Rick Santelli: Rant of the Year

On CNBC

Cast Aways: A Thought Experiment

Here is a thought experiment:

Imagine an Island with population for 4 people: Frank Farmer, Charlie Chef, Mike Miner, Sam Smith.

Frank grows grains for all the other three, Charlie bakes and cooks for all the other three, Mike Mines Iron & coal, and Sam makes tools for all the other three. They sleep in caves and live their lives.

Frank saves some grains for that proverbial rainy day. Mike saves some coal and steel, just in case the mine collapses, or if he falls sick. Charlie pickles some vegetables and meat, just incase. Sam keeps few extra tools, just in case he becomes handicapped.

One fine day, Barry Bum washes up the shore of the Island. The islanders welcome Barry. They had an overdose of confidence. Out of the goodness of their heart, they feed Barry the first day. Barry promises that he will pay them back with interest. Next day, Barry eats another meal and gives them an IOU. All of a sudden, Charlie realizes that there is more demand for his cuisines, he starts to serv up his savings. He realize that he needs more utensils, which comes from Sam's savings. Sam suddenly realizes that he needs to replenish his savings, and demands more from Mike's savings. Charlie demands more grain from Frank and that starts to deplete Frank's savings. This goes on for some time as everybody keeps themselves busy. Barry in the mean time takes a vacation to a near by island for a couple of days and comes back ( Home equity extraction ). Once the savings gets depleted, people work harder and produce a little bit more than they used to, to feed the extra person Barry.

Then proverbial rainy day arrives; Charlie falls sick and decides to cash the IOUs he has recieved from Barry. However, Barry has nothing to pay his debts with and hence no way for Charlie to repay his own debts back to Frank or Sam. This causes Sam to realize that he has no way of paying Mike. A credit crunch takes shape. They also realized that there is no need to do the extra work to keep feeding the unproductive Barry. Suddenly Charlie stop producing for Barry, hence he demands less from Frank and Sam.

Ed Empircal Economist comes to the picture and says, there is a lack of confidence. Charlie needs to start feeding Barry as if nothing has happened. He says aggregate demand is going down. See all the idle tools now? Government needs to take over and put these "idle" resources to use.

The reality is, economy was consuming more than it was producing, thus depleting the savings. It was malinvested in unproductive activities. May be, just may be, all the tools and savings allocated to making baking utensils need to re-allocated to some productive activity. May be they need to make pull-carts to transport the produce and iron ore.

If you introduce money into this island's economy, nothing changes. When the farmer produces 100 island dollars worth of grains and produce, converts it to cash and save 10 island dollars, that savings exist as real goods in the economy. Same goes for Mike Miner, Charlie Chef, Sam Smith. When an entreprenuer borrows money to invest, he is actually creating claims against these savings of real resources and putting them to use.

Printing a bunch of money and throwing into the island is not going to make the savings re-appear overnight. The depleted savings have to be rebuilt.

Real life characters are unlikely to lend to Barry the bum to the point of their ruin. Which is the reason why Garry Government, takes away the risk by guaranteeing all the loans, implicitly or explicitly.

Matt Simmons on the Oil Market

Amity Shlaes: The Forgotten Man - Interview

I recenlty ordered "The Forgotten Man". Amity Shlaes, the author is an adjunct associate professor at NYU's Stern Business School.

Warren Buffet: Nobody Knows If Fiscal Stimulus will work

Susie Gharib: But there is debate about whether there should be fiscal stimulus, whether tax cuts work or not. There is all of this academic debate among economists. What do you think? Is that the right way to go with stimulus and tax cuts?

WB: The answer is nobody knows. The economists don’t know. All you know is you throw everything at it and whether it’s more effective if you’re fighting a fire to be concentrating the water flow on this part or that part. You’re going to use every weapon you have in fighting it. And people, they do not know exactly what the effects are. Economists like to talk about it, but in the end they’ve been very, very wrong and most of them in recent years on this. We don’t know the perfect answers on it. What we do know is to stand by and do nothing is a terrible mistake or to follow Hoover-like policies would be a mistake and we don’t know how effective in the short run we don’t know how effective this will be and how quickly things will right themselves. We do know over time the American machine works wonderfully and it will work wonderfully again.

( Via Calculated Risk: Click the subject line to read the whole thing )

Do You Have Performance Issues?

Stimulis may be right for you.

Ascent of Money - Book Review

I finished reading this book last week. Niall Ferguson as always makes a very engaging read. Book covers a lot of ground in terms of monetary and banking history. Book tries to explain the role money, banking and finance has played in the development civilization. However, in the end, leaves the author with the impression that it has been put together too quickly, to get it to market before the current turmoil in the financial markets get too far ahead.

Book covers everything from the early history of money to the modern finance, from banking and it's italian origins to the rise of the Rothschild dynasty, and from Incas to the Chinese. I would definitely recommend this to anyone who wants read about the history of money & banking..

Personal disagreements aside about how he interpreted the history, and his solutions for the future, book leaves a lot to be desired in terms of organization. The last chapter on the "Descent of Money" was short and unconvincing to say the least. Mr. Ferguson has worked hard to remain unbiased, but his monetarist bias comes through every now and then.