, but easy liquidity did not. The deals grew larger, though, with ever more ingenious bonds to finance these monuments to braggadocio. The early Milken bonds included equity participation by the bondholders. From there, the road was trod to zero-coupon bonds and, finally, to payment-in-kind bonds when the company paid nothing at all. It simply issued additional bonds at the imaginary coupon payment date: thus, the “payment-in-kind”. These were generally worthless. At about this time, Michael Milken appeared on the front cover of BusinessWeek. The cover story quoted a Harvard Business School professor who compared Milken to J.P. Morgan.

In 1988, “entrepreneur” (as he was now known) Saul Steinberg paid US$2 million for his daughter’s wedding at the Metropolitan Museum’s Temple of Dendur. This was not a bad thing since it preceded the “tipping point” (to borrow the title of Malcolm Gladwell’s book). But the mood was changing. The catch-phrases — “yuppies”, “the decade of greed”, “Reaganomics” — were repeated endlessly. They offered little in explanation but provided a leitmotif as the public grew disenchanted.

In early 1989, Kohlberg, Kravis paid US$30.9 billion for RJR. This was a very big number. It is difficult for an outsider to assess the efficiencies of such combinations, but they cause anxiety and disorientation. Sneaker jobs were going to Asia. This jumble of numbers and worries is often what we live by. The smorgasbord did not appeal to the tastes of the public or the politicians.

The temper in Washington, already agitated by the growing control of “financial buyers”, grew hostile as the RJR deal gathered greater attention. (The term “financial buyer” was used to differentiate these deals from “corporate buyers” or “strategic buyers.” Corporations were priced out of the merger business.)

Kohlberg, Kravis, and Roberts gathered 400 dealmakers and lawyers at the Pierre Hotel to celebrate. The guests were congratulated for making over US$1 billion in fees. This did not include the junk bond sales and bank loans. Given the times, the dinner received publicity and it was seen as being in poor taste. Michael Milken’s party for Drexel Burnham clients has gone down in history as the “Predator’s Ball”.

Even as the borrowing bubble was peaking, it had already started to deflate. (The analogy in 2007 might be the cracks in the CDO market as private equity continues on its merry way.) In September 1988, Campeau Corporation disclosed a severe cash crunch. Junk bond prices plunged. On December 7, a Drexel Burnham trader turned government witness against the firm. By the end of the month, Drexel Burnham agreed to settle insider trader investigations and paid US$650 in fines. Clients fled the firm. Early in 1989, Michael Milken was indicted on 98 counts of fraud and racketeering.

The junk bond market was stunned, maybe not so much by the problems at Drexel Burnham, but because demand for junk bonds withered. Junk bond issues rose from US$2 billion in 1980 to over US$200 billion in 1988. There was little thought given to market “liquidity”, since buyers could always be found who wanted more. But this was not to be so. On October 13, 1989 a proposed US$6.79 billion management–union buyout of UAL Corporation collapsed. This caused the stock market “crashette”. (The stock market was priced for junk bond-financed buyouts above the value of companies.) Takeover-stock specialists lost US$1 billion on paper. Eric Gleacher, Morgan Stanley head of mergers and acquisitions, was quoted by the Wall Street Journal: “There was a tremendous backlash caused by the RJR deal. It was the biggest blowup we’ve had … in this cycle” of the merger business. In December, KKR placed one of its companies into Chapter 11 proceedings — Hillsborough Holdings, the first ever bankruptcy filing by a KKR company. The mystique of LBOs was collapsing — lost jobs and bankruptcy were not in the propaganda filing of the “takeover artists”.

The changing times were evident when Saul Steinberg spent US$1 million at a Southampton summer party in 1989. This was half the cost of the wedding but caused an uproar. Party guests told an inquiring press of their outrage. Other guests noted that the outraged looked mighty pleased at the party. (The rise and fall of Jay Gatsby may come to mind.) The New York Times wrote an editorial about “Plutocrats and Moralizers”. John Kenneth Galbraith followed by quoting Thorstein Veblen. Such consumption is within “the higher stages of the barbarian culture”. Soon after, a best-selling book would immortalise the KKR and RJR Nabisco deal: Barbarians at the Gates.

Regards,
Fred Sheehan

for Whiskey and Gunpowder

Fred Sheehan is columnist and economist with Marc Faber's Gloom, Doom and Boom Report.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Global Exodus from the US Dollar in Motion - Gary Dorsch

by Gary Dorsch

Trading in the arcane world of foreign exchange is often akin to judging a reverse beauty contest. The trick to profitable trading is to pick the least ugly currency. Nearly all fiat or paper currencies are ugly, because the 18 of the world's top-20 central banks are inflating the money supply at double digit rates. At the moment, the world's two ugliest currencies are the Japanese yen and the US dollar.

The Bank of Japan pegs its overnight loan rate at just 0.50%, in a brazen effort to devalue the yen, to boost exports abroad, and prevent an abrupt unwinding of the mushrooming "yen carry" trade. Meanwhile the Federal Reserve is inflating its M3 money supply at a 13.7% annualized clip, according to private economists, which if correct, would be the fastest rate of expansion in more than 30-years.

US Treasury chief Henry Paulson, and former chairman of Goldman Sachs, GS.N, "monitors the financial markets closely," and has reinvigorated the infamous "Plunge Protection Team," which comes to the rescue of the US stock market whenever nasty revelations come to the surface. At the moment, Paulson's grand strategy is to offset losses in the US housing sector with big gains in the stock market, to prevent the US economy from sliding into recession.

A key player in the "Plunge Protection Team" (PPT) is none other than Federal Reserve chief Ben "helicopter" Bernanke. Since the Bernanke Fed discontinued the decades-old reporting of the broad M3 money supply in March of 2006, the growth rate of M3 has accelerated from an 8% rate to a sizzling 13.7% clip, its fastest in more than three decades. The Bernanke Fed is preventing borrowing rates from rising at a time of explosive loan demand for US corporate mergers and takeovers, by rapidly increasing the US money supply.

The Bank of America, Citigroup, and JP Morgan led US loan underwriting in the first half of 2007, which totaled $943 billion, up 5.4% from a year earlier. Global mergers and takeovers soared to an astronomical $2.78 trillion during the first six months of the year, up 51% from a year ago, led by $1.05 trillion in the US alone. Buy-outs by private takeover artists soared 23% to a record high of $568 billion in H'1 2007, with 35% of US takeovers, and 13% of European takeovers financed with debt.

But one sector of the US stock market which has not responded positively to the Fed's heavy injections of monetary steroids has been the home builders, once regarded as a top bull-market leader from 2003 thru August 2005. The Dow Jones Home Construction Index, a yardstick that measures home builder performance, is off 25% this year, and is flirting with key support at the 525 level, which if penetrated, would be especially bearish.

On July 2nd, Paulson sent a discreet signal to Wall Street power-brokers to avoid dumping the home builders. "In terms of housing, it's had a significant impact on the economy. No one is forecasting when, with any degree of clarity, that the upturn in housing is going to come, other than it's at or near the bottom."

The Fed has obscured its money printing operations by discontinuing the reporting of M3, in order to limit the damage to the fixed income markets. But word of the explosive growth of the M3 money supply is slowly leaking out, and taking its toll on the US Treasury Note market, which briefly tumbled to its lowest level in five years in June, lifting 10-year yields as high as 5.30%, before receding back to 5.00%, on a "flight to safety" from the riskiest of the sub-prime home loan market.

Because the US credit markets are swimming in a tidal wave of rising liquidity, there will always be bargain hunters who are happy to park excess cash into the bond market whenever yields surge higher. Asian central banks and Arab Oil kingdoms in particular, have been big buyers of US T-bonds over the past four years, and hold roughly $1.3 trillion of the IOU's, but even this massive intervention couldn't turn the tide of the four-year bear market.

But now there are indications that China's insatiable appetite for US T-bonds is waning. Beijing was a net seller of $5.8 billion of US T-bonds in April, the first drop in Chinese holdings since October 2005, and sparking the recent slide that lifted 10-year yields by 70 basis points, at its high mark. Since Beijing unhinged the dollar from a fixed peg of 8.27 yuan in July 2005, the value of the US 10-year T-note, when converted into yuan, has declined by 15 percent. Earlier today, the dollar slipped to 7.59 yuan, or 8.9% lower since the yuan was freed from the dollar peg.

If Beijing understood the full extent of the Fed's money printing operations, it might think twice about putting its hard earned dollars into Treasury IOU's. Beijing is almost guaranteed to take further losses on its massive $900 billion US bond portfolio, with its secret agreement with Paulson, limiting the dollar's annual devaluation against the Chinese yuan to 5%, to avoid the US Treasury's label of a currency manipulator.

China to diversify future FX Reserves away from US dollar

But China's old guard is finally waking up to reality, and looking for new ways to invest its bulging foreign currency reserves. China's FX reserves have more than tripled in three years after rising $209 billion in 2005, $207 billion in 2004 and $117 billion in 2003, and in the first quarter of 2007 alone, its treasure chest was bloated by a whopping $136 billion to a record $1.2 trillion.

Last Friday, the National People's Congress authorized the Ministry of Finance to set-up the State Investment Company, (SIC), which will invest $200 billion of the country's FX stash, into publicly listed companies, real estate, or private deals around the globe. Mostly likely, at the bottom of the list of possible Chinese investments are US Treasury bonds, which are a losing proposition due to heavy pressure for a further slide of the US dollar against the yuan.

The Ministry of Finance plans to issue 1.55 trillion yuan ($203.49 billion) of bonds to the People's Bank of China (PBoC), in a swap for the FX reserves that will be managed by a new investment fund. But the PBoC is also authorized to re-sell the giant bond offering, which would mop-up liquidity in the Shanghai money markets. If the PBoC parcels out the entire block of bonds, it would have the same effect as lifting the bank reserve requirements by 10 times with a magnitude of 0.5% each.

The sale of 1.55 trillion yuan of these special bonds would be equivalent to more than 50% of the government's 2.9 trillion yuan outstanding debt. China's parliament also authorized the State Council to abolish or reduce the 20% withholding tax levied on interest income. The measure is aimed at staunching the flow of cash into the surging stock market by making bank deposits more attractive.

Cancelling the tax entirely would be the equivalent to an increase in the after-tax one-year deposit rate of about 60 basis points, while a 50% reduction would boost after-tax interest by about 30 basis points. It would also increase the after-tax interest rate on China's 7-year bond by as much as 80 basis points. Already, China's 7-year bond yield has climbed 120 basis points to 4.22% since April 2nd, and now the central bank has new tools to drain liquidity from the money markets.

Higher Chinese interest rates have put a roadblock before the powerful Shanghai red-chip index, which has found stiff resistance at the 4,300 level, but finding support at 3,700. "China should appropriately tighten monetary policy to prevent relatively fast economic growth from overheating, and maintain stability," the People's Bank of China said on July 3rd. The PBoC said it "would resort to a range of monetary policy tools to achieve reasonable growth in money and credit."

With higher after-tax interest rates on Chinese bonds, and pressure on the Fed to lower the fed funds rate due to the sub-prime home loan meltdown, hot money from abroad should continue to flow into the Chinese yuan, greasing the skids for the US dollar's slide against other Asian currencies, such as the Korean won.

Bank of England - Pioneer of "Asset Targeting"

Just about every major central bank has a big credibility problem, when it comes to maintaining the purchasing power of its currency. The Bank of England, for instance, has tolerated double-digit growth of its M4 money supply for the past two years. The BoE is the "Group of Seven's" original pioneer in "asset targeting," or guiding the stock and real estate markets to higher levels, by injecting excess liquidity into the markets, until asset prices reach the bank's targeted levels.

The BoE has guided the Footsie-100 from a low of 3,500 in Q'1 of 2003, to a 7-year high above 6,600 this month. But the BoE's monetary abuse that has taken place over the past few years, is taking its toll on the British debt markets, where the benchmark 10-year gilt fell to a 7-year low in June, lifting its yield to as high as 5.55%, before bargain hunters came out of the woodwork..

"Investors are likely to take advantage of this ample liquidity and the associated easy credit to purchase other assets, driving risk premia down and asset prices up," the BoE said in a February 20th, report for parliament's Treasury Committee. "In due course, those higher asset prices may be expected to feed through into higher demand for goods and prices, putting upward pressure on the general price level."

In a speech to mark the tenth anniversary of the central bank's independence, BoE chief Mervyn King said on May 2nd, "It is unfortunate, if monetary developments are given insufficient attention in the analysis of the inflation outlook. The growth of money and credit may signal in advance of other indicators that the Bank rate is set at a level inconsistent with bringing inflation back to the target in the medium term."

The BoE is well aware of the inflationary consequences of double-digit money supply growth, and London futures markets are pricing in two BoE rate hikes to 6% in the days and months ahead. But the BoE must still overcome stiff political opposition to higher borrowing costs, namely from newly installed prime-minister Gordon Brown. "Rigid monetary rules that assume a fixed relationship between money and inflation do not produce reliable targets or policy," Brown argued on June 14th.

Such reckless comments by Mr Brown, are reminiscent of his decision to sell off more than half of the UK's centuries-old gold reserves in May 1999. The decision to sell 400 tons of gold is seen in City circles as a financial bungle on the scale of the Tories' "Black Wednesday" that cost the taxpayer 3.3 billion pounds. Brown offloaded the gold at a 20-year low in 17-auctions between $256 and $296 /oz, with an average of $275 /oz. Since then gold has risen sharply and stands around $650 /oz.

Judging from the chart above, the BoE is still far behind the monetary inflation curve, and would have to hike its base rate by 100 basis points to 6.50% or higher, to rein-in M4 growth into single digits. Ultimately though, the pressure on the BoE to hike interest rates further will come from the gilt market, which is in danger of a nasty meltdown, unless the central bank lives up to expectations of future rate hikes.

Mitigating some of the pressure for sharply higher BoE rates however, is the strength of the British pound, which climbed above the psychological $2 mark last week, for only the second time since 1980. The British pound is being driven higher by widening interest rate differentials moving in its favor, with the Federal Reserve handcuffed by a weakening housing market and a sub-prime loan debacle.

Both the British pound and US dollar are heavily inflated currencies. Both offer large external trade deficits and big budget deficits. While the Fed is inflating its M3 money supply at a 13.7% clip, the Bank of England is inflating its M4 at a 13.9% annualized clip. But the US economy is roughly six times the size of England's, so in absolute terms, the increase in supply of US dollars is much larger. And with the BoE expected to lift its lending rates to 75 basis points above the US$ rate, the pound is winning this "reverse beauty" contest.

Aussie Dollar Shines with Yield hungry Investors

After breaking thru the long held psychological barrier of 80 US-cents in March, one has to go back 18-years to find the last time the Aussie dollar traded as high as 86 US-cents. There are several reasons why the Aussie dollar is climbing sharply higher against the greenback, but the most commonly cited is higher yields. Yesterday, the yield on Australia's 10-year Treasury bond was +122 basis points (bp) higher than comparable yields on the US T-Note, up from +56 bp in April 2006.

Interest rate differentials play a big role in the FX "reverse beauty" contest, and the Aussie has been underpinned by its relatively attractive yield. Yet why are Aussie bond yields rising relative to US yields? Flush with cash after a string of budget surpluses, the Australian government issues barely enough new paper to cover rolling maturities, keeping bonds outstanding at just A$60 billion, and down from around A$94 billion when Prime Minister John Howard came to power in 1996.

That is in sharp contrast to the United States where total public debt has ballooned by 50% since the turn of the century to reach $8.8 trillion. Issuance of marketable Treasury paper has likewise surged to $5 trillion, with $1.2 trillion of that held by offshore central banks.Aussie T-bonds offer the same triple-A rating, and with an appreciating currency, one might have expected Aussie yields to shrink relative to US T-Note yields. This Aussie yield spread is one of the market's great mysteries.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) isn't thrilled about the sharply higher Aussie dollar, which is bound to hurt exporters and widen the current account deficit, which jumped 20% to A$15.1 billion in Q'4, the largest quarterly shortfall on record, with the 12-month rolling total equal to 5.9% of the country's GDP. The RBA intervenes every month to sell Aussie dollars and slow its upside gains.

In the game of competitive currency devaluation with other central banks, the RBA has allowed its M3 money supply to expand at a 14.1% annualized rate, pumping up the local stock market but undermining confidence in the Treasury bond market. Aussie 10-year bond yields rose above the psychological 6% level in June, for the first time in five years.

In order to rein in the explosive growth of Aussie M3, the RBA would probably be required to hike its cash rate by 100 basis points to 7.25%, but that could send the Aussie dollar soaring into orbit against the Japanese yen, its top trading partner. Thus, the RBA's anti-inflation fighting capability is held hostage by the Bank of Japan, which won't lift its interest rates into alignment with the rest of the world.

Indirectly, the BoJ is exporting inflationary pressures into the Australian economy, with its super-low interest rate, and cheap yen policy. In turn, Aussie 10-year bond yields are rising faster than Japanese bond (JGB) yields, lifting the spread to +430 bp over JGB's, and catapulting the Aussie dollar to a 16-year high of 105-yen.

Japanese fixed income investors have become an integral part of the infamous "yen carry" trade, purchasing a large block of Australia's outstanding A$521 billion of foreign debt, seeking to profit from the yen's devaluation. But should the BoJ start to lift its interest rates to narrow the gap with the rest of the world, the carry trade could unwind, perhaps in a violent fashion.

The Bank for International Settlements pointed out on June 24th, that "there is clearly something anomalous in the ongoing decline in the external value of the yen. Tighter monetary policies would help to redress this situation, but the underlying problem seems to be a too firm conviction on the part of investors that the yen will not be allowed to strengthen in any significant way," the BIS said.

"If global trade imbalances need to be resolved, a further and perhaps substantial decline in the dollar might be part of the adjustment process," it warned, adding the yen could rise sharply once market sentiment shifts. But traders have heard these empty warnings for years, and the yen has stayed weak, in large part due to a gentleman's agreement between the US Treasury and Japan's ministry of finance.

