Peter Schiff versus Diane Swonk ( 06/13/06)

Loose Money And the Roots Of the Crisis

Judy Shelton writes for the WSJ

If capitalism depends on designating a person of godlike abilities to manage demand and supply for all forms of money and credit -- currency, demand deposits, money-market funds, repurchase agreements, equities, mortgages, corporate debt -- we are as doomed as those wretched citizens who relied on central planning for their economic salvation.

Think of it: Nothing is more vital to capitalism than capital, the financial seed corn dedicated to next year's crop. Yet we, believers in free markets, allow the price of capital, i.e., the interest rate on loanable funds, to be fixed by a central committee in accordance with government objectives. We might as well resurrect Gosplan, the old Soviet State Planning Committee, and ask them to draw up the next five-year plan.

Bail-Out: What's the alternative?

Comrades,

I was asked by a couple of readers, what the alternative to the bail-out is. The concerns are well placed. If the credit dries up, even good businesses will suffer, it will affect their day to day operations, ability expand, and make good on payments including salaries.

By taking away the bad debts from the books of the banks, one is not only rewarding bad behaviour, but also ignoring the fundamental problem - the cartelization of credit. It is a bad system; it is pyramiding of credit; and it creates a set of winners and losers, not according to their merits and demerits, but according to their ability or inability to pervert the system.

The main cause of the banking crisis is the inability of the borrowers to repay their debts.Too much credit shoved down the throat of undeserving borrowers is what caused the crisis; more of the same isn't going to solve it. The bubble also created a glut in housing and related industries, malinvestmets as Austrian Economists would call it; and that needs to be purged.

Bailing out the banks will not reverse the tightening of the credit standards. 20% downpayment will be the standard, one would hope. More over, the option-ARMs are still adjusting, which means housing prices will continue to sink, leading to further pressure on the banks. Commercial real estate, credit cards and autoloans are under stress, as we speak. So this staggering 700 billion price tag is only just the beginning.

Further more, Fed is injecting staggering amounts of credit into the banking system, with out any Congressional approval I might add. Fed's balance sheet is chock full of bad loans. The bail-out bill was intended to provide the power to the treasury to do targeted operation to permanently take the bad debt off the balance sheet, rather than general injection of new credit into the system.

Last but not least, there will be opportunity costs to the bail-out. By diverting real resources, either through taxation or through inflation, the government will be taking capital resources away from successful companies and directing it towards failed enterprises.

Chart: Monetary base

The regulators have a decision to make, whether they want to prolong the agony of pulling off a band-aid.

Contrary to popular belief, the current group of goons managing the economic policy are not freemarketers. Which is why I have often said time and again that Milton Friedmanites are Keynesians in drag. Keynes is a fabian socialist whom most leftwing economists worship openly, and their right wing counterparts worship secretly. Sure, they all talk-up a good game.

Finally, if bureaucrats and politicians are such supermen/superwomen, who could solve any real crisis in the economy ( a creation of these very people ) by waving a magic wand, shouldn't we just transfer the responsibily of planning the economy ( as to how many pencils and lipsticks to be produced per year ) to these very same superdudes and superdudettes? In other words, comrades, shouldn't we all embrace Marxism?

Why did Keynesians and Monetarists Get It All Wrong?

Bailout marks Karl Marx's comeback ( click to read the whole article )

In his Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, Karl Marx proposed 10 measures to be implemented after the proletariat takes power, with the aim of centralizing all instruments of production in the hands of the state. Proposal Number Five was to bring about the “centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.”

If he were to rise from the dead today, Marx might be delighted to discover that most economists and financial commentators, including many who claim to favour the free market, agree with him.

Indeed, analysts at the Heritage and Cato Institute, and commentators in The Wall Street Journal and on this very page, have made declarations in favour of the massive “injection of liquidities” engineered by central banks in recent months, the government takeover of giant financial institutions, as well as the still stalled US$700-billion bailout package. Some of the same voices were calling for similar
interventions following the burst of the dot-com bubble in 2001.

“Whatever happened to the modern followers of my free-market opponents?” Marx would likely wonder.

Blast From The Past

Peter Schiff on Neil Cavuto:



All these fools, who didn't see the crisis coming, are claiming they can solve the problem with 700B. Not counting all the bad debt that the Fed has already accumulated already, this 700B will be just the start. THere is a commercial real estate collapse still ahead of us, So is it with all the Alt-A, Option-ARM and then prime mortages.