BIS chief calls for Responsible Monetary Policies

Central bankers are playing a game of "Smoke and Mirrors" inching up interest rates at a snail's pace, but not high enough to curb explosive loan demand nor the growth of the money supply. But BIS General Manager Malcolm Knight is now calling on the world's top central bankers to slow down the printing presses, and allow borrowing rates to rise, to start draining the "Global Liquidity Glut," in earnest.

"Financial conditions are still accommodative, access to credit remains easy and credit spreads are at record lows. Containing inflationary pressures seems to require further tightening in most jurisdictions, as is expected by financial markets," he said.

"The credibility of central banks around the world may hinge on their response to surging money and credit growth, which is helping fuel asset bubbles. Some central banks need to ask soul-searching questions about the appropriate policy response. Ultimately, the credibility of central banks lies in the balance," Knight added.

Central banks in Australia, Canada, China, England, the Euro zone, Korea, South Africa, and Switzerland are expected to heed the call of the BIS chief, by lifting short-term rates a half-percent higher, albeit at a baby-step pace in the second half of 2007. Even the radical inflationist Bank of Japan is laying the groundwork for a long overdue quarter-point rate hike to 0.75% this summer.

"To stand pat on monetary policy for a long period of time is not a prudent strategy, since the acceleration of economic activity may in the future come to require a large adjustment in the policy rate, causing unnecessary swings in economic activity and prices," said BoJ member Kiyohiko Nishimura on July 3rd. But he added the BOJ must adjust rates slowly, "in line with economic and price developments."

The growing presence of Japanese retail investors in foreign bond markets has led to increased volatility in the foreign exchange market. "A sudden change in their behavior is likely to shift the direction and the magnitude of trading in foreign exchange markets, and heightens the risk of a sharp pull-back of "yen carry" trades that could destabilize financial markets," Nishimura warned.

FX market Expects an Easier Fed Policy in H'2 2007

One central bank that cannot contemplate higher interest rates however, is the Bernanke Fed, which is hamstrung by a sliding market for the weakest sector of the sub-prime mortgage loan market. The benchmark ABX 07-1 BBB index, which is tied to sub-prime mortgage loans, fell to 53.16 cents on the dollar, and has tumbled 43% since January. ABX's are sub-prime loan mortgages which are bundled in securities.

The fallout from the slide in sub-prime ABX's is uncertain, but if left unchecked, tighter lending standards could sink the US home building sector and housing prices, which were 2.7% lower, in May from a year earlier. Foreign currency traders are already upping their bets that the Bernanke Fed will continue its clandestine policy of injecting more US dollars into the banking system, and eventually lower the fed funds rate in a crisis situation. Coupled with the likelihood higher rates overseas, yet another global exodus from the US dollar has been set in motion.

In retrospect, it was Bernanke's infamous comments in a letter to California Rep Brad Sherman, dated Feb 15th, 2006 which began the dollar's latest 18-month descent. "A precipitous decline in the dollar, should not necessarily disrupt financial markets, production or employment," Bernanke wrote, portending the central bank's rapid increase in the growth rate of the US money supply.

Two months later, Russian finance chief Alexei Kudrin put the knife into the US dollar, by telling the IMF that Moscow could not consider the dollar as a reliable reserve currency because of its instability. "This currency has devalued by 40% against the Euro in recent years. The US dollar is not the world's absolute reserve currency. The unsustainable US trade deficit is causing concern and that the international community can hardly be satisfied with this instability," Kudrin told a stunned audience of the world's top central bankers in April 2006.

On November 24th, 2006, Chinese deputy central bank governor Wu Xiaoling warned "The exchange rate of the US dollar, which is the major reserve currency, is going lower, increasing the depreciation risk for east Asian reserve assets."

Russian Bear aligned with "Axis of Oil" meets President Bush

Russian kingpin Vladimir Putin has been a notorious bear on the US dollar for the past few years, and is a key member of the "Axis of Oil" including American foes Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Venezuela's Hugo Chavez. All three members of the "Axis of Oil" have been switching their FX reserves away from the US dollar and switching into Euros.

At a two-day meeting in Kennebunkport, Maine, Bush called Putin, "solid partner," and added that "Russia has made amazing progress in such a short period of time," since Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. "Russia is a country with no debt, and it's a significant international player. Is it perfect in the eyes of America? Not necessarily. Is the change real? Absolutely," Bush said. Putin responded by saying, "The deck's been dealt and we are here to play. I would very much hope that we are playing one and the same game."

At the core of their disputes however, is Putin's alignment with Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei, his support for Iran's nuclear program, and Moscow's opposition to further UN sanctions on Tehran, which could wreak havoc on Iran's economy. Putin also opposes Bush's plan to create a European-based missile-defense system with radar based in the Czech Republic and interceptors based in Poland.

Russia is the world's largest natural gas producer, and is second to Saudi Arabia as the world's top crude oil exporter. Rising oil prices have helped Russia amass foreign currency reserves of $405 billion, the third largest after China and Japan. Russia's economy expanded at a 7.7% annualized rate in the first five months of this year, while the US economy grew at only 0.7% in Q'1, or a tenth of Russia's performance.

On April 6th, 2007, Russian central bank chief Sergei Ignatyev said the approximate structure of Russia's foreign exchange reserves was 50% in US dollars, 40% Euros, and 10% in British pounds. Last year, Putin ordered payments for Russia's Ural oil exports in rubles, abandoning the US dollar as a medium of payment. Iran's Ahmadinejad has ordered payment for Iranian oil exports in Euros.

Higher oil prices would increase the wealth the "Axis of Oil" and the clout of the Arab Oil kingdoms in the Persian Gulf, which control an estimated $1.6 trillion of FX reserves, outstripping the Chinese dragon. One has to wonder what impact a possible military confrontation over Iran's nuclear weapons program would have on the foreign exchange market.

For additional commentaries and market analysis, consider a subscription to the Global Money Trends newsletter, published on Friday, for 44 issues per year!

Here's what you will receive with a subscription,

Out-of-the box analysis and predictions for the (1) top-10 stock markets around the world, Exchange Traded Funds, and US home-builder indexes (2) Commodities such as crude oil, copper, gold, silver, the DJ Commodity Index, and gold mining and oil company indexes (3) Foreign currencies such as, the Australian dollar, British pound, Euro, Japanese yen, and Canadian dollar (4) Libor interest rates, global bond markets and central bank monetary policies, (5) Central banker "Jawboning" and Intervention techniques that move markets.

GMT filters important news and information into (1) bullet-point, easy to understand analysis, (2) featuring "Inter-Market Technical Analysis" that visually displays the dynamic inter-relationships between foreign currencies, commodities, interest rates and the stock markets from a dozen key countries around the world. Also included are (3) charts of key economic statistics of foreign countries that move markets.

A subscription to Global Money Trends is offered at only $150 US dollars per year for "44 weekly issues", including access to all back issues. Click on the following hyperlink, to order now, http://www.sirchartsalot.com/newsletters.php Call toll free from USA to order, Sunday thru Thursday, 2 am to 4 pm EST, at 866-576-7872.



Gary Dorsch

http://www.sirchartsalot.com/

Mr Dorsch worked on the trading floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange for nine years as the chief Financial Futures Analyst for three clearing firms, Oppenheimer Rouse Futures Inc, GH Miller and Company, and a commodity fund at the LNS Financial Group.

As a transactional broker for Charles Schwab's Global Investment Services department, Mr Dorsch handled thousands of customer trades in 45 stock exchanges around the world, including Australia, Canada, Japan, Hong Kong, the Euro zone, London, Toronto, South Africa, Mexico, and New Zealand, and Canadian oil trusts, ADR's and Exchange Traded Funds.

He wrote a weekly newsletter from 2000 thru September 2005 called, "Foreign Currency Trends" for Charles Schwab's Global Investment department, featuring inter-market technical analysis, to understand the dynamic inter-relationships between the foreign exchange, global bond and stock markets, and key industrial commodities.

Disclaimer: SirChartsAlot.com's analysis and insights are based upon data gathered by it from various sources believed to be reliable, complete and accurate. However, no guarantee is made by SirChartsAlot.com as to the reliability, completeness and accuracy of the data so analyzed. SirChartsAlot.com is in the business of gathering information, analyzing it and disseminating the analysis for informational and educational purposes only. SirChartsAlot.com attempts to analyze trends, not make recommendations. All statements and expressions are the opinion of SirChartsAlot.com and are not meant to be investment advice or solicitation or recommendation to establish market positions. Our opinions are subject to change without notice. SirChartsAlot.com strongly advises readers to conduct thorough research relevant to decisions and verify facts from various independent sources.

Copyright © 2005-2007 SirChartsAlot, Inc. All rights reserved.

Labels:

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

Investing in Iraqi Oil - Dan Amoss

by Dan Amoss

Corruption Smothers Oil Industry in Iraq

Free markets are the lifeblood of a civilized society. But they are fragile. If they are to survive, contracts must be honored and property rights must be protected.

Beyond these basics, free markets work optimally when everyone follows the “Golden Rule” and treats everyone else as they’d like to be treated. Corruption -- including the use of political influence or violence to achieve results -- smothers free markets and the civilized societies they nourish. Once corruption gets out of control, everyone forgets about serving their fellow man and focuses their full attention on how they can game the system.

Sadly, corruption is a serious problem in Iraq -- a problem that started out as a way to “get things done” within the bureaucracy of Saddam Hussein’s gradually decaying dictatorship. Now it threatens the future economy and stability of the entire Middle East.

Pipeline Thefts and Violence Plague Northern Iraq

The giant Kirkuk oil field in the Kurdish region of northern Iraq has been fought over since it began producing oil over 70 years ago. The Baath government realized that control of Kirkuk was necessary to solidify its grip on the Iraqi oil industry, so in 1975, it initiated an “Arabization” program. Over the next few decades, Arabs from southern Iraq were incentivized by the government to displace ethnic Kurds in Kirkuk. Ever since the 2003 ouster of Saddam, the tables have turned, and the Kurds have fought for as much autonomy as they can get.

Yet despite the autonomy they’ve gained, the Kurdish leadership -- even with the help of the Iraqi government and the U.S. Army -- can’t ensure that Kirkuk’s crude oil gets shipped to market into reliable fashion.

The Wall Street Journal recently published a front-page story about uncontrollable pipeline siphoning in Iraq. The pipeline system delivering oil out of the Kirkuk region is too widespread to protect, so it’s an ideal target for a wide range of unsavory characters: “unruly desert tribes, bomb-planting insurgents, corrupt security forces, cross-border smugglers, and operators of small domestic refineries. At those refineries, U.S. officers believe, raw oil is turned into fuel and sold on the black market, where it’s used in vehicles and to power home generators. This loose confederation has all but crippled production in Iraq’s northern oil fields, even as the political future of this ethnically mixed city and its underground riches hangs in the balance.”

In the midst of this free-for-all, how can an Iraqi government that relies heavily on oil export revenues remain financially viable? The WSJ article continues:

“In the second half of [2006], one stretch of pipelines connecting Kirkuk with the Turkish Mediterranean port of Ceyhan -- the main outlet for Iraq’s northern oil exports -- pumped oil for only 43 days. The rest of the time, the pipes sat idle, leaking crude through dozens of holes drilled along their 200-mile run through the Iraqi desert. One pipeline has been broken into 39 times so far this year, according to U.S. military officials.

“The holes help explain why, four years after the U.S. invasion, Iraq hasn’t been able to match its prewar crude production levels of 2.5 million barrels a day. This year, Iraq is averaging 1.9 million barrels, mostly from southern oil fields that haven’t suffered the unrelenting sabotage seen in the north. Kirkuk currently produces 180,000 barrels of oil a day, but under normal conditions, it could produce an additional 400,000 barrels a day.”

Sectarian and tribal loyalties complicate the situation even further:

“The Northern Oil Co. has found itself at the center of the ethnic tensions. Of its 12,000 employees, only a few hundred are Kurds…

“Mr. Abdullah, the Northern Oil director, has been hiring Kurds, though he admits only 500 or so have come to work. Being an oil worker here has become increasingly dangerous. Pipeline repair crews have been hit by roadside bombs and shot at. Sunni insurgents have been dropping leaflets in Kirkuk telling all government employees, including oil company workers, to quit or face a bloodbath.

“Last summer, Adil al-Qazaz, Northern Oil's director-general at the time, went to Baghdad to visit the Oil Ministry. After his meeting, he was snatched by gunmen on the street, never to be seen again…

“Among the Iraqi security forces, the strategic infrastructure battalions have one of the strangest histories. In the aftermath of the U.S. invasion, Northern Oil tapped the Sunni Arab tribes to protect the pipelines running through their turf. Mr. Hussein used a similar system, mixing intimidation and rewards to secure cooperation of the tribal sheiks. After 2003, the oil company started direct payments to the sheiks, who would in turn distribute the money to the tribal guards. Essentially, the tribes were being paid to refrain from attacks on the pipeline.”

Despite the fact that southern Iraq hasn’t suffered the “unrelenting sabotage” occurring in the north, there’s little reason to expect a much better long-term outcome.

Smuggling and Iranian Control Plague Southern Iraq

Ghaith Abdul-Ahad, a journalist with the U.K. newspaper The Guardian, crafts very insightful articles from interviews that are clearly difficult and dangerous to get. In “Oiling the Wheels of War,” he takes us into the underworld of oil smuggling in Iraq:

“On the banks of the Shatt al-Arab in southern Iraq, a family business is thriving. For the Ashur, a small clan of about 50 families, it’s worth several million dollars a week. Costs are steep, especially for security. But profits are tidy and business is booming.

“The Ashur smuggle oil. For years under Saddam Hussein, they worked as mere guards at Abu Flus terminal at the mouth of the Gulf. But as the state collapsed after the U.S. and British invasion in 2003 and economic anarchy set in, they took over the port and became the quasi-official authority there. Never have the family’s fortunes flourished as in the last three years. They built their own underground oil tanks in their farms, where fuel tankers empty their cargoes to be pumped later into small pontoons. A cousin of the family estimates that they make about $5 million (£2.5 million) a week from smuggling oil.

“When another tribe tried to take over the ports, the family hired gunmen from outside Basra to defend its fiefdom. ‘We were paying $250,000 every week for gunmen just to make sure that we keep our terminals and preserve our rights,’ said the cousin, Abu Harith.

“The family operation is a dispiriting example of how large swaths of Iraq’s economy and mineral wealth have vanished into a legal vacuum, where the state is absent, law enforcement is nonexistent, and the spoils are shared by politicians, militias, and smuggler gangs.”

Groups like the Ashur clan seem as powerful as any organized crime ring in history. Militias fight over neighborhoods in oil-rich southern Iraq as fiercely as mafia elements defend their “turf.” Only their effect on society is even worse, because they control politicians and police officials. So the authorities wouldn’t want to do anything about this smuggling problem, even if they could. Abdul-Ahad provides a bit more color on a society that’s corrupt to the core:

“Oil is not the only industry steeped in corruption. Businessmen in Basra say anything connected to the state requires payments to militias and parties. In construction, for example, Abu Harith said: ‘There are two deals with parties and militia; one, they give you the contract for a price, but then you have to provide your own security; the other deal is that for a certain percentage of the contract, they will provide you with gunmen. No other militia will attack you.” In his last four contracts, he has paid $500,000 in bribes.

“But oil is the biggest racket of all in a country with the world’s second largest reserves. Oil worth millions is being smuggled out of southern Iraq every day and sold on the black market. The proceeds fund militias, mobsters, and corrupt politicians with cash that far outstrips the state’s financial resources.

“The smuggling also fuels factional fighting around Basra as each group tries to control its portion of the supply.

“One tanker captain, who is in his second decade of oil smuggling and owns his own ship, told The Guardian how lucrative the trade could be. ‘The big profits are to be made in crude oil,’ he said. ‘You rent an oil tanker, and after your first trip, you can buy the tanker.’

“The infrastructure of smuggling was set up under Saddam in the late 1990s, during the U.N. sanctions, when illegal oil shipments became the main method of getting cash into the country. Smuggling was an officially condoned policy…

“The captain, who specializes in crude smuggling, explained the process: ‘It depends on the officials manning the terminal when your tanker arrives. Usually it’s a committee of three-four; they are all of one [political] party. Your contact with that party arranges everything in advance.’

“Once the tanker is filled, another official usually arrives -- a surveyor hired by the government to inspect the cargo -- who is bribed to pass everything off as legitimate. The route of the tanker then differs, depending on its papers.

“The main risk is being stopped by patrolling U.S. or British vessels. ‘If I have official papers then all is fine, even if I am carrying twice the stated shipment,’ said the captain. ‘When I don’t have papers, we cross into Iranian waters, we carry an Iranian flag and bribe the Iranian coast guard. It’s a great business for them too. If we are arrested by the Iraqi navy, it’s easy. They are involved in the party, after all.’”

So every politician in southern Iraq has his hand in the till. We shouldn’t be surprised that the Iraqi parliament is making little progress in initiatives to secure the country. Most Iraqis are positioning for what they expect will be a violent land grab once the U.S. eventually withdraws its forces.

The violence in Baghdad may be getting all the press, but a far more significant development for global oil markets is Iran’s strengthening influence in Shia-dominated southern Iraq. In “Welcome to Tehran,” Abdul-Ahad’s interviews in Basra paint a picture of a critical port city now controlled by militias -- including several Iranian proxies. According to a senior Iraqi military intelligence official, “In Basra, Iran has more influence than the government in Baghdad…If a war happens, [the Iranians] can take over Basra without even sending their soldiers.”