The guy with the long hair apparently is on monetarist/supply-side kool-aid and Mike Norman is a Keynes cultist.

Peter Schiff versus Art Laffer:


Here is another one - Debate with Art Laffer. "Libertarian" Art Laffer's expertise will be sought by the GOVERNMENT to "solve" the current crisis.

Art Laffer said Economy is working beautifully, because of good monetary policy, good economic policy, good trade policy etc. He and his supply-side statists have no right to blame democrats or the government for the current crisis. He quotes GOVERNMENT produced lies, damn lies and statistics to "buttress" his statements.

What caused the credit crisis?

Even though I don't completely agree with every argument/statments expressed in this video, I still believe it has a lot of merit.

Peter Boockvar: Let The Market Fix The Crisis

Peter Boockvar makes a case against the bail out of the plutocrats.

Fed Seize WAMU & Bail Out In Shambles

Bail Out In Shambles:

Plutocrats, by that I mean the punters on Wall Street and the plunderers in D.C. have underestimated the will of the general public. Protests are breaking out all over the country, especially in D.C. and on Wall Street. Congressmen and Senators have their phone lines, fax lines and email inundated with calls, faxes and emails from their constituents.

An email from Manhattan: "I just walked by the New York Stock Exchange. Hundreds of demonstrators have gathered to protest the government's bailout of Wall Street. Several were holding placards that read "Stop the bailout! Read The Road to Serfdom by FA Hayek. Read mises.org " They were also handing out copies of Ron Paul's 2003 speech introducing his bill to eliminate subsidies to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. ( from blog.mises.org/blog )

Republicans have grown cojones ( pardon my French ) and decided to not go along, at least for now. Even if that is just a political stunt, if it really works, there is still hope for the rest of us mere mortals.

WAMU No More:
In the mean time, in an instance of biggest retail banking collapse in history, the Feds have seized the operations of Washington Mutual. A deal has been struck to transfer most of the operations to JP Morgan Chase.

Your Daddy's Financial Crisis?

The best case scenario for a way out of the current mess, at least as this amateur sees it, is a 1970s style high inflation decade. If the bail out goes through, there is a real possibility of a currency collapse. America is addicted, not just to foreign oil, but to foreign credit.

If bank collapses cascade, that in itself is negative for confidence in the dollar. Shrinking government revenues at local, state and federal level is enough incentive to run the printing presses. When push comes to shove, some form of bail out will happen anyway. But 700 billion price tag is a staggering start, not counting all the bad paper that the Federal reserve has already accumulated.

In conclusion, daddy's Financial Crisis is the best possible scenario. Let's hope that it doesn't get any worse.

War on Your Wallet

Comrades,

When government declares war on something or somebody, whether it is war on drugs, war on poverty, war on terror, that means they are about to pick your wallet. Today, the government declared war, almost literally, against the turmoil in the financial markets. The Government, like mafia or a protection racket, is always looking for dragons to slay. It is on the prowl, looking for the next enemy.

The Government will use Tax Payers wallets as a sink for illiquid, financial carcasses. Every attempt will be made to keep a semblance of stability until after the presidential election. For instance, short selling - a strategy used by speculators to make profit from falling price of a financial instrument, will be banned until Friday Jan 16, 2009. Coincidence? You decide.

Recently Steve Jobs blamed short sellers for the falling price of Apple stock ( which is often a red flag - Execs sometimes use short sellers as a cover for their own incompetence. Not suggesting that as a certainty in this case ). A healthy number of short sellers a.k.a bears a.k.a skeptics is what keeps markets in balance. The skeptics usually pick apart the reports, they read the fine print, they read between the lines and they usually are the ones who blow the whistle at corporate corruption.

Policing Short Sales :

Companies are now lining up at SEC to add their ticker to the list that will be "protected" from short selling. Pakistani state apparatus recently tried to police short selling during their own version of market tumult. Immediate reaction of the punters was to drive up the markets, soon followed by a 25% crash. Later on, angry mob vandalized the Karachi stock market.

Don't be Fuld again:

"They called him the Gorilla - the brawler known as the scariest man on Wall Street," writes the Times of London about Richard Fuld, CEO of Lehman, and the story tells of his rise and fall. Here is a striking annotated painting posted outside Lehman offices for staff to post their comments on. Click here to view. (Thanks to mises.org)