Union Heritage of Iraq’s Oil Workers

Considering all the turmoil in the most oil-rich area of the world, it’s hard to argue that there shouldn’t be a geopolitical premium in the price of crude oil. The price of oil should embed an “insurance” component that fluctuates with the odds of a major supply disruption. To argue otherwise is to ignore the conditions under which most of the world’s oil is produced.

But the challenges facing future Iraqi oil production don’t end with corruption and sectarian violence. International oil companies with state-of-the-art technology have meager chances of gaining -- and holding -- concessions to produce Iraqi oil. Not only would they have to operate in the midst of warring militias, but they’d also have to go through the 26,000-member Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions.

In "Iraq Oil Union Has Storied Past", Ben Lando from United Press Intl. highlights the strong feelings Iraq’s oil workers have about the oil law under development:

“Hassan Jumaa Awad wants Iraq’s oil to stay under state control, and the unionists, who have long worked the rigs, to be supported in developing the national resource. But this is no request from the president of the Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions.

“It’s a demand.

“‘Since we are working to make progress in production, we need a real participation in all the laws that are related to the oil policy,’ Awad told United Press Intl., speaking on his mobile phone from the southern port city of Basra. ‘We are the sons of this sector and we have the management and technical capability and we have the knowledge on all the oil fields.’

“The IFOU represents more than 26,000 workers organized under various unions in the oil-rich southern and northern areas of Iraq. Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds, together they’ve operated Iraq’s oil sector before, during, and after Saddam Hussein. Their rights to officially unionize are still denied under a 1978 Saddam law, one of a few of the former president’s laws the U.S. occupation and the Iraqi Parliament upheld…

“Kurdish and central government negotiators reached a deal last month on the framework for a law governing Iraq’s oil. Details on ownership rights and revenue sharing are still far from finalized. The Iraq National Oil Co. would restart, but compete with foreign oil companies, who could win contracts giving them partial ownership of the respective fields.

“INOC ‘should have full privileges,’ Awad said, ‘and we don’t agree on the production partnership.’

“Iraq’s oil has been nationalized for four decades. Iraqis view it with a pride of ownership, something the law would reduce if the contract language allowing for foreign ownership stands.

“‘We think that to reserve sovereignty of Iraq is to be able to control the oil wealth,’ Awad said, and foreign investment should be limited to technical assistance. ‘I wish if the foreign companies were to come into Iraq, that they help us,’ Awad said. ‘Not to suck the blood of the Iraqi people.’

“The unions were kept in the dark, as were most members of Iraq’s parliament, until the draft law was leaked to the media. Even then, it was still out the reach of most of Iraq’s citizens…

“The IFOU could shut down Iraq’s production if the draft hydrocarbons law stands. With oil revenue funding 93% of the federal budget, that’s a large bargaining chip…”

Iraq’s oil industry will probably resemble Saudi Arabia’s in the future, with no foreign ownership of resources in the ground -- not good for those hoping for endless cheap supplies of oil from the Middle East.

And what exactly lies under the ground in Iraq?

Nobody knows for sure. But institutions like the Energy Information Administration and BP act as if they do. They publish OPEC reserve figures as if they were concrete facts.

So I’ll leave you with a set of figures from BP’s recently published Statistical Review of World Energy. I drew BP’s estimates of oil production in Iraq and Iran since 1965 into this chart:

I included dotted lines to draw your attention to the eight years in which the horribly destructive Iran-Iraq war occupied the full attention of the entire fighting-age generation. The war also consumed the economies of both countries. Production dropped dramatically and recovered very slowly.

Yet it’s an amazing coincidence that during this same time period, while fighting a war involving millions of soldiers, both Saddam Hussein and the Iranian mullahs had the resources and ability to conduct what appear to be massive oil exploration programs. At least that’s what you’d think looking at the chart of stated crude oil reserves below:

The real story behind these reserve numbers is that they are simply fudged out of necessity and likely overstate recoverable resources by a significant amount.

Sure, oil field technology developed in the 1980s allowed for the production of oil that would previously have been out of reach. But these reserve increases have more to do with OPEC production quotas than reality. In the 1980s, OPEC decided to tie production quotas to reserves. This created a huge incentive to overinflate reserves, especially for the cash-strapped Iraqis and Iranians desperate for oil revenues to fund their war.

We have every reason to question these figures. And we have every reason to expect that no matter how much oil lies under the ground in Iraq, it will be produced in an erratic, unreliable fashion.

Good investing,
Dan Amoss, CFA

For Whiskey and Gunpowder

Dan Amoss is managing editor of Strategic Investment, the highly respected US newsletter. Previously Dan worked at Investment Counselors of Maryland - investment advisors tor one of America's top small-cap value mutual funds over the past 15 years.

Labels: ,

Saturday, June 30, 2007

Inflation Begets Inflation - Fred Sheehan

by Fred Sheehan

Reaping the Whirlwind

The aspects of inflation are as varied as those of a diamond rotated in the sunlight. Each is illuminating, once one has the ability to distinguish between gemstones. To the untutored, higher oil prices cause inflation. This is similar to rotating a rhinestone, instead of a diamond. The connoisseur understands that too much money-cum-credit causes inflation.

The cost of energy is rising in dollars. Dollar production does not require exploration. The additional increment of energy is hard to find, difficult to evaluate, and susceptible to daily reevaluation upon further investigation (shale oil versus ethanol). Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke made the market call of the decade in 2002, when oil cost $25 a barrel: “Like gold, U.S. dollars have value only to the extent that they are strictly limited in supply. But the U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation…the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending, and, hence, positive inflation.”

Now to rotate the diamond. Bernanke did not address the printing presses in China, Russia, and Brazil. Americans spend more dollars buying goods shipped into the United States than foreigners pay for American goods that are sold abroad. The result is a mountain of dollars piling up in foreign countries. These extra dollars flow into those local economies. This causes an acceleration of production and consumption -- inflation. An example might be posed as a question: If Americans had spent a trillion dollars less on goods from China et al. over the past decade, would China now be a net importer of coal or India a net importer of grains? China would probably not be increasing its consumption of beef by 20% a year. The base off of which that growth rate is compounding would certainly be at a much lower level.

This elevated base and rate of consumption has accelerated at a much faster pace than the ability to ship and produce the structural material. For instance, one half of urban homes in China now own air conditioners; the power grid cannot compete with such indulgences.

The situation is a bit like the wedding feast at Cana. The caterer badly underestimated the amount of wine required to lubricate the happy glands and bonhomie of the gathered guests. The guests’ teeth were grinding to a halt. It was at this moment that Jesus arrived and produced wine for the multitudes.

We might pray for a miracle, but among other considerations, there is little money to be made from an instant solution. The early stages of discovery are chock-full of moneymaking (and capital-destroying) opportunities. Energy, dollar, and physical construction are inseparable from global hyperactivity.

An integrated specimen is the worldwide housing boom, any component of which involves energy. This pushes energy prices north. A facet of the integration: Russian housing starts have risen 70% over the past year. Russian central bank holdings of U.S. dollars have increased 50% over the past year. The two growth rates are very much related: The Russian central bank converts U.S. dollars received for Russian oil that was exported to the United States. In converting, the central bank prints rubles in exchange for the dollars. These rubles -- that had not and would not exist if not for American energy demands -- then make their way into the Russian economy. Real estate developers are mighty pleased.

We can turn the diamond slightly and see how higher energy costs have increased prices for milk and tortillas. The U.S. government’s solution to limited oil resources includes a vast commitment to ethanol. According to the game plan, the energy used to run cars will, in effect, replace gasoline with corn. The effort may be flawed, but government subsidies, once in motion, rarely come to a screeching halt.

The U.S. produces 11 billion bushels of corn a year. In 2005, 1.5 billion bushels were sequestered for ethanol production. This leapt to 2.3 billion bushels in 2006 and an estimated 3.3 billion bushels in 2007. The price of corn has risen. The Mexican diet is heavily tortilla-ized, especially at the lower income stratum. Riots scarred the early months of President Felipe Calderon’s term of office. He slapped price controls on tortillas. Borrowing from the book of Castro, Calderon warned, “We won’t tolerate monopolists and speculators.” His Cuban counterpart made more sense when he declaimed the “sinister idea of converting food into fuel.”

The little man is also exposed in the United States. Farmland and grazing land are being rotated to the highest-priced crop. Cows are no longer fashionable. Thus, domestic milk prices have risen 63% over the past year. According to Andy Lees at UBS in London, world milk prices have risen 60% over the past six months (measured by the price of skim milk powder, commonly used as the benchmark). The U.S. has no surplus milk powder. It had 2.7 billion pounds in storage in 1983; the last 27 million pounds were sold last year. European warehouses are empty. Other food prices are rising by double digits. (Most everyone knows the government trumpets a consumer price index that does not include food and energy. Less well known is the absence of commodities such as milk, eggs, butter, and cheese from the seasonally adjusted CPI number that does -- purportedly -- include food and energy.)

The pace of energy production required to catch up with energy demands leads to possibly regrettable decisions. Again, from Andy Lees: “Growing plants for fuel will accelerate the already unacceptable levels of topsoil erosion. By using crops for biofuels, we would effectively be ‘mining’ the topsoil, and there is only about six inches of this around the world, on average. Even the best places in North America have seen the topsoil erode from 18 to 10 inches over the past 50 years, but it would have been dramatically more had it not been for replacing it with fertilizer (fossil fuel based)…Fertilizers provide 28% of the energy crops need…” Topsoil erosion due to topsoil mining reduces yield levels. Thus, more fertilizer is needed at the cost of ever more energy just to remain static.
The production of fertilizers consumes energy. Since the cost of energy is rising, the cost of fertilizer production follows. PotashCorp of Canada thinks the cost of producing potash fertilizer in Brazil will rise by nearly 70% this year, due to increased demand for food and fuel. The ethanol binge thus consumes more energy in an effort to produce more energy. The cost of farming is rising, as is the cost of buying a farm: Over the past year, farm prices have risen 10% in Australia and 15% in the U.S.

Unintended consequences surround us. Cambridge Energy Research Associates estimates the worldwide cost to produce oil and natural gas (labor and equipment) has risen 53% since 2004. In some cases, the rising costs have led producers to scrap exploration. Exxon estimated the cost of building a gas-to-liquids plant in Qatar at $3 billion in 2004. Current estimates have risen to $18 billion. The joint project of Exxon and Qatar has been dropped. This foregone production is an aspect of higher energy costs that is invisible, so not widely appreciated. The increased energy, labor, and materials costs of mining have postponed or eliminated many projects. Copper production is no higher than a year ago, despite rising prices. Those staring into the rhinestone declare, “Higher prices increase production, which will reduce the price.” Yes, but at what price is it worth exploring?

It is not only the investment, but also diminished profits that cause exploration to lag. Profits of South African gold miners have suffered because the cost of the miners’ diet -- heavily weighted toward beef -- has risen. Beef prices have risen (around the world) as grazing land is turned into ethanol incubators (corn, sugar, palm oil, and so on).

Ethanol cannot be transported through pipelines (the water and chemicals prevent it); trucking is expensive, so the most economic solution is railroad transportation. Rails are constructed from steel. Steel prices are rising as demand increases. The metals used to construct steel are not mined fast enough. Skyscrapers are constructed from steel. Economist David Hale calculates that between 1900-1970, when America’s urban population increased from 30 million to 154 million, per capita steel consumption rose 600%. The current Chinese migration to the cities has received wide publicity, but the trek to the cities -- and apartment buildings -- is global.

Nickel is an essential ingredient of stainless steel. Stainless steel is essential to marine construction (which is at a record book order). Nickel has risen from $7 a pound in early 2006 to over $20 a pound. Besides nickel, the other key ingredient, ferrochrome, has been rising in price since the beginning of the year. Posco, the Korean steel manufacturer, is “emphasizing” nickel-free, ferritic stainless steel. Sean Corrigan of Diapason Commodities Management describes one of the inevitable consequences of inflation: “One can’t help feeling that sometime in the next decade an awful lot of bottoms are going to fall out of ships that were…built in Guangzhou and Shanghai…”

Steel craves iron ore. A much-traveled route is from Australian iron ore mines to Chinese steel plants. Ships now wait 30 days at Australian coal and iron ore terminals. Iron ore producers must pay for the ships to sit. The queue is caused by Australian rail deficiencies. In Andy Lees’ estimation, “This bottleneck is likely to last for several years.” Thus, iron ore needs to be mined at a faster pace to build the tracks to more economically export the iron ore. New railroad track is delayed by another bottleneck in most every locale associated with frantic digging and drilling: The Australian jobless rate is the lowest in 31 years.

All producers and consumers pay more, since idle ships reduce those available at any one time. Hence, Baltic freight rates for bulk carriers have more than doubled in 2007. Brazil is the most efficient soybean producer in the world, but shipping costs (to Asia) are pricing the Brazilian crop out of the market. (The fact that China is importing soybeans from South America also shrinks the number of available ships available for world cargo trade. China has recently become a net importer of coal for the first time. This adds pressure to shipping, steel, and iron ore prices.)

All of this activity means energy discovery and production works harder just to stay in place. Consider: The China trade into Los Angeles and Long Beach exceeds capacity -- ships are rerouted to Mexico and Canada, while trucks carry freight 60 miles east to San Bernardino, where a warehouse the size of eight Manhattan blocks is being built. In a three-day period, port expansions were announced in Dalian (China’s largest crude oil terminal), DP World’s port in Dubai (a 67% expansion), and Qinhuangdao (China’s largest coal port). China plans to build 25,000 miles of rail track by 2010 “in an effort to ease bottlenecks in the transport of everything from coal to soybeans to people”; 86 subway systems are under construction in Chinese cities; 85 biodiesel plants are under construction in the U.S. Gas rigs in the U.S. rose from 17,000 in 2000 to 28,000 wells in 2005, yet produced 5% less gas. The Ghawar oil field in Saudi Arabia employs 8,700 wells -- from 800 in 1978. The May 25 issue of Compass Maritime Services’ Weekly Market Report could barely control its excitement: “Newbuilding prices [for ships] are also firming as 2010 berths are disappearing and it was reported that 70 [bulk carriers] were ordered this week!...Shipbuilding capital markets remain hot, hot, hot, as close to $2 billion in capital was raised in the past month.”

We’ll finish by dropping the diamond on the floor to see the world through Bernanke’s myopic view -- that is, from the United States, which is all he is permitted to consider. The amount of steel for apartment construction in Shanghai and Istanbul or the growing appetite for power and power plants around the world escapes his blinders. (Iran’s power plants cannot keep pace with demand; a good part of the increment is produced by consumer electronics imported from China.)

Forget about SUVs. The Toll Brothers (both of them), who manufacture the highest-cost houses in the U.S. (average price for new sale is $675,000 -- and falling), note that buyers opted for ceilings of eight feet in the 1980s. Then it was nine feet and now it is 10 feet. The basic house includes optional equipment. Toll house buyers are drawn to visual trinkets on the facade (e.g., Ionic columns in front of the doghouse), rather than additional insulation. The best-selling box is now “the Hampton,” a 4,800 square-foot pile. The best-seller five years ago was 4,000 square feet. These figures do not reflect the additional two feet of air to be heated and air-conditioned. Nationally -- with or without the Toll Brothers -- the fastest-growing house configuration between 1990-2005 was the five- (or more) bedroom model.

Energy output needs to work hard to keep up with such production, but even the Hampton falls short of rising consumption. Houses are bursting at the seams: The amount of self-storage used by Americans has grown 50% since 1995. There are now 1.89 billion square feet of self-storage space -- six square feet for every man, woman, and child. Much of it is climate controlled.

Many of the fastest-growing real estate markets are full of hot air (California, Las Vegas, Arizona, Florida) or cold air (New England to Washington). The Phoenix-Scottsdale, Ariz., population has risen from 2 million in 1990 to 4 million. Landowners and developers have staked out a rough plan for 8 million sun seekers in 2016. (The betting here is they will be sorely disappointed.) On hot days now, Phoenix uses more energy than New York City. SUVs can be traded for a Cooper; house consumption is here to stay (or rot). Looking abroad, the United Arab Emirates, now rolling in $850 billion of foreign currency reserves, will not be quick to delay construction of new aluminum plants, fertilizer plants, or refineries, not to mention Dubai’s 25-story, air-conditioned ski slope inside a glass bubble.

Naysayers will identify the ski slope as the ultimate bubble. They will also note the weak straw is of centrifugal dollar claims turning centripetal. Fair enough. However, there is probably less than $1 invested in commodities (inventory, common stocks, derivatives) for every $100 of claims on fancy derivatives. Some unfortunate investors are finding the world is not interested in buying CDOs supported by shrinking asset values, but the world needs another 10 million tons of fertilizer -- now.

Regards,
Fred Sheehan
Fred Sheehan is columnist and economist with Marc Faber's Gloom, Doom and Boom Report.

Labels: ,

The Global Strategy of the Russian-Iran Cabal - David Jonsson

David J. Jonsson
June 29, 2007

If you believe: “Your Life Can Be Wonderful if we get out of Iraq now!” the events going on around the world become a haze as you watch the latest golf scores or read the propaganda for the latest appeasement journal or cable news cast.

All you hear are the speeches of the latest ‘Tokyo Rose” complaining about the U.S. and its war mongering, blood for oil or unfair treatment of terrorists.

There is a group that wants to destroy our way of life in our life time.

The Tough Questions that Must be Answered

The question remains as to if the allies joined for freedom and liberty will support a battle against the forces of evil.

In a time of war, the critical elements for success are to know:

Who is the enemy?

What are their goals?

What is the definition of success, and finally

What will the world be like if we lose?

Up to the time of the Munich Agreement in 1938, these questions were not answered. The West faces the same situation following the cease-fire in Lebanon in 2006. The West must decide on the answers to the questions or be prepared to live under Shariah Law in a totalitarian Islamic state. The question that has to be answered is: Would you choose appeasement and wind up as a lampshade in a palace or fight for Western democracy, freedom and liberty?

On our comprehensively terrorised globe, almost everybody, from covert, stateless bands of Jihadists—Hezbollah, Hamas and al-Qaeda to name a few to accredited members of the United Nations, believes himself in need of either ready-made atomic bombs or the technology and expertise with which to manufacture them. And nuclear weapons have become the weapons of the poor. Terrorism as a means of warfare is not confined to so-called non-state actors like Mohamed Atta and his colleagues, but is habitually employed by nation states.

International Affairs Is A Zero Sum Game.

When power is withdrawn by one state, another state or group will fill that power vacuum. History has proven this in the past. When British hegemony declined, American power filled that gap in the western world. Communism similarly filled power vacuums left after America’s withdrawal from Vietnam. President Jimmy Carter’s defense spending cuts diminished American influence in Africa, South America, and Asia. I might add Carter continues to support anti-Semitic rhetoric, Iran and Hamas.

The same rules of international affairs hold true today. Should America withdraw from Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, that power vacuum will be filled by some state or group.

In the Middle East, it is clear that Iran is filling power vacuums that the Iraqi government has not filled when authority was handed to it by the US military, and similarly in Lebanon, Gaza, and Afghanistan where there is weak political leadership.

Iran has further expanded its power through its allies and affiliated organizations in Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, and Afghanistan. Iran along with its allies and sponsors will continue to do so until they are countered with force or by a competing political influence.

The Appeasement of the West

Decades from now, historians will discover that the United States, the West and the international community were being targeted by global ideologi­cal movements which emerged in the 1920s, survived World War II and the Cold War, and carefully chose this timing for its onslaught against democracy.

Whether it realizes this or not, America is facing a kind of liberal-Islamic alliance: a sympathetic relationship that leading leftists in America have with Islamic radicals around the world. I’m not suggesting the two groups actually like each other. Actually, they despise each other. Leftists like Pelosi, Barney Frank and Michael Moore despise bin Laden and his fellow radicals because they are religious fundamentalists who want to impose Islamic [Shariah] holy law. That means goodbye to freedom of religion, women’s rights and gay rights and, in all candor, goodbye to people like Pelosi, Frank and Moore. By the same token, Islamic radicals like bin Laden detest the American left because, as they see it, the left is the party of atheism, family breakdown and cultural depravity. The left is in the vanguard of imposing secularism and libertine social values in America and the EU.

The West’s Fatal bugs in the Software

If one looks at the military strength of the West compared to Iran, victory would seem to be inevitable, even if Iran acquires nuclear weapons. Iran does not have the military machine that the Axis powers had in World War II, nor the Soviet Union during the cold war. The Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance may be more effective than the earlier totalitarian movements operating individually. They could even win. That’s because, however strong the Western hardware, its software contains some potentially fatal bugs. Three of them – pacifism, self-hatred, and complacency combined with the Oil Weapon could provide the needed weapons to succeed.

Many on the American Left loathe America—while they love the Constitution and their vision of what America could be but they have contempt for the average American. That is why most of the Left speaks of America as bringing immeasurable misery and sadness to the world and as essentially deserving attacks on it.

Ditching the “War on Terror”

Politicians in the US and Europe are ditching the “War on Terror”, however this is probably not the big news. The “War on Terror” will probably not survive the next Republican Administration, let alone the next Democratic one.

The real news is that little or no attention is paid to the Russia, China and India. While attention is directed to the Middle East, there is little attention to the rising great powers.

Among the Democrats, their foreign policy proposes that the major rising powers are no threat at all. It's no surprise that Edwards and Obama want to boost foreign aid. They believe the poor world threatens the U.S. more than the rich. Mitt Romney and John Edwards have proposed a new type Marshall Plan. The real danger, they argue, is from states that are too dysfunctional to educate their people, provide public health or control their territory—thus export a swarm of pathologies, from jihadist terrorism to lose nukes to even bird flu. Their answer is a foreign policy hence directed to social programs, and even a new “Marshall Plan” and flinch at the hard nosed calculations of survival of the West.

Social programs in dysfunctional states will not remove the threats to our democracy, liberty and freedom, How the US handles the treats from these totalitarian major powers and the their surrogate pawns of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, etc. will determine how dangerous the world becomes in the coming years and whether the US remains its lone superpower.

The Gulf states have passed China!” “Six Persian Gulf States now have almost $1.6 trillion in foreign assets, dwarfing even China’s mammoth $1.1 trillion of foreign reserves, according to a new report from the Institute of International Finance” according to the Financial Times.

These Gulf States are all members of the so-called Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). They are Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

There are massive piles of wealth growing in the GCC.” “Along with China and other countries, the GCC is increasingly setting aside more and more of these funds to invest abroad -- in stocks, real estate and private businesses. What they buy could have a huge impact on market prices -- and your investments.” See also my article: Nationalization: A Plan for World Domination?

It appears strange that politicians would suggest that the US fund a Marshall Plan to support the Islamic countries when the Islamic Countries of the Gulf are accumulating hordes of US dollars. It is in the Islamic countries that we are seeing the growth of terrorism.

We will discuss how these elements are directly interrelated and suggest potential solutions for consideration.

The Apocalyptic Teaching of Islam

Islam has many apocalyptic prophecies; this aspect of Islam contributes to the driving force and power of Islam. See also my article: Iraq, Iran, Global Warming and The Apocalypse.

Iran joined by Syria wants to end the democratic experiment in Iraq. Iranian money, weapons and expertise are used by terrorists to kill Americans in Iraq. Iran’s support of Hamas disrupts Palestinian peace efforts. Hezbollah, a group also backed by Iran and Syria, seeks to destabilize Lebanese democracy and restart a border war with Israel. Iran which denies that a European Holocaust ever took place is now planning to create a second Holocaust in Europe and in the U.S. with the development of nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver the weapons.

Only the sustained American policy of ostracizing Iran and Syria and their alliance partners and sponsors, galvanizing the international community to enforce financial and trading sanctions, supporting Iranian and Syrian reformers, and keeping all options for war on the table including a high-profile presence in the area offers any hope containing a potential holocaust.

Exclusively increasing military strength, diplomacy or withdrawing from Iraq will not defer or result in a lasting peace. Whatever way the Iran and Iraq crisis is resolved, it will lead to a major shift in the geopolitical landscape. The goal is to have a soft landing.

This will require sacrifice, compromise but not appeasement, and most importantly prioritizing the most important elements of our culture – faith, freedom, liberty, and democracy, as we know it in America.

Decision time is fast approaching. Unfortunately both Iran and the U.S. may be underestimating the power of the other side and overestimating their own. Iran thinks it has a lot of deterrents, in Iraq and elsewhere, and in the armed forces - and it sees the US bogged down in Iraq, Washington is divided and public opinion in the Western world—led by the propaganda of Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance is opposed to war.

Similarity to Events Preceding World War II

One cannot help but recognize the similarity between the events leading up to World War ll and the current events.



With every passing year following the events of 9/11 the rise of Leftist/Marxist-Islamist Alliance has increased global instability. By the beginning of 2006, nearly all the combustible ingredients–far bigger in scale than those leading to World Wars 1 and 11 and the Gulf Wars of 1991 or 2003–were in place.”

Remember Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has a plan just like the Nazi’s “Four Year Plan“, he is a scholar of history, and he also is a follower of the Qur’an.

“Iran is no different than Nazi Germany”, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) source said. “They too built up an army, resources and created the V-2.” The V-2 was the first man-made object launched into space, during test flights that reached an altitude of 189 km (117 miles) in 1944. “While Germany was putting the finishing touches to the V-2 which was eventually used against Britain, the world stood by wanting to talk. Now we have Iran repeating history, declaring to “wipe Israel off the map” while planting bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan”

“Iran which denies that a European Holocaust ever took place, is now planning to create a second Holocaust in Europe and in the US,” said the Israel MFA source. “Europe will be first to feel this nuclear suicide bomb, as London, Moscow, Madrid, Rome and Paris are now in range of Iranian missiles. We no longer have the luxury of time to implement sanctions. This is not a movie. This is not the “24” TV series about nuclear terrorism. This is real. Sanctions worked against North Korea, they can and will work against Iran.”

Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu on November 13, 2006 drew a direct analogy between Iran and Nazi Germany.


It’s 1938 and Iran is Germany. And Iran is racing to arm itself with atomic bombs,” Netanyahu told delegates to the annual United Jewish Communities General Assembly, repeating the line several times, like a chorus, during his address. “Believe him and stop him,” the opposition leader said of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. “This is what we must do. Everything else pales before this.”

While Iran is developing WMD and forming alliances throughout the world including Cuba just 90 miles off the coast of America, Russia and China are providing arms for the alliance and equally important Russia is finalizing the energy noose around Europe. The Islamists along with their Leftist/Marxist alliance partners meanwhile are quietly assuming key positions in the governments, the media and even financial institutions.

Failure to Understand Muslim Culture

There is a failure to understand the Muslim Culture. After September 11, Bush explained that the attacks showed that the friend of your enemy is also your enemy. As he put it last September, “America makes no distinction between those who commit acts of terror, and those that harbor and support them, because they’re equally guilty of murder.”

Bush failed to note the converse of that reality: the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend and allay. Here the distinction generally relates to Sunnis and Shiites. We fail to grasp that just because Shiites and Sunnis are rivals don’t mean that they will join forces with the U.S. to fight one another, or won’t join forces with one another to fight the U.S. to accomplish their goal of establishing the Islamic kingdom of God and the return of the caliphate. This and the failure to recognize the goals of Russia and China have and will continue to cause the Americans no end of difficulty. We also fail to recognize that these forces have also joined with the Leftists abroad and with in us.

There is an Arab saying to the effect that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” While this may be the standard for many countries in the Middle East, it is not the standard by which a democratic nation like the United States can afford to operate.

Equally important is to recognize that Russia and China are also linked with mutual interests – world domination and that Russia is neither the friend of the EU or the U.S.

Unfortunately, these forces have combined into the alliance of the Leftist/Marxist and Islamists – with the common goal of world domination.

Why do Islamists Hate America? That is Wrong Question

Many propagandists of the Leftist/Marxist – Islamist Alliance are using all efforts to attempt to question why the Islamist hates America. While it is true that the hedonistic life style of the Leftists runs counter to the Shariah law, many Leftists are drawn into the support of the Islamist movement. It should also be noted that Bible believing Christians and Jews do not support the hedonistic life style of the Leftists.

Counter to the question of “Why do they hate us?” one has to ask the question:

What is the goal of Islam?”

Islam, from its very beginning, and the teaching of Muhammad was and is to create the Islamic kingdom of God on Earth. Their desire for this kingdom is to be a kingdom ruled by a caliph under Shariah law where all non-believers—infidels—are subservient to Muslims. It has been said by many apologists for Islam, that Christians and Jews lived together peacefully under Islamic rule for 500 years. This was true, but only as dhimmis living in servitude to Islamic rule. The Islamists and their Leftist propagandists wish to have us believe this is the way to peace.

The Jihadists drive to instill Shariah Law—Islamic law into Muslim society, and ultimately recreate that society under their interpretation of the law, which often translates into an endorsement for violent jihad as practiced by bin Laden, and espoused by the Muslim Brotherhood and others.

Ideology is often overlooked and is considered separate from the strategic and operational aspects of Islamist militancy. The ideology of this movement is similar to, or even worse than, the Nazi ideology, and it should be dealt accordingly.

Therefore, I still believe that one of the primary missions of the international community today is to repeat its experience with Nazism and to deal with this dangerous barbarian culture exactly as it dealt with the Nazi culture. If this does not happen, the near future is liable to bring many events, the consequences of which will be far more severe for all of humanity than the consequences of World War II.

The Disturbing Recent Events

The Fall of the Gaza Strip - “Hamastan”and “Fatahland”

The Hamas victory in Gaza is a warning that the West is currently losing that war.

The real force behind the Gaza mayhem seems to be, a combined al Qaeda and Iran strategy, strange bedfellows perhaps, but for the time being, closely-linked partners in a common strategic goal to establish "Hamastan" as a forward base for Global terrorism. Al Qaeda's ultimate objective is to destabilize and destroy the moderate Arab nations, first in line post- Mubaraq's Egypt, then the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and finally, the Sunni cradle of Saudi Arabia. A similar aim is Tehran's Shiite Crescent strategy - thus both partners are united, even if their spiritual heritance differs widely and even conflicts sharply, in their religious deism. See also my article: Caliphatism - Establishing the "Islamic Kingdom of God on Earth".

It should be noted that The Fatah-Hamas differences concern personnel, approaches, and tactics. They share allies and goals. Tehran arms both Hamas and Fatah.

The “moderate” terrorists of Fatah and the bad terrorists of Hamas equally indoctrinate children with a barbaric creed of “martyrdom.” Both agree on eliminating the Jewish state. Neither shows a map with Israel present, or even Tel Aviv.

The Gaza Strip is now firmly in the control of Hamas, a radical terrorist group funded by Iran and Syria. Some have called Gaza “Hamastan”, expecting that the area will become an Islamic quasi-state akin to Iran where Shariah law is strictly enforced. The fear is that Gaza will become a Lebanon-like Hamastan, a wasps’ nest that in the future will attract al-Qaeda men and extensions of Iran. All of these things are coming to life before our very eyes.

The Financial Times in the article of June 19: Missed opportunities, Gaza and the spread of jihadism—“Splinter groups linked to al-Qaeda are already emerging in Gaza. Some Israelis are fretting that they have a new Somalia or Afghanistan on their border.

Hamas in Gaza is also allied with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.” See also: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance.

While on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Washington is putting on a brave face over the Palestinian rift, with talk among the diplomatic community of “silver linings” and “windows of opportunity”.

An international response to these woeful events is now coming into view. But the path signaled by the US and Europe looks dangerously close to an attempt to micromanage and to pick sides in an internal Palestinian dispute. More importantly the US and the EU fail to understand that the reality in the Arab world is: the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend and allay.

Behind the new international consensus is the goal of making the West Bank an exemplar of the benefits of co-operating with the west and renouncing terrorism. There is also a desire to limit contacts with Gaza to providing humanitarian aid and ensuring that essential staff are not left destitute. The champions of this approach are the US and Israel, but, as the biggest donor to the Palestinians, the EU also matters.

Alarmingly, countries such as the UK and France now seem to be scaling back their earlier insistence that Mr. Abbas’s new government be as inclusive as possible. But reconciliation is crucial. The EU and the west must send the strongest possible message that Fatah should not take advantage of the new situation to settle old scores with Hamas on the West Bank.

US and Israeli Positions on Palestine Grounded in Fantasy

Both the US and Israel may have a strategic vision for the future of Abbas’s Palestine, but it is grounded in fantasy. US President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will gush about their support for Palestinian statehood. Bush and Olmert announced their full support for Fatah chief and Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s new government. Israel will give Fatah $700 million. The Europeans and the rest of the international community will give the “moderate, secular” terror group still more money and guns and love. The US will likely also demand that Olmert order the IDF to give Fatah terrorists free reign in Judea and Samaria. See: Yadlin Warns What Happened In Gaza Will Happen in Judea, Samaria.

They fail to realize that Israel now borders Iran in Lebanon and Gaza. And Fatah is also supported by Iran. This is truly a dangerous game played out in the name of appeasement.

The Muslim Brotherhood in America

It should be noted here that The Chicago Tribune, Sept. 19, 2004 in A rare look at secretive Brotherhood in America by Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah, Sam Roe, and Laurie Cohen reported that “Brotherhood members helped form The Islamic Society of North America, the umbrella group for the Muslim Youth of North America and the Muslim Students Association, but that their overall influence has been limited.”

“The Groups that the Brotherhood helped form printed Islamic books, many of which were distributed at mosques and on college campuses. They included Sayyid Qutb's "In the Shade of the Koran" and "Milestones," which urges jihad, martyrdom and the creation of Islamic states. Scholars came to view his writings as manifestos for Islamic militants.”

“In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society (MAS), according to documents and interviews. One of the nation's major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members.”

On August 12, 2006 protest marches were organized by the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition in numerous cities across America. The marches were announced at: August 12 National March to Stop the U.S.-Israeli War. Hundreds of organizations from around the country have endorsed and pledged to mobilize for the August 12 demonstration which was initiated by the ANSWER Coalition (Act Now to Stop War & End Racism), the National Council of Arab Americans (NCA) and the Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation.

Photos taken at the "Stop the US Israeli War rally San Francisco" <> rally in San Francisco on August 12, 2006 show masked protesters with a Hamas flag and a Palestinian flag and the Hamas flag in front of San Francisco's City Hall. It was one of several similar rallies held around the country on the same day.

Jihadist Movements Growing Worldwide

The north of Lebanon has seen fighting provoked by the rise of Fatah al-Islam, which is inspired by al-Qaeda. Jihadist movements are also growing in strength in the Kurdish areas of Iraq and Turkey, in Jordan, Yemen, and Egypt and across North Africa. Even south-east Asian countries - despite rapid economic growth - now have serious problems. Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines all have active and violent Islamist movements.

Above all, Iraq is serving as an inspiration and training ground for a new generation of jihadists - just as the Afghan war against the Soviet Union once did. Terrorist techniques perfected in Iraq are cropping up elsewhere. Suicide bombing was unknown in Afghanistan until a couple of years ago. Now it is a deadly, almost daily occurrence.

A familiar refrain - particularly in Europe - is that the key to soothing Islamist militancy lies in “solving” the Palestinian problem. There are obvious holes that can be picked in this argument.

Hamas is not interested in negotiating with Israel to create a Palestinian State. Hamas wants Israel to be eliminated. And further Hamas wants to create the new caliphate, a new world order ruled by Islamists.

Osama bin Laden has never shown much interest in a two-state solution. The attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned when the Middle East peace process was in relatively good shape. Al-Qaeda’s demands are so unrealistic - and its narrative of grievance so selective - that it will not be swayed by any changes in western policy.

With Hamas now in the control of Gaza and both Hamas and Fatah armed by Tehran, combined with Iranian-backed Hezbollah’s influence in Lebanon, it furthers the move of Iran for control of the Mediterranean. Add to this the building of Russia building military ports in Syria and providing arms to Syria further demonstrates the power of the alliance.

As reported by David Eshel for Defense Update on December 23, 2006: “In fact, as had been revealed recently, Russia, Iran and Syria have already entered a defense pact aiming at Moscow's ambitions to the process of altering the balance of power in the entire Middle East. Russia’s own part in this pact has been kept relatively secret for a long time.”

The appearance of Russian ships in Tartus [Syria] will signal a dramatic reinforcement of Russia’s naval potential in the NATO dominated Mediterranean Sea, even when compared to the cold war period.”

The Democrat Controlled Congress Seeks to Break up Iraq

Both Rep. Ellen Tauscher of Walnut Creek and her California colleague and fellow Democrat, Sen. Barbara Boxer want the United States to admit that the idea of a strong national government in Iraq won’t work and instead aim to set up a federal system in which Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds can separate, cool the sectarian killings and manage their own affairs. Her proposal, which she calls the Change the Course in Iraq Act, is going places in Congress because it has acquired a most-powerful patron, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco. The speaker has written Tauscher a letter expressing support and pledging a vote on the legislation at some point in the next few months.

If they are successful in breaking up Iraq, as would be expected, the Southern part of Iraq is controlled fully by Iran; this gives a full and complete access for Iran to the Mediterranean and the creation of the Shiite Crescent.

Turkey’s Move to Join the Middle East and away from the EU

In considering relations with Turkey, the West must remember that the enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend and allay. In a departure from its traditional foreign policy which has gone largely unnoticed, Turkey is now becoming an important player in the Middle East. See: Turkey Rediscovers the Middle East, Foreign Affairs July/August 2007 and The city where Turkey’s republic lost its way, Financial Times June 26, 2007

Turkey’s growing concern over Kurdish nationalism has brought Ankara closer to the governments of Iran and Syria, which also contend with restive Kurds at home.

The shift is also accompanied by the gradual Islamization of the country led by the ruling Islamist Justice and Development Party (known as the AKP), headed by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has managed to tap into rising popular nationalism by fusing it with Islam.

Some 60 percent of all U.S. military equipment destined for Iraq goes through the territory or airspace of Turkey, a Muslim ally and member of NATO.

If this route to Iraq were restricted or closed entirely, the ability of the United States to effectively combat the insurgency and violent militias in Iraq would be impaired. The Erdogan government could also come under domestic pressure to restrict U.S. use of the air base at Incirlik in southern Turkey to re-supply American troops in Afghanistan. Should it be necessary to take military action against Iran or even Russia, the availability of bases in Turkey is critical.

In addition Turkey controls access to the Bosporus Strait an oil choke point for oil supply to Europe. Energy is a major driver behind the warming of Iranian-Turkish relations. Iran is the second-largest supplier of natural gas to Turkey (after Russia).

Iran’s nuclear ambitions, however, are a source of serious concern in Ankara. A nuclear-armed Iran could have a destabilizing impact on the Persian Gulf region and force Turkey to take countermeasures for its own security.

If Iran refuses to comply with the demands of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ankara will have essentially three options: expand its cooperation on missile defense with the United States and Israel; beef up its conventional military capabilities, especially medium-range missiles; or develop its own nuclear weapons capability.

The Required Missile Defense against Iran in Central Europe

Iran’s push for nuclear weapons is accompanied by its development of ICBMs. The threat of a nuclear armed Iran is no longer just a problem for Israel and their Arab neighbors. Iran’s development of ICBMs that could reach Washington DC brings the threat home with added urgency. The nuclear Iran is not just a local issue for Israel.

An Iranian ICBM with a range of nearly 2,500 miles could reach as far west as Central Europe and well into Russia, China and India. The U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency has told Congress that Iran in fact may be capable of developing a 3,000-mi.-range ICBMs by 2015.

It’s unlikely the neighbors would complain if a family installed an alarm system, especially if the family offered to install alarms in every home on the block. Such a generous offer would protect everyone from crime. Friendly, law-abiding neighbors would realize they have everything to gain and nothing to fear.

Russia Objects to Nuclear Defense against Iran

But one neighboring leader objected: Russian President Vladimir Putin. The proposed missile-defense screen would lead to an “inevitable arms race,” he warned, adding, “If the American nuclear potential grows in European territory, we have to give ourselves new targets in Europe.”

Nuclear potential? Targets? That’s an odd way to describe a defensive program that would actually protect nations from weapons. And in fact, Putin seemed to later see the error of his stance, going so far late last week as to volunteer to take part in the defense screen—or did he?

Well, not really. On June 18, The Iranian Foreign Ministry says it has received assurances that Moscow will not let the United States share a Russian radar facility in Azerbaijan as part of a missile shield against Iran -- despite an offer by President Vladimir Putin to U.S. President George W. Bush to do exactly that. The ministry says Russia has no intention of allowing the Americans to use the radar base. Was Putin bluffing when he made the offer to the United States?

Russia is not confirming the Iranian version of events. But it raises the possibility that the Russian offer was bogus and that Putin was merely maneuvering to occupy the high ground in the dispute over the antimissile system.

Anticipating a U.S. rejection of his offer, Putin could say that Russia had gone out of its way to offer a solution but that Washington had not been willing to accept it.

Uranium and Nuclear Power in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan and Iran share access to the Caspian Sea. Kazakhstan could provide the nuclear materials for an Iranian nuclear weapon. Over the past two years, US relations with former Soviet Central Asia nations have collapsed. Indeed, China has become a major player in this region. Russia is also stepping up its military presence in this region. Moreover, barely acknowledged by the Western media, both China and Russia have conducted war games in Central Asia, in collaboration with their own coalition partners. Of special interest are these activities in Central Asia, under which military exercises involving the participation of Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are conducted under the Collective Security Treaty Organization, (CSTO). Iran is developing a mutual military defense strategy with Kazakhstan. See also my article: Global Threats Leading to the Leftist/Marxist -- Islamist Takeover.

If the US can not defend our border, and “Other Than Mexicans” (OTMs) enter at will, can we count on the dysfunctional Kazakhstan government controlling their border. Some of these OTMs could be bringing in nuclear material for Hezbollah, Hamas or al-Qaeda terror cells in the US.

Because of large deposits of uranium, Kazakhstan has developed facilities for the entire nuclear cycle including enrichment of uranium.

Kazakhstan and Russia boast the world’s second and third largest uranium reserves, which are respectively 1 million and 0.8 million tons.

In addition to their nuclear activity, they do have research facilities for designing and manufacturing chemical and biological weapons.

Kazakhstan is rich in oil, one of the 10 largest oil fields in the world in located there. By 2015, it is expected to be the fifth largest producer of oil in the world.

Utembayev Ambassador of Kazakhstan said his country supports Iran’s right to acquire peaceful nuclear technology. “Kazakhstan supports peaceful nuclear research and is opposed to proliferation of nuclear weapons,” Utembayev told IRNA.

Asked about ways to put an end to the nuclear standoff between Iran and the West, he said the issue must be resolved through negotiations and within the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Iran and UAE Review Expansion of Economic Ties

Developing expansion of economic cooperation between Iran and the UAE will lead to forging unity among regional countries. A large Iranian Expiate population is in the UAE.

On June 18, “Iran’s Minister of Commerce Masoud Mir-Kazemi conferred in Dubai with the UAE’s Minister of Economy and Industries Sheikh Hamdan bin Rashid on expansion of mutual and regional cooperation, IRNA reported.”

“Iran possesses new technological know-how with highly profile scientific and technical knowledge in various fields which could be take into consideration, he said.”

The US and the EU and NATO rely on military bases in the UAE and Bahrain to support military operations in the Gulf. The US has also provided advanced military aircraft to the UAE.

The Gulf Cooperation Council will not be used in Attack on Iran

Gulf Arab countries will not be used as a launch pad for any military attack on Iran; Saudi Interior Minister Prince Nayef Bin Abdul Aziz was quoted as saying on June 18.

He said Iran had no interest in striking its oil-producing Arab neighbors if it comes under attack from the United States. “I think the brothers in Iran are totally aware that ... Iran will not be a source of harm for their neighbors and brothers ... These countries (Arab neighbors) will not be a source of harm for Iran,” he said to state news agency SPA.

The Dragon Fleet (China’s Role)

US defense planners are likely to continue to find it hard to take China’s good intentions on trust while the country remains an authoritarian and avowedly communist one-party state. Beijing meanwhile still shows little willingness to embrace the level of transparency that might allay their suspicions.

It is extremely difficult to judge both the current capabilities of China’s maritime fleet and also the strategic goals to which Beijing is likely to put it. But there is no doubting that the navy, long the neglected arm of the People’s Liberation Army, is now at the heart of China’s drive to build a military to match its growing economic and diplomatic clout.

The Need for Addressing the Global Risk

Diplomacy and military strength may deter the expansion of the threat of a global confrontation but the West must address its lack of energy security and dependence on ‘energy interdependence’ instead of ‘energy independence’.

The foreign policy of the United States and Europe must address the energy, the environment, foreign trade, financial, immigration, homeland security and defense tracks in a unified manner. Similarly, addressing the crisis in the Middle East, including the Israel-Palestine solution also involves solving relations with Russia, China and Eurasia.

This will require commitment and pain now to our way of life. It will require sacrifice. The alternative will be even worse.

Until the U.S. and its allies understand who the enemy is and their goals, and put forward a plan for survival, the world will be heading toward a major war of untold destruction. As mentioned above, we are revisiting 1938 and commercial interests and not security are driving our actions, as then.

Europe followed by America stand at the precipice, will they succumb to a hedonist Leftist future scenario and then becoming Islamicized either through the actions of Leftist/Marxist – Alliance or nuclear Holocaust or will they reestablish their Judeo-Christian heritage. The loss of Europe and America may occur by virtue of a collapsed population, faith and identity. Which will it be? It is not possible to determine the outcome, but, YOU the people living in Europe and America can influence the outcome. Decision time is fast approaching.

My advice is to let your position be known.

And “Prepare for War—Pray for a Miracle”.

David J. Jonsson is the author of Clash of Ideologies —The Making of the Christian and Islamic Worlds, Xulon Press 2005. His new book: Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance (Salem Communications (May 30, 2006). He received his undergraduate and graduate degrees in physics. He worked for major corporations in the United States and Japan and with multilateral agencies that brought him to more that fifteen countries with significant or majority populations who are Muslim. These exposures provided insight into the basic tenants of Islam as a political, economic and religious system. He became proficient in Islamic law (Shariah) through contract negotiation and personal encounter. David can be reached at: djonsson2000@yahoo.co.uk




Labels:

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

“Pretty High Land” - Byron King

by Byron King

I told you last week that I have come up to Alaska to participate in a geological field trip, looking at the rocks, minerals, and energy resources of the 49th state from the Kenai Peninsula in the south to Prudhoe Bay and the Arctic Ocean in the north. I have just completed the majority of the trip, and was able to fly down to relatively balmy Fairbanks from very chilly Deadhorse. So now, dear readers, I can take some time to reflect and write to you.

Thrilling and Humbling

On a personal level, I am both thrilled and humbled by my trek across Alaska. In many respects, I am awestruck. And I am privileged, if not blessed, to have been part of the endeavor. I was in the company of a group of astonishingly smart and gifted geologists, supplemented by a number of subscribers to Whiskey & Gunpowder who answered the call of a note that I put out in March. The Whiskey readers were outstanding participants and overall super troopers, as one would expect of such a hardy breed. And the geologists on the transect included the famous Gil Mull, one of the original Richfield Oil (later, ARCO) team that discovered the 15-billion-barrel Prudhoe Bay oil field in 1967. As you can imagine, the discussions of geology and, in particular, the oil and gas potential of Alaska were… well, they were pretty deep. (OK, sorry for the pun.) We “went there,” if you know what I mean. And once you go there, perhaps, I think that you can never really come all the way back. There is just so much to say, dear readers. Where to begin?

Mountains and Pipelines

Let me begin at the beginning and go back to Aug. 21, 1778, when the redoubtable British sea Capt. James Cook was sailing north through what would later be named the Chukchi Sea. Cook had, in fact, sailed farther north than even the most daring Russian navigators of that era or previous times. He went into a region inhabited by the relatively nomadic, but also relatively friendly and industrious Native Alaskan people who eked a living from the sparse fruits of a cold sea. Cook gazed at one distant body of land and wrote in the ship’s log about a place that “appeared to be pretty high land, even down to the sea.” Cook also noted, of interest, that it was “destitute of wood.” Cook called the place Cape Lisburne, after a British earl of that same name. Cape Lisburne is the westernmost extremity of what is now called the Brooks Range.

And what a range of mountains is that Brooks Range! It is a rugged, jagged, foaming ocean of snowcapped mountains, 150 miles wide and 750 miles long, extending from the northwest coastline of Alaska far to the east and deep into the Canadian Yukon. The Brooks Range is larger in many respects than the Appalachians, yet in my experience, few have even heard of this massive geological feature. The Brooks Range, so named in the 1920s after a brilliant and bold geologist who pioneered the exploration of the mountain system, boasts peaks of 10,000 feet in elevation, and lies entirely above the Arctic Circle. Much of it lies within the protective jurisdiction of the Gates of the Arctic National Park and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). The Brooks Range is the northernmost range of mountains in the world, geographically isolating a very flat coastal plain the size of California that is called the North Slope of Alaska.

Earlier in the 20th century, many geologists thought that the Brooks Range was an extension of the U.S. Rocky Mountains and their northerly companion, the Canadian Rockies. But now, in an era when plate tectonics is the operative geological paradigm, it appears that the Brooks Range is its own Arctic mountain system, sui generis, and filled with thrust-faulted masses of sedimentary rocks that are, in turn, closely related in time, space, and tectonic force to the opening of the Arctic Ocean Basin due to sea-floor spreading. And because of this interesting scientific tidbit, the Brooks Range and North Slope offers an entirely different sort of petroleum and natural gas system than one might initially expect when using “lower 48” forms of geological thinking. Hold that thought, dear readers.

I will discuss more geology in this and, of course, future articles. But I also want to get you thinking about the fact that the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) -- in particular, the famous Alaska Pipeline -- has to cross the mighty Brooks Range as part of the first leg of its route south from Prudhoe Bay, about 500 miles east of Cape Lisburne. Thus, in the first push for the petroleum of the North Slope, immense pumps the size of several railroad locomotives connected together in a series drive the oil from sea level to up and over the aforementioned Brooks Range, along a “utility corridor” established by federal law for just that purpose. Currently, the oil pushed through and making the ride amounts to about 800,000 barrels per day, although in earlier years the North Slope was producing, and the Alaska Pipeline was transporting in excess of 2.2 million barrels per day. (The decline is due to reservoir depletion.) Think of just the energy required in overcoming the force of gravity, in order to lift that much oil high enough to cross a broad, high mountain range. Hold that thought, too.

TAPS crosses the Brooks Range at Atigun Pass, a narrow crack in one particular mountain composed of mostly solid quartzite conglomerate. Atigun Pass is about 170 miles south of Prudhoe Bay and sea level, offering one of the only clear shots to the south, albeit over a glacially carved valley and at an elevation more than 4,800 feet above sea level. Atigun Pass is, they say, utterly treacherous in wintertime, which is most of the time up here. And the Brooks Range is just one of three immense mountain ranges, and nearly 1,000 rivers and streams, that the Alaska Pipeline crosses in its long 800-mile path to Valdez on the southern coastline of Alaska. Hold that thought as well.

Putting Thoughts Together

OK, dear readers, I asked you to hold some thoughts and now it is time to put some of these thoughts together from the perspective of Outstanding Investments. [Greg’s Note: Outstanding Investments is the best performing stock research newsletter in the world over the past five years. Go here to subscribe.]

Hydrocarbon-Bearing Formations

One of the oil-bearing and -producing formations at Prudhoe Bay is called the “Lisburne limestone.” Does that name sound familiar? It should, because it is related in time and origins to the rocks that form Capt. Cook’s so-named Cape Lisburne, many hundreds of miles to the east. And there are many other hydrocarbon-bearing rock formations that the good Capt. Cook never saw or suspected, currently productive or otherwise prospective, north of the Brooks Range. These rock formations are deeply buried under the North Slope, and extend from under the Chukchi Sea, along the northern coastline of Alaska and offshore, following the line of the Arctic Ocean all the way over into northern Canada. Also of exploration interest, somewhere in northern Canada, according to some geologists, lies the “other half” of the Arctic Basin rift system, where there may be rock units similar to what we find beneath the North Slope. So there is immense hydrocarbon potential along the North Slope, and perhaps elsewhere in the northern region of North America.

Isolated, Vast, Cold

Yet despite the rich prospective hydrocarbon potential of this vast Arctic area, it is immensely difficult to accomplish even the most basic of tasks. The place is almost entirely uninhabited and there are simply no roads or other infrastructure. Ingress and egress is by dog sled in winter, airlift most other times (except when the winds are blowing 150 miles per hour), or barge during the few ice-free months of summer. Most everything else currently arrives in Deadhorse, Alaska, after a 420-mile trip up the 20-foot-wide gravel “Haul Road” (now named the Dalton Highway) that parallels the Alaska Pipeline from Fairbanks to Prudhoe Bay. My group of touring geologists rode up that rough road in a set of tough vans, viewing (and feeling) every hard mile of Haul Road, and observing the Pipeline in all its industrial glory, which is significant.

Climate is, as one would expect so far north of the Arctic Circle, constantly extreme and from an environmental standpoint extremely fragile. As Capt. Cook noted, the area is “destitute of wood.” Yes, indeed, and it is destitute of almost everything else under God’s sun. In fact, for many months of the year, it is destitute of even the sun. And it is cold, too. It is very cold, my friends. When I stood at the edge of the Arctic Sea the other day, a sunny day in June, with my boots just touching the ice-clogged waters, the temperature was nominally in the low 30s Fahrenheit. But I think that somebody was lying. It had to be colder than that, or perhaps it was the 40-knot gusts of wind that cut through and penetrated a U.S. Navy-issue Gore-Tex Arctic outer liner, plus numerous other layers of protective clothing. There is something about the Arctic wind that just wants to kill you, and for a deeper understanding of that, I recommend any of a number of poems by the great Robert Service. But the point is: Wow, was it ever cold!

When you find something in that frozen north (and if you look hard, dear readers, you probably will), what do you do with it? How much is there? What are the numbers on any given prospect? What are the economics? What is the environmental impact? How do you plan for large-scale industrial development in such a remote and harsh environment? What are the logistic challenges, the hurdles, the utter barriers (such as crossing Gates of the Arctic National Park lands or ANWR) to accomplishing what you want to do? How do you arrange for long-term extraction operations, and transport your treasure to the eager markets of the world? These are just the first of many hard and exceedingly expensive questions you have to ask.

One of the World’s Great Oil Finds

I mentioned earlier that geologist Gil Mull, who was part of the original exploration team that found the Prudhoe Bay field in 1967, was on the trip to the north. Gil described the early days of exploring around Prudhoe Bay in the mid-1960s, when the oil workers would take off in a transport aircraft from Fairbanks and fly north to an utterly isolated drill site on the edge of the frozen Arctic Ocean. This was, of course, before the Haul Road, the Pipeline or anything else even remotely resembling the current state of development after 40 years. There was no global positioning system (GPS) in those days, and not even any of the radio navigation aids that were then around and available farther south but not working so far north. All they had to steer by was dead reckoning, aiming the nose of the airplane eventually at the glowing light on top of the drilling rig. Little rig, big Arctic. And once they saw the light, they would land the airplane, in the dark, on an ice runway carved out of frozen tundra. Any volunteers?

To give away the happy ending of the story of the first well in the Prudhoe Bay area, the “discovery well” of one of the world’s great oil finds, they drilled into a 300-foot gas cap at the top of a deeply buried structure, underlain by dozens of feet of oil-soaked sandstones and conglomerate. Many months later, when they drilled the confirmation well about seven miles away on the flank of the structure, they found over 400 feet of oil column in the rocks. Gil discussed how, during one coring operation, they started to pull the core out of the drilling tube and “it simply flowed out, just sand and rock and oil, 180 degrees or so hot, flowing and steaming all over the drilling deck.” At one point, the geologists conducted what is called a “drill stem test,” in which they allowed the fluids from the well simply to flow into the drill pipe. “We rapidly had a supercritical pressure buildup,” said Gil. “And then we closed off the drill stem mechanism and it took over 12 hours simply to blow down the pressure. We were flaring natural gas for 12 hours just to get the high pressure down.”

Yes, Gil was fortunate enough to have been part of a group that found the largest oil field ever discovered in the U.S. or Canada, 10 billion barrels, or so they thought at the time (now we know that it is much larger, near 15 billion barrels). But the Prudhoe Bay field got developed only because it was so large. Anything much smaller might not have paid off, because there was no other infrastructure. The next step was to build the Haul Road and adjacent Alaska Pipeline, which ultimately took an act of Congress and a total of $11 billion in 1970s-era dollars.

Could we do something similar today? And we have to ask, would it be worth it to do so? Because, dear readers, whatever happens is going to cost, and cost really big, and I mean that in many respects. This is spectacular territory, but it is spectacularly fragile and treacherous as well. As Barry Lopez wrote in his book Arctic Dreams, “No summer is long enough to take away the winter. The winter always comes.” To my observation, winter never really leaves.

Think of this in terms of current and future exploration to the far west of Prudhoe Bay, in what is quaintly labeled on the pretty maps as the “National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.” Yeah, right. “Petroleum Reserve.” Piece of cake, huh? Who is going to develop that “petroleum reserve”? Who will pay to drill it up, and to build the next part of the Arctic energy complex? Who will take the risks, and make a series of large hydrocarbon discoveries, and then build an accompanying “Northern Pipeline” across 500 miles of North Slope and Arctic Ocean coastline? Will anyone venture to build something else down to the south (and if so, to where?) across that all-but-impenetrable Brooks Range of mountains? Think about it. Who is going to do that? Will someone find another Prudhoe Bay and mark out another Atigun Pass, maybe? There is nothing easy about this, nothing at all, not even breathing that cold Arctic air.

Things Are Going to Happen

I will close by saying that I believe strongly that many great and vast and difficult things are going to happen in northern Alaska, and I am going to watch it all like a hawk. But I know, and I am absolutely certain, that whatever happens will have to occur in a harsh and utterly unforgiving Arctic world that is very much different from the world in which our civilization developed its resources in the past. People are, in all likelihood, going to do what has to be done, and spend the funds to accomplish the tasks. But what challenges! And what expenses! And what risks! Fools dare not rush in, and we want to screen those fools out of our Outstanding Investments portfolio. That is why I am discussing so much in this update to you.

Looking at things more broadly, I do not think that, at any time over its entire history, mankind has ever done anything remotely similar in scope to what is going to occur up in the frozen north over the next few generations. As I stated near the beginning of this article, I am simply humbled at the measure of the task. I am awestruck.

Please keep reading this newsletter, dear readers. There is much more to say. But for now, I bid you all adieu.

Until we meet again…
Byron W. King

For Whiskey and Gunpowder

Byron King currently serves as an attorney in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He received his Juris Doctor from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 1981 and is a cum laude graduate of Harvard University. Byron is also co-editor of Outstanding Investments.

Labels: ,

Sunday, June 24, 2007

The Solitary Bear - Puru Saxena

by Puru Saxena

BIG PICTURE - Cash is trash! Today, currencies continue to perform their function as a medium of exchange, but they certainly aren't a genuine store of value; or a guardian of purchasing power. Thanks to the ongoing unprecedented money-supply and credit growth (inflation) on a global scale, currencies have stopped fulfilling this crucial function; thereby robbing the masses of their hard-earned savings. In this highly inflationary world where more or less everything is in a bull-market (at least when measured against various currencies), the only "asset" that is in the bear's lair is central-bank produced paper "money". Figure 1 clearly highlights the fact that the major world currencies have lost between 25% and 75% of their purchasing power through inflation since 1980! For this system to work however, this solitary bear-market in "money" must remain concealed from the public for the fear that the masses may stop accepting these currencies as a medium of exchange. In order to proliferate this fraud, the officials keep up with the "inflation-fighting" propaganda through their totally bogus and meaningless "inflation" figures which are constantly spewed out by the media.

Figure 1: Safe haven of cash?


Source: Hans Eisenkolb

Taking into account the course of action chosen by the various central-banks, I am convinced that the various currencies will continue to depreciate in value against assets. In other words, I expect that the stealth confiscation of savings will continue through inflation. For sure, they may be temporary set-backs or corrections in asset-prices but the major trend is up. Before you disagree with my assessment, take into account the fact that despite an average economic backdrop (sky-high deficits and debt-levels in the developed nations), over the past 4 years, all assets appreciated at the same time! Despite rising interest-rates and geo-political tensions, even property and bond prices managed to stay strong together with equities, commodities and collectibles.

At the beginning of this decade, if I had told you that 7 years later crude oil would be trading above $60 per barrel, gold would be close to $700 per ounce, food prices would be at multi-year highs and the Dow Jones would be trading around 13,500, you would have pronounced me crazy! However, this is exactly what has happened and there is nothing in the works to suggest that this major trend is about to change in the near future. In other words, I anticipate that barring short or medium-term corrections, asset-prices will continue to trend higher in nominal terms UNLESS the central-banks change their expansionary monetary policies and decide to rapidly raise interest-rates. In all likelihood, this scenario may not unfold for a few more years and until such time, investors should be able to protect their savings through the returns generated from the capital markets.

In the world of investing, it all comes down to supply and demand. Items which are in high demand tend to rise in value against items whose supply is increasing rapidly. So, turning to today's situation, the money-supply is rising by roughly 10% per annum in several countries and the supply of assets is not keeping pace. Hence the bull-market in asset-prices when measured in terms of currencies. Now, I am not saying that the explosive growth in the supply of currencies cannot and will not be reversed in the future, thereby causing sharp contractions in asset-prices. For sure, it could easily reverse. But for that to happen, we would have to see genuine monetary-tightening through significantly higher interest-rates and a sharp increase in the banks' minimum reserve requirements. The central banks know fully well that given the high debt levels, such drastic measures would probably cause a global depression, widespread unemployment and social unrest. So, they will try and avoid or delay this outcome as much as possible, thereby further assisting the bull-market in asset-prices and the death spiral for your cash savings.

Recently, several well-regarded economists and analysts have issued compelling reports explaining why the end is nigh. I tend to agree with their assessment that some assets are over-stretched and ripe for a correction (Chinese A-shares come to mind). However, I do not buy into the thesis that just because the bull-market in equities and commodities is 5 years old, it must stop immediately. History has shown that since the abandonment of gold in the early 1970's, bull-markets have lasted for very long periods of time. Moreover, the current bull-market in equities (especially my preferred emerging-markets) and natural resources is well-supported by the very real forces of Asian industrialization, urbanization together with supply and demand imbalances. So, taking into account the strong money-supply growth and the rapid transformation of Asia and Latin America, I am inclined to think that the global boom in stocks and commodities will continue for several more years.

There can be no disputing the fact that the global expansion is now 5 years old and well-advertised, accordingly the "low-hanging fruit may not come by so easily. Furthermore, I envisage that in the future, investors will have to become more selective when making decisions and deploying their capital. For maximum success and safety, I would urge you to invest your capital during pullbacks whilst avoiding overstretched markets. Despite all the talk of "doom & gloom", this strategy should continue to deliver reasonable returns in the period ahead.

The above is an excerpt from Money Matters, a monthly economic publication, which highlights extraordinary investment opportunities in all major markets. In addition to the monthly reports, subscribers also benefit from timely and concise "Email Updates", which are sent out when an important development in the capital markets warrants immediate attention. Subscribe Today!

Puru Saxena
www.purusaxena.com

Puru Saxena is the founder of Puru Saxena Limited. Vastly experienced and respected in his field, he is a registered investment adviser with the SFC. He conducts in-depth economic research and formulates our firm's investment strategy.

Puru Saxena has a decade’s experience in the finance industry, specifically relating to investment advice and asset management.

An investment adviser based in Hong Kong, he is a regular guest on CNBC, BBC, Bloomberg, NDTV Profit and writes for several newspapers and financial journals.

Copyright © 2005-2007 Puru Saxena Limited. All rights reserved

Labels:

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Big Growth Opportunities in Wellhead Equipment - Dan Amoss

by Dan Amoss
Oil and gas resources once thought completely out of reach have now arrived in the fuel tanks and furnaces of consumers around the world.

Opinions differ about the future capabilities of oil field technology. Some argue that technology will allow us to unlock trillions of barrels worth of oil out of unconventional and not-yet-discovered resources. Others argue that every technology in use today was developed 20 or 30 years ago; not only that, but growing service industry bottlenecks could halt several desperately needed development projects in their tracks.

While both sides of this debate have valid points, I think it's important to remain focused on the progress under way at major projects and depletion of large existing fields, and not argue about potential resources 30 years into the future. We want to profit from the decline of Peak Oil and its subsequent political instability now.

Since the advent of the oil business, scientists and engineers have developed a series of very remarkable technologies. Oil field technology tends to compound at a steady rate, extending the boundary of what was long considered the absolute limit of exploration and production.

Resource owners usually want to produce a hydrocarbon reservoir as fast as safety and engineering limits allow, so it makes sense that most oil field technology was developed to accelerate the process. The concept of "time value of money" doesn't end on Wall Street; it extends to the oil patch. Producers are under pressure to satisfy the demands of employees, bankers, tax collectors, and shareholders, so the sooner oil and gas arrive, the better.

This picture of working to beat the clock not only applies for newer discoveries, but it also applies for projects that strive to extend the lives of older fields. Oil field equipment and services have become very expensive and are likely to become even more expensive in the coming years. The free market is the driving force behind oil field technologies.

If there's thought to be a few million more barrels of oil left in an old well, an operator will go ahead with an enhanced oil field recovery project if the return on investment is high enough. But if oil and gas prices fall and service prices remain high over the course of this project, this operator can lose a lot of money. So timing is of the essence.

Oil service stocks that can grow regardless of operator budgets are difficult to find. But I recently discovered one for Strategic Investment readers that’s fairly unique. It’s fairly insulated from the booms and busts of the oil field investment cycle, yet has incredible growth potential. Its technology has proven to be very valuable for operators extending the lives of older wells, but it also plays a key role in unlocking the value of low-quality oil and gas. Its equipment and expertise will remain in very high demand by oil field operators around the globe for years to come.

How Sour Crude Can Lead to Sweet Profits

Low-viscosity, or "sticky," heavy crude and sour crude with high levels of impurities like sulfur require extra steps in both wellhead processing and refining. The initial step in crude oil refining really occurs at the wellhead, the site where it's first pulled from the ground.

The trend toward heavier, sourer crude oil will directly benefit manufacturers of specialized wellhead equipment. These lower grades of crude make up a steadily rising share of global oil production because, just as you'd expect, the sweetest, lowest-hanging fruit in the oil patch tends to be picked and consumed first.

More barrels of crude will require upgrading, particularly the abundant, yet barely accessible heavy crude from sources like the Orinoco Belt in Venezuela. Technology is what the Venezuelans, the Russians and the Saudis need, and they will pay up for it.

Some of the biggest wealth-creating companies of the next generation will be those that can unlock the value of these politically unstable resources - without committing billions in capital to projects that can be seized overnight.

I’ve already told my Strategic Investment readers all about a company that specializes in manufacturing oil and gas production equipment. It sells this equipment into most major oil and gas basins around the world, and it’s a great way to play on the growing natural gas market.

With that said, the odds are the next few years will look like the last few - a period of growing resource nationalization not unlike hoarding. Leaders of countries sitting on vast reserves are taking actions in the best interest of their people (or their personal Swiss bank account) and telling major oil companies to get out.

Vladimir Putin and Hugo Chavez wouldn't have kicked the big oil companies out if they hadn't planned on granting major development projects to big service companies like Schlumberger, Baker Hughes and Halliburton, just because of the fact that most of their countries’ remaining reserves are difficult to produce.

"Megaprojects" Hampered by Bottlenecks

Yet despite having access to the best oil field technology in the world, most big projects still suffer from bottlenecks, delays, and cost overruns. This phenomenon is widespread enough that it supports the core ideas behind the Peak Oil theory - most notably that the "easy oil" has already been consumed.

Chris Skrebowski, editor of Petroleum Review, became a leading Peak Oil theory proponent after initially setting out to prove that it was nothing more than worrywarts seeking to make headlines. With decades of international oil field consulting and research experience, he ran the numbers and concluded that data on both historical production and future projects were not precise enough to assume ample oil supply as far as the eye can see.

So Skrebowski started a "megaprojects" database to track the projects widely expected to satisfy growing demand. He's noticed an undeniable trend of delayed startups and shortages of everything from drilling rigs to qualified personnel. Assuming that the current backlog of projects proceeds without a hitch, he expects that "24.8 [million barrels per day] of new capacity [is] due to come onstream between January 2007 and December 2012."

An extra 24.8 million barrels per day of new capacity may sound like plenty for the world's 2012 production needs. After all, it represents a little over 4% annual growth over the next six years. But this ignores depletion of the existing base, the elephant in the room that most Peak Oil critics either overlook or avoid.

Skrebowski warns that the data behind the existing base, especially from national oil companies like Saudi Aramco, are not transparent enough for us to make happy assumptions about long-term supply. If average global depletion is running a little over 4% per year - a fair estimate - the world is likely to have the same oil production capacity in 2012 as it has today. With relentless demand growth, flattening worldwide production would send oil prices well into the triple digits for good.

Skrebowski draws two conclusions from his latest megaprojects analysis. "First, data on production, project performance, and depletion rates are wholly unsatisfactory, particularly for the OPEC producers. Second, the large volumes of new capacity being added between 2007-2012 may not translate into the sort of increased production flows the world economy needs to underpin economic growth."

Companies that play critical supporting roles in extending oil and gas production will be great investments over this 2007-2012 timeframe.

Good investing,
Dan Amoss, CFA
Dan Amoss CFA is managing editor of Strategic Investment, the highly respected US newsletter. Previously Dan worked at Investment Counselors of Maryland - investment advisors tor one of America's top small-cap value mutual funds over the past 15 years.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Dangerous Divergences in the Global Bond and Stock Markets - Gary Dorsch

Once upon a time, many years ago, the US stock market lived in fear of a violent band of traders known as the "bond market vigilantes". Whenever the Federal Reserve's money supply measures grew too rapidly, or the US economy grew too strongly threatening to stoke higher inflation, the "bond vigilantes" would take matters into their own hands, by jacking-up 30-year Treasury bond yields as much as 25 basis points or short-term T-bill rates by 50 basis points in a single day.

Former US Treasury secretary Robert Rubin convinced his boss, President Bill Clinton that taming the "bond vigilantes" by reducing the budget deficit was the surest way to reach long-term economic prosperity. As Clinton's political guru James Carville famously put it, "I used to think if there was reincarnation, I wanted to come back as the president or the Pope or a .400 baseball hitter, but now I want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody," he once quipped.

But during the first Bush administration, when the Treasury's budget was spinning out of control with a $445 billion deficit in fiscal 2004, the infamous "bond vigilantes" slipped into hibernation. Instead, a new band of traders with much deeper pockets, the Bank of Japan, the People's Bank of China, and the Arab Oil kingdoms were cornering the US Treasury market, and keeping yields pinned near historic lows.

Tokyo and Beijing acquired a combined $2.1 trillion of foreign exchange reserves, mostly held in US dollar bonds, thru massive intervention to keep the yen and yuan weak, and plowed their newly acquired dollars into US bonds. Today, Japan owns $612 billion of US Treasuries, after purchasing $334 billion US dollars in 2003-04. Beijing owns $420 billion of US Treasuries, and more than $500 billion of US agency and corporate bonds, with little regard for the outlook for inflation.

As crude oil prices more than doubled to over $65 per barrel, OPEC's oil revenue reached $968 billion in 2006 from around $300 billion in 2002, Arab Oil kingdoms invested about $314 billion into the US Treasury market thru their London brokers, representing one-fourth of the $1.3 trillion of petrodollars invested globally over the 3-years. Last week, the US Treasury said holdings of US securities by foreign central banks and governments rose to $2.3 trillion by the end of June 2006.

Perhaps, the most important single factor allowing the global economy to grow at 5% or more for each of the past four years has been historically low bond yields, courtesy of Asian central banks and Arabian petrodollars. Indirectly, abnormally low bond yields spawned $1.5 trillion of US mergers and takeovers in 2006, and $1 trillion so far this year, up 70% from the same period a year earlier. Globally, M&A mushroomed to $3.6 trillion in 2006 and $1.9 trillion so far this year.

Also behind the boom in global stock markets, hedge-fund assets tripled in the past decade to $1.57 trillion, and private- equity companies are bidding $447 billion for companies so far this year, versus $228 billion in the year-ago period. Corporate treasurers are exploiting the gap between the low yield on bonds and the earnings yield on stocks through record share buybacks, driving equity prices sharply higher.

The Bernanke Fed is also operating behind the curtain, inflating the broad M3 money supply at an annualized 12.2% rate, its fastest clip in 5-years. Each morning, before the opening of the NYSE, the Bernanke Fed buys Treasuries to accommodate strong loan demand from private equity groups and leveraged takeover artists, and prevent short-term borrowing rates from rising.

The global stock buying frenzy might not have been possible, if the "bond vigilantes" weren't sedated by Arab Oil kingdoms, China, Japan, and other central bankers.

But interestingly enough, when the Dow Jones Industrials climbed above the psychological 13,000 barrier for the first time, the "bond vigilantes" began to crawl out of their cave. On June 1st, the Treasury's 10-year yield rose to 4.98%, its highest level in nine-months. Treasury yields were rising despite news that the US economy slowed to a scant 0.6% growth rate in Q'1, its weakest in 4-½ years, largely due to a sharp downturn in the housing sector.

Fed officials believe the correction in the housing market is likely to "weigh heavily" on economic growth for the remainder of the year, but "the risk that inflation would fail to moderate as desired remained the committee's predominant concern," the Fed said on May 30th. So as hopes fade for Fed rate cuts this year, traders are dumping long-term T-Notes in favor of high flying US and foreign stocks.

The "bond vigilantes" might have greater room to maneuver in the months ahead, as Beijing observes its massive US bond portfolio, estimated at over $900 billion, slide into a free-fall, when depreciating US dollars are converted back into Chinese yuan. China's massive $233 billion trade surplus with the US last year is going up in smoke, even before the "bond vigilantes" have a good crack at the bat.

China controls $1.2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves and steady purchases of longer-dated Treasuries could evaporate, after the PBoC widened the trading band for the yuan on May 18th, allowing for a swifter devaluation of the US dollar. Beijing could decide to recycle its massive trade surplus into riskier assets.

But Fed chief Ben Bernanke is not worried about Beijing dumping US bonds in the future. "I think the cost to them of doing this would be greater than the cost to us. A substantial move on their part would be disruptive in the market in the short term, but in the longer term, the dollar and Treasury yields would largely recover," he told the Senate Banking Committee on Feb 14th.

"I do not believe China's substantial accumulation of reserves (recycled into US bonds) in itself represents a problem for the United States or for US monetary policy," Bernanke wrote on March 26th. "Because foreign holdings of US Treasury securities represent only a small part of total US credit market debt outstanding, US credit markets should be able to absorb without great difficulty any shift of foreign allocations," he said in a letter to Sen. Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican.

"And even if such a shift were to put undesired upward pressure on US interest rates, the Federal Reserve has the capacity to operate in domestic money markets to maintain interest rates at a level consistent with our economic goals," Bernanke added. Would Bernanke speed up the printing presses to buy bonds from Beijing?

Bond Vigilantes Unleashed in Europe

While American bond vigilantes are just stepping into the batter's box, the German bund vigilantes are already on first base, jacking up European benchmark yields to multi-year highs. Germany's 10-year bund yield rose to 4.50% this week, its highest since Dec' 2003, while the 2-year yield climbed to 4.42%, a five-year high.

"Euro zone inflation risks are rising and the European Central Bank is keeping its options open on how much further to raise interest rates," said Greek central banker Nicholas Garganas on May 30th. "All the options for a further increase in interest rates and the pace and size of further adjustment are open. Inflation risks are on the upside and increasing," he warned.

"A number of factors are pointing to an inflation rate which is higher than expected so far this year," Garangas said, pointing to strong money and credit growth, higher oil prices, and lower unemployment. "The ECB needs to exercise strong vigilance to keep price pressures in check," warned Bundesbank chief Axel Weber on May 16th.

Since March 13th, Euro zone traders have been dumping German bunds and switching into high-flying European blue chips stocks. The ECB has spoken a million words about the risks of higher inflation, but has only lifted its repo rate a quarter-point this year. The ECB has tolerated explosive growth of the Euro M3 money supply, which hit a 24-year high of 10.9% in March, far above the central bank's target of 4.5%, which it believes is consistent with low inflation.

"It would be unwise to discard monetary analysis, especially now that asset prices are at a high and liquidity at an unprecedented scale worldwide," warned the BBK's Weber on June 3rd. "Interest rates are low in the Euro area," said Dutch central bank chief Nout Wellink on June 4th. "These low interest rates show up in asset prices, not only in the stock market, but also the housing market and other financial markets."

The ECB's slow-motion tightening strategy hasn't restrained the growth of the European money supply. In fact, Euro M3 money supply is growing at a much faster rate today, than when the ECB began raising its repo rate in December 2005. While the mainstream media points to ECB rate hikes as proof of a tighter monetary policy, double-digit Euro M3 growth points to a super-easy ECB money policy.

The ECB pursues a clandestine policy of pumping up European real estate and stock markets, to boost consumer confidence and spending at home by inflating M3. The ECB's sleight of hand is part of its game of "Smoke and Mirrors" designed to lull German "bund vigilantes" to sleep, while it quietly pumps up asset markets.

But the Norwegian government recognized the shell game on April 13th, and said it planned to raise the equity component of its $314 billion oil fund to as much as 60% of total assets from 40%, while reducing the portion held in bonds. According to the Norwegian Pension Fund's 2006 report, it owned 154 billion crowns ($25.7 billion) of German Bunds, and 44 billion crowns in European Investment Bank bonds.

To restore its badly tarnished image of an inflation fighter, the ECB has telegraphed a quarter-point rate hike to 4.00% in June, and to 4.25% by September. The ECB was forced into the tightening mode, since gold is flirting with the psychological 500 euros /ounce. In Frankfurt, Euro Libor traders are pricing in the possibility of a third ECB rate hike to 4.50% by year's end.

So it was surprising that on June 1st, the ECB decided to suspend its remaining share of gold sales thru Sept 26th. That gave a small shot of adrenalin to the gold market, jumping back to 500 euros per ounce, and lifted the yield on the Euro Libor rate for December by 7 basis points to 4.57 percent. Stubbornly high gold prices in Europe provide more fodder for the German "bund vigilantes" in Frankfurt, whose set the benchmark yields for the rest of the Euro zone.

The Bank of England faces a Backlash

For the past three years, the ECB has operated under the same modus operandi as the Bank of England, inflating the money supply to buoy home and equity markets. But last week, the British gilt vigilantes, who have been locked in a tight box for the past eight years, came very close to breaking out. Two-year British gilt yields climbed to 5.78% on June 1st, a level not seen since in seven years. Ten-year gilt yields climbed to 5.32%, the highest since mid-2002.

For the past eight years, the UK's 10-year Gilt yield has been locked in a tight range between 4.00% and 5.35%, benefiting from foreign capital inflows seeking to profit from an appreciating British pound. But how much longer can the long-term Gilt market ignore the monetary abuse of the BoE? On April 24th, a group of leading UK economists including former BoE member Charles Goodhart criticized the BoE for ignoring double-digit growth of the money supply since 2005.

A week later, BoE chief King admitted that, "the growth of money and credit may signal in advance of other indicators that the Bank rate is set at a level inconsistent with bringing inflation back to the target in the medium term," he said. On May 10th, the BoE lifted its base lending rate by a quarter-point to a 6-year high of 5.50%, with consumer inflation raging at 3.1% it's highest in more than a decade.

But UK house prices jumped 0.9% in April and 0.5% in May, even after three BoE rate hikes, and stand 10.3% higher from a year ago. The price of a typical UK house is 181,584 pounds, or about 17,000 pounds higher than at the same time last year. Not surprising, with the UK's M4 money supply 13.3% higher from a year ago.

Asian Bond Vigilantes Ring the Alarm Bells

The Korean Kospi Index has been on a record-breaking rally over the past two months, and is up 20.6% so far this year, surpassing the 1,700-point mark for the first time, after extending gains for a 13th straight week. A quarter of listed Kospi stocks rose 50% or more this year, and 8% of Kospi stocks are up more than 100%.

South Korea's economy, Asia's third-largest after Japan and China, has expanded for 16-quarters in a row, marking the longest winning streak since the 1990's. Behind the scenes, the Bank of Korea (BoK) is inflating its M3 money supply, buoying stock prices but rattling the bond market. (A 5-year graph of the Korean M3 money supply and Koribor rates is presented in the June 8th edition of Global Money Trends).

The Korean central bank lifted its overnight loan rate by 125 basis points to 4.50% last year, and raised bank reserve ratios by 2% to 7%, but in defiance of its baby-step tightening maneuvers, Korea's M3 money supply exploded from a 7% growth rate to an annualized 12.3% in April 2007, its fastest rate in 4 ½-years.

Korean housing prices are growing four times as fast as consumer prices. Housing prices across South Korea were 9.7% higher in May than a year before, compared with a 2.3% annual rise in consumer prices. Despite the explosive growth of the money supply, coupled with a strong economy, the BoK is holding its overnight loan rate steady at 4.50% for a tenth consecutive month.

Korean "bond vigilantes" are alarmed by the BoK's super-easy money policy, and have jacked up the government's borrowing costs by 50 basis points over the past three months. Seoul plans to sell 3.74 trillion won ($4 billion) of Treasury bonds in June, compared with 4.45 trillion won worth offered in May, adding to bearish sentiment. But the half-percent increase in 5-year yields hasn't been sufficient to knock the Kospi Index off its upward trajectory.

"Abundant global liquidity is one of the risky factors that all countries need to monitor," South Korea's finance minister Kwon O-kyu told reporters on May 17th. "We have to monitor how much the US economy slows down and how much growth in China and India can compensate. Global liquidity may be maintained for some period but the China effect cannot continue for ever," he warned.

The Bank of Korea is disturbed by the double-digit growth of the M3 money supply. So what's preventing the BoK from raising its interest rates, and what other powerful force in the global marketplace helps the Korean Kospi Index defy the law of gravity? The answers are inter-related and were provided in the June 1st edition of Global Money Trends).

Aussie Bond Vigilantes dig deeper "Down Under"

Australian bonds have lost considerable ground in recent weeks as Aussie traders dumped safe-haven government debt, in favor of riskier stocks. Australian bond futures fell to their lowest in three years on June 5th, with Aussie "bond vigilantes" taking their cue from bears in Asia, Europe, and North America. The Aussie 10-year bond yield broke thru the psychological 6% barrier last week, and a break-out above 6.20% would send yields to their highest since 2002.

The latest slide in Aussie bonds has caught many traders off guard, since the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is expected to leave its cash lending rate unchanged at 6.25% for the remainder of the year. On April 23rd, the Australian statistics bureau said the local consumer price index climbed 0.1% in the first quarter, lowering the annual rate of inflation to 2.4% from 3.3% in the previous quarter.

That left the CPI in the middle of the RBA's 2% to 3% inflation target. But not all Aussie bond traders are duped by inflation statistics conjured up by government apparatchniks. Instead, Australia's jobless rate fell to 4.4% in April, to a 32-year trough and stoking concerns that a super-tight labor market would eventually threaten higher inflation and interest rates.

While the mainstream media points to doctored-up government statistics on inflation as gospel, Aussie "bond vigilantes" are following the money. The Australian bank's cash rate of 6.25% might sound high compared to other countries, but in reality, the RBA is pursuing a super-easy money policy, allowing its M3 money supply to expand at an explosive 13.7% annualized rate. (A fascinating graph of the Aussie M3 money supply and Libor rates is included in the June 8th edition of Global Money Trends).

What's most interesting about the Australian bond market is that the government barely issues enough new paper to cover maturities. Flush with cash after a string of budget surpluses, Aussie bonds outstanding are around A$60 billion, down from around A$94 billion when Prime Minister John Howard came to power in 1996. That is in sharp contrast to the United States where total public debt has ballooned by 50% since the turn of the century to reach $8.8 trillion.

Foreigners have become big buyers of Australian government bonds and hold around 75% of all marketable debt, up from just 30% in the early 1990's. So the task of the Aussie "bond vigilantes" in jacking-up Treasury bond yields is daunting, given the small supply of T-bonds outstanding, and the insatiable appetite of Asian central bankers. But a super tight jobs market, a booming economy, explosive growth of the M3 money supply, and a new round of $A67 billion in income tax cuts, gives the Aussie "bond vigilantes, plenty of ammunition to work with.

Canadian Bond Vigilantes Flex some Muscle

Canadian "bond vigilantes" have chipped away at government bond prices for the past three months, following a slew of economic data that paints a picture of a red-hot economy and higher inflation. The Canadian economy grew 3.7% in the first quarter of 2007, compared with 1.5% in the previous quarter, setting the stage for a new round of Bank of Canada rate hikes.

Canada's commodity exports are booming and the core rate of inflation is above target at 2.5% in April. "On balance, the bank judges that there is an increased risk that future inflation will persist above the 2% inflation target. And some increase in the target for the overnight rate may be required in the near term to bring inflation back to target," the Bank of Canada warned on May 29th.

Canadian bond vigilantes are grinding government paper lower, even as Ottawa pays off some of its national debt. After paying down C$13.2 billion on Canada's national debt in September 2006, the budget for 2007 further reduces the debt by C$9.2 billion, which would bring the balance down to C$472.3 billion, or 35% of GDP, a 25-year low. Canada's federal debt has fallen by C$81.4bn over the past decade.

The inflation alarm bells went off in the Canadian bond market, because the central bank miscalculated the underlying strength of the economy and permitted its M3 money supply to expand at double-digit rates in April. Canada's M3 money supply surged from 6.3% in June 2006 to a 10% growth rate in April, after the central bank made a pre-mature decision to pause its rate hike campaign at 4.25%.

(A cool graph of the Canadian M3 money supply and the Bank of Canada's overnight loan rate is presented in the June 8th edition of Global Money Trends). In order to rein-in the M3 growth rate, the BoC must narrow the interest rate gap with the US fed funds rate of 5.25%. That's lifted the Canadian dollar to 30-year highs against the US dollar, which can help shield Canada from higher import prices.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper gave a thumbs-up to a stronger Canuck buck on May 31st. "The rising Canadian dollar is a reflection of the underlying strength of the Canadian economy. Interfering with the currency's appreciation to save manufacturing jobs would be a huge mistake," Harper said. The energy and mineral based economy in western Canada, has been the driver of economic growth.

Natural resources have outperformed the weakening manufacturing sector in Ontario and Quebec, which has been hard hit by a high Canadian dollar and troubles in the lumber and paper industry. Overall, Canada's unemployment rate has not budged from 6.1%, a 33-year low, for three straight months, so with the BoC set to rekindle its tightening campaign in the weeks ahead, the Canadian "bond vigilantes" have plenty of ammunition to work with in the months ahead.

Dangerous Divergences and the Chinese "Bond Vigilantes"

It's easy to say that what goes up, must come down. But stock markets don't necessarily follow the laws of Newtonian Physics. The Russian Trading System Index stays perched in the stratosphere, with the Russian central bank inflating its money supply at a 57% annualized rate.Central banks have to make a determined effort to deflate stock market bubbles, even at the cost of a slower economy.

Explosive money supply growth, stock buybacks, and mergers and takeovers, are all linked to the super easy money policies, within the context of a larger game of competitive currency devaluations. However, the most powerful force moving global stock markets today, wasn't even mentioned in this article, but is highlighted in each weekly edition of the Global Money Trends newsletter. So far, this powerful force moving stock markets shows no signs of abating, but what are the early warning signals of a possible reversal of the market's good fortune?

In Shanghai, the Chinese "bond vigilantes" have jacked-up yields on the benchmark 5-year Treasury bond by 105 basis points over the past two months, to 3.82% today, the highest in 3-years, and including a 50 basis point surge over the past 2-days. While the mainstream media points to Beijing's tiny 0.2% tax increase on stock transactions to explain the wicked 21% correction in Shanghai red-chips, quietly, little is spoken of the Chinese "bond vigilantes," emerging from hibernation.

On May 23rd, Guru Al Greenspan said the recent boom in Chinese stocks could not last. "It is clearly unsustainable. There's going to be a dramatic contraction at some point," he correctly predicted, but did not say why. On May 31st, PBoC deputy Wu Xiaoling told a seminar on global imbalances, "In my view, every market develops in twists and turns. The Chinese stock market is growing too rapidly. We hope it can grow in a steady manner," Wu said.

At its peak, the combined market value of the two bourses in Shanghai and Shenzhen hit a record $2.5 trillion, exceeding the country's savings deposits for the first time in history. The value of shares in China surged more than six-fold in the past two years, to become the world's fifth-biggest equity market.

Policy makers were not sympathetic to the plight of over zealous red-chip bulls on June 4th. "The speed that stock prices have soared by is extremely unusual, which underscores the structural bubbles in the stock market. China's increase in stamp duty is a proper forward-looking adjustment to avoid greater systemic risks in the market and to ensure its healthy development," the state-owned China Securities Journal wrote. "The huge price fluctuations within each trading day reflect the fact that this trading is unsustainable," the Xinhua News Agency- said.

The Shanghai Stock Index tumbled 7.25% in the morning of June 5th, to as low as 3,402, after PBoC chief Zhou Xiaochuan left open the possibility of further monetary tightening. "There are many reasons for price changes, including money supply, international market movements, domestic supply and demand and so forth. The central bank will use monetary policy to cope with it," he warned.

Yet Shanghai red-chips finished the day with a furious 10% rally off the intra-day low to close 2.6% higher at 3,767-points. Bargain hunters swooped into the marketplace, after Shanghai red-chips had tumbled as much as 21% in four trading days, wiping out $450 billion of market value. Buyers spread rumors that Beijing would not introduce a capital gains tax for 3-years to stabilize the market.

There is an unshakeable belief that Beijing can move the red-chip market to its desires by remote control, thru jawboning and adjustments in the money supply. The rise in China's 5-year bond yield to 3.82% is not as threatening as it appears, when one considers that China's official inflation rate is expected to accelerate to 3.5% to 4% in the months ahead, reflecting sharply higher food prices.

However, there is a much bigger storm looming on the horizon that could overwhelm Beijing, and wreak further havoc on Chinese red-chips, its economy, and the Asian region. This gathering storm was under the spotlight in the May 25th and June 1st editions of Global Money Trends, with further updates for the June 8th edition.

This article is just the tip of the Iceberg, of what's available in the Global Money Trends newsletter, published on Friday mornings, for 44 issues per year!

Here's what you will receive with a subscription,

Insightful analysis and predictions for the (1) top dozen stock markets around the world, Exchange Traded Funds, and US home-builder indexes (2) Commodities such as crude oil, copper, gold, silver, the DJ Commodity Index, and gold mining and oil company indexes (3) Foreign currencies such as, the Australian dollar, British pound, Euro, Japanese yen, and Canadian dollar (4) Libor interest rates, global bond markets and central bank monetary policies, (5) Central banker "Jawboning" and Intervention techniques that move markets.

GMT filters important news and information into (1) bullet-point, easy to understand analysis, (2) featuring "Inter-Market Technical Analysis" that visually displays the dynamic inter-relationships between foreign currencies, commodities, interest rates and the stock markets from a dozen key countries around the world. Also included are (3) charts of key economic statistics of foreign countries that move markets.

A subscription to Global Money Trends is offered at only $150 US dollars per year for "44 weekly issues", including access to all back issues. Click on the following hyperlink, to order now, http://www.sirchartsalot.com/newsletters.php Call toll free from USA to order, Sunday thru Thursday, 2 am to 4 pm EST, at 866-576-7872.


Gary Dorsch
http://www.sirchartsalot.com/

Mr Dorsch worked on the trading floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange for nine years as the chief Financial Futures Analyst for three clearing firms, Oppenheimer Rouse Futures Inc, GH Miller and Company, and a commodity fund at the LNS Financial Group.

As a transactional broker for Charles Schwab's Global Investment Services department, Mr Dorsch handled thousands of customer trades in 45 stock exchanges around the world, including Australia, Canada, Japan, Hong Kong, the Euro zone, London, Toronto, South Africa, Mexico, and New Zealand, and Canadian oil trusts, ADR's and Exchange Traded Funds.

He wrote a weekly newsletter from 2000 thru September 2005 called, "Foreign Currency Trends" for Charles Schwab's Global Investment department, featuring inter-market technical analysis, to understand the dynamic inter-relationships between the foreign exchange, global bond and stock markets, and key industrial commodities.

Disclaimer: SirChartsAlot.com's analysis and insights are based upon data gathered by it from various sources believed to be reliable, complete and accurate. However, no guarantee is made by SirChartsAlot.com as to the reliability, completeness and accuracy of the data so analyzed. SirChartsAlot.com is in the business of gathering information, analyzing it and disseminating the analysis for informational and educational purposes only. SirChartsAlot.com attempts to analyze trends, not make recommendations. All statements and expressions are the opinion of SirChartsAlot.com and are not meant to be investment advice or solicitation or recommendation to establish market positions. Our opinions are subject to change without notice. SirChartsAlot.com strongly advises readers to conduct thorough research relevant to decisions and verify facts from various independent sources.

Copyright © 2005-2007 SirChartsAlot, Inc. All rights reserved.

Labels:

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Another Inconvenient Truth - Puru Saxena

THE BIG PICTURE - Let's face it, our planet is facing an energy crisis. If nothing is done to reduce our dependence on crude oil and if the human race is unable to find a viable alternative source of energy, the 1970's oil-shocks will look like a picnic! Most people remain oblivious to the fact that the supply of oil is struggling to keep up with rising global demand. And when you factor in the reality that over 60% of the world's top oil-producing nations are already past their peak output, the picture starts to cause some alarm. Now, I am not saying that our world is going to run out of oil tomorrow. Far from it! However, the rate at which we pump this stuff out from the ground is likely to enter an irreversible decline.

When painting a rosy outlook for the world's energy situation, the governments always like to talk about the huge amounts of oil reserves supposedly present in the Middle-East. Whether these "reserves" are there at all or if they have been over-stated, is highly debatable. However, what the officials forget is that reserves are not worth much if they cannot deliver oil fast enough. For example, I may claim that I have discovered a trillion barrels of oil under my backyard, but how helpful is this reserve in solving the world's energy problem if it only produces say a hundred thousand barrels of oil per day? In a world where the global demand for oil is running at 84.5 million barrels per day and supply is extremely tight (Figure 1), rather than taking comfort from the Middle-Eastern oil-reserves, we must focus on the amount of oil that we can actually bring to the market.

Figure 1: Can supply continue to expand?


Source: Dr. Ed Yardeni

Moreover, in order to grasp the world's oil supply dynamics, it is crucial to understand that every oil-field or oil-province on the planet is governed by the laws of geology. In other words, once you have extracted more than 50% of the oil present in any given field, the rate of production peaks and thereafter enters a decline. This is what geologists refer to as "Peak Oil". Now, some would argue that this is a conspiracy, but a quick look at some historical data proves that "peak oil" is a reality; an inconvenient truth!

There can be no disputing the fact that the United States' oil production peaked in the early 1970's and today its output is roughly 50% below its record-high. In other words, despite all the amazing technology at its disposal, the world's most "developed" nation, has failed to ramp up its oil-production and now imports roughly 65% of its oil. So, if "Peak Oil" is indeed a myth or a conspiracy and if new forms of technology will surely help us find and produce an unlimited quantity of oil, why then, has the most technologically advanced nation failed in this "easy and simple" task? Simply, it does not exist.

Next, let us turn to Saudi Arabia. It is interesting to note that despite their highly- advertised reserves of 270 billion barrels, Saudi oil production has in fact fallen since 2004 and is still below the record-output achieved in 1981 (Figure 2). It is not as if the Saudis do not have an incentive to produce oil when it is trading above $60 per barrel. So, you have to wonder why the Saudi's have failed to maintain let alone increase their oil production.

Figure 2: Saudi Arabia's production in decline!


Source: Dr. Ed Yardeni

It is no secret that all of the "super-giant" oil-fields in Saudi Arabia were discovered several decades ago and are very mature. Some geologists claim that these oil-fields are now in a permanent state of decline and the national oil company (Saudi Aramco) is taking desperate measures (injecting massive quantities of water) in order to maintain the pressure in their oil-fields. If this assessment proves to be correct, we are in trouble.

Over in Mexico, the news is also ominous. It was recently announced that its largest oil-field (Cantarell) peaked in 2004 at 2.15 million barrels per day and since then 600,000 barrels of oil per day has been lost due to the inevitable "peak". Today, Cantarell (the world's second largest oil field) produces only 1.5 million barrels of oil per day; a sharp fall in a short period of time! Over the coming year or two, Mexico expects to lose another 500,000 barrels per day of oil production as Cantarell's decline accelerates.

In Asia, the picture also looks gloomy. DaQing, China's largest oil-field is also past its peak output, which means that the world's most populated nation will have to import even more oil in the future.

Declining production from existing oil-fields in different parts of the world would not have been worrisome if we were still discovering gigantic oil-fields in new frontiers. However, it is my observation that over the past 35 years, only a single gigantic oil-field has been discovered anywhere in the world (Kashagan Oil-field discovery in 2000). Furthermore, it is worth noting that due to rising costs and technological difficulties, its production will only commence in 2009 and peak output may reach 1.5 million barrels per day - a drop in the ocean.

So, the point I am making is that even if we were to discover a world-class oil-field today, the supply from that will probably not reach the market for another decade and we will need to find many oil-fields to feed the rapidly rising global demand. To complicate matters further, over the coming years, it is expected that more and more existing oil-fields will enter a decline. So, rather than adding to the global supply in any meaningful manner, additional supplies from new fields may only just about compensate for the decline in the older fields. This is a sobering thought often overlooked by many oil-analysts and economists.

In any market, it is pointless to only look at supply without examining demand, so let us review some of the trends in this area. Despite elevated prices, the global demand for oil is at a record-high. So far, "high" prices have not had any impact on curbing demand. Although demand from the industrialised nations has declined somewhat, the emerging-world, led by China and India, has continued to consume ever-larger quantities of oil. Going forwards, it is expected that roughly 500 million Asians will migrate areas to urban centres over the coming decade and this will continue to increase the demand for crude oil.

Today, the average American uses roughly 25 barrels of oil per annum, whereas the average Chinese uses a miniscule 2 barrels per annum and the average Indian burns less than a barrel per year! Some of the more developed Asian nations such as Hong Kong, South Korea and Japan consume roughly 17 barrels of oil on a per-capita basis. It is worth noting that despite extremely low per-capita consumption levels, today China and India combined, consume 11% of the world's crude oil versus 6% at the start of the decade! If current growth rates continue over the next decade, we would require an additional Saudi Arabia to fulfill this demand.

Now, my research has convinced me that there is no other Saudi Arabia waiting in the ranks to meet the rising Chinese and Indian demand. Moreover, if my assessment is correct and the global supply of oil is unable to appreciate by much from the current levels (84.5 million barrels per day), we will see a significantly higher price of crude oil. Ultimately, if nothing is done to solve this problem, we may see shortages and rationing of the world's most important natural resource.

The above is an excerpt from Money Matters, a monthly economic publication, which highlights extraordinary investment opportunities in all major markets. In addition to the monthly reports, subscribers also benefit from timely and concise "Email Updates", which are sent out when an important development in the capital markets warrants immediate attention. Subscribe Today!

Puru Saxena
www.purusaxena.com

Puru Saxena is the editor and publisher of Money Matters, an economic and financial publication NOW available at www.purusaxena.com.

An investment adviser based in Hong Kong, he is a regular guest on CNBC, BBC, Bloomberg, NDTV Profit and writes for several newspapers and financial journals.

Copyright © 2005-2007 Puru Saxena Limited. All rights reserved

Labels:

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Nationalization – A Plan for World Domination - David Jonsson

by David Jonsson

"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary
act." - George Orwell

We are witnessing how nation states are increasing using nationalization as a tool for world control of energy production, energy transportation, basic products and financial assets for control. It appears that the actions of Russia and China combined with pawns the Islamist states and the Leftist governments in Latin America are coordinated in their actions. Initially the nationalizations were occurring within the countries, and recently these actions have extended into the EU and the U.S.

In many cases the immediate result has the increased rewards to the sellers of EU and U.S. companies to the foreign state owned entities. The EU and U.S. investors, the populous and their compliant governments fail to realize the long term implications of the sale to the totalitarian regimes.

The funding of these foreign totalitarian Islamist, Marxist and Communist states has come from the disastrous financial performance – balance of trade, outsourcing and fiscal deficits and energy dependence on Islamist and Marxist states. The actions have been further facilitated by the banks and financial advisors seeking immediate financial gain. These actions have also led to acceptance of Shariah law applied to the financial sector as a step toward gradual Islamization of the countries.

Who are the players and what are the recent actions?

Living in Bubble Land
We live in a virtuous circle world predicated on the belief that credit will continue to sustain economic growth. The total outstanding value of all derivatives has surged to over $400 trillion in 2006; rising a third since 2005, from a total of $297 trillion, says the Bank of International Settlements. When a market grows almost 40 percent in a single year to $415 trillion, regulators are bound to get a little nervous. The guardians of financial stability are all too aware that many of these securities haven’t yet had to prove their ability to withstand a shock.
China’s Equity Bubble

Stephen Roach of Morgan Stanley commenting on the May 22 Jack Crooks Daily Forex Commentary:

“China’s equity bubble is an offshoot of this same problem. Washington’s China bashers appear to be drawing on the same game plan of forced currency revaluation that wreaked havoc on the Japanese economy in the 1990s. As was the case with the endaka (strong yen) of the late 1980s, Yuan appreciation is now taken as a given by domestic and international investors - only questions of degree and timing remain unanswered. There is an eerie similarity between currency-driven outcomes in the two equity markets. In both cases, one-way currency bets turned equities into the asset of choice for the “hot money” of liquidity-fueled investors. Is it a coincidence that China’s A-shares began their recent run only a few months after the pegged-currency regime was abandoned in July 2005? Similarly, was it a coincidence that the Japanese equity bubble emerged in the late 1980s in the aftermath of a Plaza accord that steered the yen/dollar cross rate from 254 in early 1985 to 145 in early 1990? Given the lack of alternative assets in a still undeveloped Chinese financial system, the equity bubble may be even more of a foregone conclusion in China than it was in Japan.”

Where is all this liquidity coming from? East Asian emerging economies are mostly creditor nations. Moreover, much of their accumulation of external assets is in official hands. By February of this year, the foreign currency reserves of east and south Asian countries had reached $3,280bn, up by $2,490bn since the beginning of 1999. If a substantial part of the world economy is generating huge current account surpluses, somebody else has to run offsetting deficits. The result will be toward increased protectionism. It also leads to the goal of the nationalization. Finally, it compels US monetary authorities to sustain easy monetary policy, in order to offset the leakage from domestic demand caused by the huge current account deficits. These trends are not desirable or sustainable.

Last year, for example, the biggest source was China. In the 12 months that ended in January, China accumulated $259 billion in reserves, bringing its total then to just over $1.1 trillion. Cash is flooding into the economy. Foreign-exchange reserves rose by a record $136 billion in the first quarter to $1.2 trillion, the most in the world, the central bank said. The rise in assets is fueled by exports that are so cheap that foreign exchange reserves are growing at a rate of $1 million a minute. The recycling of most of those reserves into U.S. Treasury bonds is a major factor keeping U.S. interest rates low. And that has helped the private-equity groups pursue a wealth of corporate operations that once might have seemed out of bounds.

BusinessWeek reports that there are worries in Asia, the Middle East and elsewhere that the U.S. has become an economic underachiever and the “weakest link in the global economy.” The International Monetary Fund went so far as to warn in its most recent World Economic Outlook that one of the biggest uncertainties is “whether the global economy will be able to decouple from the U.S. were the latter to slow down more sharply.” And this in part explains why such a close American ally as Kuwait feels the need to unhook its currency from the U.S. dollar, as the Persian Gulf emirate announced Sunday. That link has been dragging down Kuwaiti purchasing power as the dollar sank against the euro and other currencies, and the move to sever that dinar-dollar relationship is one other Gulf countries are thought to be looking at as well. Most Persian Gulf oil producers -- long allied with a protective U.S. -- are moving closer to China and its neighbors, a trend exemplified earlier this month by the East-meets-Mideast conference in Riyadh co-hosted by Saudi Arabia and Japan. The actions of Russian, Iranian and Central Asian players in the petroleum business have also raised questions about the dollar.

The Middle East - The Role of Islamic Finance
Not long ago, Islamic Finance was widely regarded as a specialized, if not obscure, backwater of global banking. On May 23, 2007 the Financial Times published an outstanding special FT Report – Islamic Finance. The lead article By Roula Khalaf and Gillian Tett, Financial Times was: Backwater sector moves into global mainstream.

The UK, now home to two Islamic banks, is vying to become a center for Islamic finance. Sukuks, or asset-based Islamic bonds, are being marketed to international investors.
The new demands for the recycling of capital flows caused by the rise in the oil price have fueled an unprecedented economic boom in the Middle East. These events have been met with innovation in the provision of Islamic financial products, offering ingredients, for the first time, for a larger scale industry.

The history of modern finance is littered with numerous examples of financial booms and busts, where financiers have dashed en masse into new immature, fragmented and opaque markets - producing subsequent scandals when it emerges that a host of shaky business practices underpinned this investment mania.

And while no major scandals involving the Islamic finance sector have come to light so far, the boom in the industry has occurred amid a much wider credit bubble in global financial markets.
“Right now we have a credit bubble - you can sell almost anything to anybody, including in the Islamic finance world,” says one investment banker. “People should certainly be asking hard questions about financial practices in the Islamic finance sector.”

Islamic Economics – The Hard Questions
In 2006 I wrote the book Islamic Economics and the Final Jihad: The Muslim Brotherhood to the Leftist/Marxist - Islamist Alliance in which I wrote about the history and expansion of the use of Islamic Economics as a weapon for world domination. The concepts for Islamic Economics were further developed in my article from the Global Politician on December 20, 2006; Islamic Economics and Shariah Law: A Plan for World Domination.

The Plan involves the i